merge-prep
Skill192 starsChanged 37 days agoMITView on GitHub
Pre-merge analysis and preparation. Analyzes source branch vs target branch: commit stats, conflict detection, file impact. Analysis-only v1 — outputs report + suggested commands, does not auto-merge. Use when: user says 'merge prep', 'pre-merge', 'merge analysis', or /merge-prep
- Commits and pushes
3 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- hmj1026/dhpktheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- cypher0n3/dotagentstheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- sd0xdev/sd0x-dev-flowword for word, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- sd0xdev/sd0x-dev-flow★ 192100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- cypher0n3/dotagents★ 3same name
- hmj1026/dhpk★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository102 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- adrSkill
- agentctl-setupSkill
- architectureSkill
- askSkill
- best-practicesSkill
- bug-fixSkill
- bump-versionSkill
- check-coverageSkill
- claude-healthSkill
- code-exploreSkill
- code-investigateSkill
- codex-architectSkill
- codex-brainstormSkill
- codex-cli-reviewSkill
- codex-code-reviewSkill
- codex-explainSkill
- codex-implementSkill
- codex-review-branchSkill
- codex-review-docSkill
- codex-review-fastSkill
- codex-reviewSkill
- codex-securitySkill
- codex-setupSkill
- codex-test-genSkill
- codex-test-reviewSkill
- contract-decodeSkill
- create-prSkill
- create-requestSkill
- de-ai-flavorSkill
- debugSkill
- deep-analyzeSkill
- deep-exploreSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- dep-auditSkill
- deploy-flowSkill
- dev-security-auditSkill
- doc-refactorSkill
- doc-reviewSkill
- epic-mergeSkill
- feasibility-studySkill
- feature-devSkill
- feature-verifySkill
- fp-briefSkill
- generate-runnerSkill
- gh-stackSkill
- git-investigateSkill
- git-profileSkill
- install-hooksSkill
- install-rulesSkill
- install-scriptsSkill
- issue-analyzeSkill
- jiraSkill
- load-pr-reviewSkill
- necessity-auditSkill
- next-stepSkill
- obsidian-cliSkill
- op-sessionSkill
- orchestrateSkill
- plan-reviewSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Distinctive: line 64
Run the analysis script:
- Distinctive: line 182
No auto-merge: Only output commands, never execute git merge
- Distinctive: line 183
No auto-push: Never execute git push
- Distinctive: line 184
No auto-commit: Never execute git commit
- Distinctive: line 185
No rebase: Never suggest or execute rebase operations
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Merge Prep — Pre-merge Analysis and Preparation
Analyze source branch vs target branch, detect conflicts, output analysis report with suggested commands. v1 is analysis-only — does not execute merge/commit/push.
When NOT to Use
| Scenario | Use Instead |
| Commit code (not merge) | /smart-commit |
| Merge to main (production) | Manual PR flow |
| Just view diff | git diff <target>..<branch> |
| Rebase or squash | Manual operation |
Input
/merge-prep <source-branch> [--target <branch>]
<source-branch>: Branch to merge (required)--target: Target branch (default:{TARGET_BRANCH}ormain)
Workflow
sequenceDiagram
participant C as Claude
participant U as User
C->>C: Step 1: Validate prerequisites
C->>C: Step 2: Pre-merge analysis
C->>U: Show analysis report
U->>C: Acknowledge
C->>C: Step 3: Conflict analysis (if any)
C->>U: Show conflict details + resolution suggestions
C->>C: Step 4: Generate merge commands
C->>U: Output commands for manual executionStep 1: Validate Prerequisites
# 1a. Verify source branch exists
git rev-parse --verify <branch>
# 1b. Verify target branch exists
git rev-parse --verify <target>
# 1c. Verify working tree is clean
git status --porcelain| Check | Failure Action |
| Branch doesn't exist | Halt, list available branches |
| Target not found | Halt, suggest creating it |
| Uncommitted changes | Halt, suggest /smart-commit first |
Step 2: Pre-merge Analysis
Run the analysis script:
bash skills/merge-prep/scripts/pre-merge-check.sh <branch> [target]Script outputs JSON containing:
merge_base: Common ancestorsource_commits: New commits on source branchtarget_commits: Commits on target that source doesn't havehas_conflicts: Whether conflicts existconflict_files: List of conflict filesfile_stats: Affected file statistics
Display analysis report:
## Pre-merge Analysis
| Item | Value |
|------|-------|
| Source branch | feat/new-feature |
| Target branch | main |
| Common ancestor | b03ad72a |
| New commits | 12 |
| Affected files | 46 |
| Predicted conflicts | 9 files |
### Recent Commits
| Hash | Message |
|------|---------|
| abc1234 | feat: Add new API endpoint |
| def5678 | test: Add integration tests |Step 3: Conflict Analysis (if conflicts detected)
For each conflict file, analyze commit history to determine conflict pattern:
| Pattern | Detection | Suggested Strategy |
| Iterative (v1→v3) | Both sides changed, source is superset | Take source |
| Parallel modification | Different people changed different logic | Per-hunk selection |
| Hotfix conflict | Target has hotfix merge, source doesn't | Take target |
| Doc add/add | Both sides added same-name file | Take source |
Display resolution suggestions:
### Conflict Files
| # | File | Pattern | Suggestion | Reason |
|---|------|---------|------------|--------|
| 1 | src/xxx.ts | Iterative | Take source | v3 includes all v1 changes |
| 2 | src/yyy.ts | Parallel | Per-hunk | Two sides changed different functions |
| 3 | docs/zzz.md | add/add | Take source | Target version is outdated |Step 4: Generate Merge Commands
Output commands for manual execution:
## Suggested Merge Commands
### Option A: Merge commit (recommended)
```bash
git checkout <target>
git pull --ff-only origin <target>
git merge <source> --no-ff
# Resolve conflicts if any
# git add <resolved-files>
# git commit
git push origin <target>Option B: Squash merge
git checkout <target>
git pull --ff-only origin <target>
git merge --squash <source>
git commit -m "merge: Merge <source> into <target>"
git push origin <target>
### Step 5: Summary
```markdown
## Merge Summary
| Item | Value |
|------|-------|
| Source | feat/new-feature |
| Target | main |
| Commits | 12 |
| Files | 46 |
| Conflicts | 9 (resolution suggestions provided) |
| Tickets | PROJ-520, PROJ-123 |
⚠️ This is an analysis-only report. Execute the commands manually.Multi-branch Mode
Supports /merge-prep branch1 branch2 branch3 --target develop:
- Analyze each branch sequentially
- Output combined summary
- Suggest merge order (fewest conflicts first)
Prohibited (v1)
- No auto-merge: Only output commands, never execute
git merge - No auto-push: Never execute
git push - No auto-commit: Never execute
git commit - No rebase: Never suggest or execute rebase operations
References
| File | Purpose | When to Read |
| pre-merge-check.sh | Pre-merge analysis script | Step 2 |
Verification
- Source branch exists and working tree is clean
- Pre-merge analysis displayed with user acknowledgment
- Conflicts analyzed with resolution suggestions
- Merge commands are output-only (not executed)
- No secrets in output, no force push suggested
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

