check-coverage
Skill192 starsChanged 37 days agoMITView on GitHub
Comprehensive assessment of Unit / Integration / E2E three-layer test coverage, identify gaps and provide actionable recommendations.
3 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- busycaesar/Harnesstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- sd0xdev/sd0x-dev-flowword for word, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- ldayton/Dippytheir own version, first seen Mar 9, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- sd0xdev/sd0x-dev-flow★ 192100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- ldayton/Dippy★ 243same name
- busycaesar/Harness★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository102 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- adrSkill
- agentctl-setupSkill
- architectureSkill
- askSkill
- best-practicesSkill
- bug-fixSkill
- bump-versionSkill
- claude-healthSkill
- code-exploreSkill
- code-investigateSkill
- codex-architectSkill
- codex-brainstormSkill
- codex-cli-reviewSkill
- codex-code-reviewSkill
- codex-explainSkill
- codex-implementSkill
- codex-review-branchSkill
- codex-review-docSkill
- codex-review-fastSkill
- codex-reviewSkill
- codex-securitySkill
- codex-setupSkill
- codex-test-genSkill
- codex-test-reviewSkill
- contract-decodeSkill
- create-prSkill
- create-requestSkill
- de-ai-flavorSkill
- debugSkill
- deep-analyzeSkill
- deep-exploreSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- dep-auditSkill
- deploy-flowSkill
- dev-security-auditSkill
- doc-refactorSkill
- doc-reviewSkill
- epic-mergeSkill
- feasibility-studySkill
- feature-devSkill
- feature-verifySkill
- fp-briefSkill
- generate-runnerSkill
- gh-stackSkill
- git-investigateSkill
- git-profileSkill
- install-hooksSkill
- install-rulesSkill
- install-scriptsSkill
- issue-analyzeSkill
- jiraSkill
- load-pr-reviewSkill
- merge-prepSkill
- necessity-auditSkill
- next-stepSkill
- obsidian-cliSkill
- op-sessionSkill
- orchestrateSkill
- plan-reviewSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 15
Test sufficiency review via Codex (use /codex-test-review)
- Distinctive: line 38
Read specified feature docs.
- Distinctive: line 45
Search related source code based on feature documentation.
- Distinctive: line 49
Check whether each source file has corresponding tests (unit, integration, e2e).
- Distinctive: line 54
Read source: Identify public methods, important branches, error handling
- Distinctive: line 55
Read tests: Identify covered cases
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Test Coverage Analysis
Trigger
- Keywords: check coverage, test coverage, coverage analysis, coverage gaps, check-coverage
When NOT to Use
- Test sufficiency review via Codex (use
/codex-test-review) - Generating tests (use
/codex-test-gen) - Running tests (use
/verify)
Parent Skill Reference
See @skills/test-review/SKILL.md for Codex-based test review workflow.
Agent Dispatch
Agent({
description: "Assess three-layer test coverage and identify gaps",
subagent_type: "coverage-analyst",
prompt: `Assess Unit / Integration / E2E test coverage for the feature docs at: $ARGUMENTS
Follow the steps defined in this skill.`
})Task
Step 1: Read Feature Documentation
Read specified feature docs. Extract:
- Feature name and objectives
- Involved Service / Provider / Entity
- Core flows and boundary conditions
Step 2: Identify Related Source Code
Search related source code based on feature documentation. Build source code inventory.
Step 3: Map Test Files
Check whether each source file has corresponding tests (unit, integration, e2e).
Step 4: Analyze Coverage Gaps
For each source file:
- Read source: Identify public methods, important branches, error handling
- Read tests: Identify covered cases
- Compare gaps: missing methods, uncovered branches, untested error scenarios
Step 5: Classify and Recommend
| Severity | Description |
| 🔴 Critical | Core logic, data writes, amount calculations |
| 🟠 Major | Important branches, error handling |
| 🟡 Minor | Edge cases, utility functions |
| ⚪ Nice-to-have | Logging, formatting |
Output
# Test Coverage Analysis Report
## Feature Overview
- Feature name: <from documentation>
- Documentation path: $ARGUMENTS
- Related modules: <list>
## Current Coverage
| Module | Source Path | Test Path | Coverage Status |
|--------|------------|-----------|----------------|
## Coverage Gaps
### 🔴 Critical
### 🟠 Major
### 🟡 Minor
## Recommended New Tests
| Priority | Test Type | Test Case | Target File |
|----------|-----------|-----------|-------------|
## Coverage Summary
| Metric | Status |
|--------|--------|
| Feature coverage | X/Y (Z%) |
| Happy path | ✅/❌ |
| Error path | ✅/❌ |
| Edge cases | ✅/❌ |Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

