design-experiment
Skill0 starsChanged 17 days agoMITView on GitHub
Design an experiment with a hypothesis, an existing product metric, and a stop rule. Use when the user asks for an A/B test, experiment design, hypothesis, or /design-experiment. Do not invent metrics or baselines. Do not write product code.
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Pthahnix/De-Anthropocentric-Research-Enginetheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
- yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-enginetheir own version, first seen Sep 25, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine★ 505same name
- Pthahnix/De-Anthropocentric-Research-Engine★ 504same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository66 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- a11y-passSkill
- assess-changeSkill
- build-regression-packSkill
- charter-exploratorySkill
- classify-dataSkill
- commitSkill
- cut-releaseSkill
- data-changeSkill
- debugSkill
- diff-environmentsSkill
- draft-steercoSkill
- engineering-barSkill
- explain-codeSkill
- explore-codebaseSkill
- fix-ciSkill
- handoffSkill
- implement-changeSkill
- incident-triageSkill
- lean-reviewSkill
- map-dependenciesSkill
- map-design-handoffSkill
- map-processSkill
- open-prSkill
- performanceSkill
- plan-data-migrationSkill
- plan-incrementSkill
- plan-rollbackSkill
- plan-uatSkill
- prioritize-backlogSkill
- production-passSkill
- ready-to-mergeSkill
- record-decisionSkill
- refactor-safelySkill
- revert-changeSkill
- review-architectureSkill
- review-changeSkill
- review-pipelineSkill
- security-passSkill
- shape-workSkill
- ship-notesSkill
- spec-analyticsSkill
- spec-observabilitySkill
- start-projectSkill
- synthesize-discoverySkill
- triage-blockersSkill
- triage-defectSkill
- update-raidSkill
- verify-uiSkill
- write-api-examplesSkill
- write-architectureSkill
- write-designSkill
- write-dev-tasksSkill
- write-docsSkill
- write-integration-contractSkill
- write-nfrSkill
- write-opportunitySkill
- write-prdSkill
- write-requirementsSkill
- write-runbookSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 17
Write a falsifiable bet using a metric this product already has.
- Distinctive: line 19
Do not invent dashboards, baselines, or sample sizes.
- Very specific: line 34
If no existing metric exists, stop.
- Distinctive: line 38
Stop rule (ship / iterate / drop)
- Distinctive: line 44
Read AGENTS.md if present.
- Distinctive: line 50
No secrets. No live personal data in the doc.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Design experiment
Write a falsifiable bet using a metric this product already has. This is not a PRD, not spec-analytics, and not implementation.
Do not invent dashboards, baselines, or sample sizes.
Is this the right skill?
| Signal | Do this instead |
| What events to emit | spec-analytics |
| What to build if the bet is already decided | write-prd / shape-work |
| Quality targets | write-nfr |
Required inputs
- A hypothesis the user can state (or an opportunity/PRD to extract one from)
- A metric already in the product, PRD analytics section, or an existing dashboard the user names
If no existing metric exists, stop. Name spec-analytics only for adding events; do not invent a success number.
Human decisions (do not invent)
- Stop rule (ship / iterate / drop)
- Who may be in the experiment
- Any duration not already constrained
Procedure
- Read
AGENTS.mdif present. Read the PRD or opportunity if named. - Confirm the metric exists in a file or a named dashboard. Otherwise
unknownand stop for the human. - Find the home:
docs/discover/experiment-YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md. - Open references/experiment-template.md. Copy every heading. Write
n/awhen unused. - Hypothesis: if we X, then metric Y (already exists) moves in direction Z, because …
- Guardrails: what must not get worse (existing metrics only, or
unknown). - No secrets. No live personal data in the doc.
Output
- Path:
docs/discover/experiment-YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md - Template:
references/experiment-template.md
Quality bar
- Metric names a source (path, dashboard this program already uses, or user-named)
- No invented baseline
- Stop rule is present or
unknown — need human - Unused headings are
n/a
Done
- Path
- Metric + stop rule or
unknown - Next skill:
spec-analyticsif events are missing;shape-workif they will implement a flag
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

