git-investigate
Skill192 starsChanged 37 days agoMITView on GitHub
Git history investigation. Use when: tracking code changes, finding where bugs were introduced, root cause analysis. Not for: code exploration (use code-explore), issue analysis (use issue-analyze). Output: history trace + root cause report.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- sd0xdev/sd0x-dev-flowword for word, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- sd0xdev/sd0x-dev-flow★ 192100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository102 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- adrSkill
- agentctl-setupSkill
- architectureSkill
- askSkill
- best-practicesSkill
- bug-fixSkill
- bump-versionSkill
- check-coverageSkill
- claude-healthSkill
- code-exploreSkill
- code-investigateSkill
- codex-architectSkill
- codex-brainstormSkill
- codex-cli-reviewSkill
- codex-code-reviewSkill
- codex-explainSkill
- codex-implementSkill
- codex-review-branchSkill
- codex-review-docSkill
- codex-review-fastSkill
- codex-reviewSkill
- codex-securitySkill
- codex-setupSkill
- codex-test-genSkill
- codex-test-reviewSkill
- contract-decodeSkill
- create-prSkill
- create-requestSkill
- de-ai-flavorSkill
- debugSkill
- deep-analyzeSkill
- deep-exploreSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- dep-auditSkill
- deploy-flowSkill
- dev-security-auditSkill
- doc-refactorSkill
- doc-reviewSkill
- epic-mergeSkill
- feasibility-studySkill
- feature-devSkill
- feature-verifySkill
- fp-briefSkill
- generate-runnerSkill
- gh-stackSkill
- git-profileSkill
- install-hooksSkill
- install-rulesSkill
- install-scriptsSkill
- issue-analyzeSkill
- jiraSkill
- load-pr-reviewSkill
- merge-prepSkill
- necessity-auditSkill
- next-stepSkill
- obsidian-cliSkill
- op-sessionSkill
- orchestrateSkill
- plan-reviewSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Files
Git Investigate Skill
Trigger
- Keywords: code history, git blame, track changes, who wrote this, when was it changed, root cause, code archaeology
When NOT to Use
- Code review (use codex-review)
- Feature development (use feature-dev)
- Just want to read code (use Read directly)
Command
/git-investigate src/service/xxx.ts:123 # Specific line
/git-investigate processToken # Function name
/git-investigate "error message" # KeywordWorkflow
Locate code -> git blame -> find commit -> trace history -> analyze changes -> reportInvestigation Framework
| Question | Method |
| Who wrote it? | git blame |
| When was it changed? | git log --follow |
| Why was it changed? | commit message + PR |
| What was missed? | git diff compare original vs problematic version |
Common Patterns
| Pattern | Symptom | Root Cause |
| Type removed | Enum value deleted | Assumed no longer needed |
| Condition simplified | If conditions reduced | Missed during refactoring |
| Rename | Partially unchanged | Incomplete search-and-replace |
| Boundary ignored | Only handles main flow | Edge cases not considered |
Output
## Git Investigation Report
- **Target**: <file/feature>
- **Timeline**: <commit range>
- **Root cause**: <analysis>
- **Introduced by**: <commit hash + author>Verification
- Report includes: investigation target, author info, timeline, original vs problematic code
- Root cause has clear analysis
- Fix recommendation is specific and actionable
References
references/commands.md- Git command reference + report template
Examples
Input: Who changed this line of code?
Action: git blame -> find commit -> trace PR -> output reportInput: When was this bug introduced?
Action: git log -p -S -> locate introduction point -> analyze cause -> output reportDoes it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

