update-raid
Skill0 starsChanged 16 days agoMITView on GitHub
Update the RAID log — risks, assumptions, issues, dependencies — from evidence. Use when the user asks to update RAID, add a risk, refresh assumptions, or /update-raid. Do not invent severity or green status.
In this repository66 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- a11y-passSkill
- assess-changeSkill
- build-regression-packSkill
- charter-exploratorySkill
- classify-dataSkill
- commitSkill
- cut-releaseSkill
- data-changeSkill
- debugSkill
- design-experimentSkill
- diff-environmentsSkill
- draft-steercoSkill
- engineering-barSkill
- explain-codeSkill
- explore-codebaseSkill
- fix-ciSkill
- handoffSkill
- implement-changeSkill
- incident-triageSkill
- lean-reviewSkill
- map-dependenciesSkill
- map-design-handoffSkill
- map-processSkill
- open-prSkill
- performanceSkill
- plan-data-migrationSkill
- plan-incrementSkill
- plan-rollbackSkill
- plan-uatSkill
- prioritize-backlogSkill
- production-passSkill
- ready-to-mergeSkill
- record-decisionSkill
- refactor-safelySkill
- revert-changeSkill
- review-architectureSkill
- review-changeSkill
- review-pipelineSkill
- security-passSkill
- shape-workSkill
- ship-notesSkill
- spec-analyticsSkill
- spec-observabilitySkill
- start-projectSkill
- synthesize-discoverySkill
- triage-blockersSkill
- triage-defectSkill
- verify-uiSkill
- write-api-examplesSkill
- write-architectureSkill
- write-designSkill
- write-dev-tasksSkill
- write-docsSkill
- write-integration-contractSkill
- write-nfrSkill
- write-opportunitySkill
- write-prdSkill
- write-requirementsSkill
- write-runbookSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 16
Keep one RAID file honest.
- Distinctive: line 18
Do not invent risks, owners, or dates.
- Distinctive: line 35
If the user says “add a risk that we might be late” with no evidence, record it as an assumption or stop and ask what would tell us it is …
- Very specific: line 45
Read AGENTS.md if present.
- Very specific: line 46
Read docs/govern/raid.md if it exists.
- Distinctive: line 48
Add or update only items with a source.
- Distinctive: line 49
Do not change owner, severity, or status to closed unless the user said so.
- Very specific: line 51
After edits, write-status may run — do not write status inside this file beyond the item list.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Update RAID
Keep one RAID file honest. This is not a steerco deck (draft-steerco), not a weekly status (write-status), and not a change request (assess-change).
Do not invent risks, owners, or dates. Do not delete an open item without a human.
Is this the right skill?
| Signal | Do this instead |
| One-page RAG for this week | write-status (read this RAID) |
| Scope/date/design change impact | assess-change |
| Steerco paper | draft-steerco |
| Cross-team contract map | map-dependencies |
Required inputs
- Existing
docs/govern/raid.mdif it exists (create from the template if not) - Evidence: named artifact, ticket id, git fact, or CI result
context/decision-rights.mdif it exists (for escalation)
If the user says “add a risk that we might be late” with no evidence, record it as an assumption or stop and ask what would tell us it is true.
Human decisions (do not invent)
- Severity and owner
- Closing an item
- Date commitments
Procedure
- Read
AGENTS.mdif present. Readcontext/decision-rights.mdif present. - Read
docs/govern/raid.mdif it exists. If not, offer to createdocs/govern/and start from references/raid-template.md. - Open the template only to keep every heading. Do not drop columns.
- Add or update only items with a source. Source = path, ticket id, or “user:
<name>”. - Do not change owner, severity, or status to closed unless the user said so.
- Dependencies name the other team or system from
context/systems-of-record.mdwhen possible. - After edits,
write-statusmay run — do not write status inside this file beyond the item list.
Output
- Path:
docs/govern/raid.md(one file, updated in place) - Template:
references/raid-template.md
Quality bar
- Every new or changed row has a source
- No closed item without a human
- No invented date or owner (
unassignedis allowed) - Headings from the template remain
- Secrets are absent
Done
- Path
- Counts: open risks / assumptions / issues / dependencies
- Next skill:
write-statusorassess-changeif an item is a scope change
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

