cut-release
Skill0 starsChanged 17 days agoMITView on GitHub
Cut a version and run this repository's existing release or deploy path. Use when the user asks to release, deploy, tag, publish, or ship to production. Do not invent a pipeline. Do not publish unless asked. Do not spend money or change cloud accounts.
36 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- GLinnik21/plx-nativetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- mediajunkie/piper-morgan-producttheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- delexw/motion-graphics-agenttheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- V-Songbird/foundrytheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- tansu-io/tansutheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- rpraharaj/ai-engineeredited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use quota-axi, iterate-pr and 3 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
layer5ioSkillquota-axi
Report local Claude, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, and Grok quota windows via the quota-axi CLI - remaining percentages, reset times, and provider status read from local auth sources, with no routing, recommendation, or provider mutation. Use before deciding whether it is safe to keep spending a provider's quota, when the user asks about usage, rate limits, or remaining quota, or when comparing local provider headroom.
Also in 4 projects that use this
SentrySkilliterate-pr
Iterate on a PR until actionable CI passes and high/medium review feedback is addressed. Use for PR CI failures, review feedback, or green-check loops; do not wait for human approval, draft status, or merge gates.
Also in 4 projects that use this
layer5ioSkillgh-axi
Operate GitHub through the gh-axi CLI - issues, pull requests, workflow runs, workflows, releases, repositories, labels, Projects (v2), Actions secrets and variables, search, and raw API access. Use whenever a task touches GitHub: listing or filing issues, reviewing or merging PRs, checking CI runs, triggering workflows, cutting releases, managing Projects boards, or managing Actions secrets/variables.
Also in 4 projects that use this
kunchenguidSkillchrome-devtools-axi
Control a Chrome browser session through the chrome-devtools-axi CLI - navigate, snapshot, click, fill forms, run JavaScript, inspect console and network, take screenshots, audit performance. Use whenever a task needs a real browser: opening or testing a web page, clicking through a flow, extracting page content, or debugging a website.
Also in 4 projects that use this
kunchenguidSkilllavish
Turn complex or visual agent responses into rich, reviewable HTML artifacts (HTML files) the user can annotate and send feedback on, using the lavish-axi CLI. Use when about to give a plan, comparison, diagram, table, code diff, report, or anything easier to grasp visually than as prose.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Other versions36 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- rpraharaj/ai-engineer★ 114% same
Wrote their own version · 35
- ToolJet/ToolJet★ 41ksame name
- meshery/meshery★ 12ksame name
- danielmeppiel/apm★ 4.2ksame name
- microsoft/apm★ 4.2ksame name
- Screenly/Anthias★ 3.7ksame name
- Netflix/bpftop★ 2.7ksame name
- tansu-io/tansu★ 1.9ksame name
- fim-ai/fim-agent★ 1.6ksame name
- fim-ai/fim-one★ 1.6ksame name
- libredb/libredb-studio★ 1.3ksame name
25 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository66 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- a11y-passSkill
- assess-changeSkill
- build-regression-packSkill
- charter-exploratorySkill
- classify-dataSkill
- commitSkill
- data-changeSkill
- debugSkill
- design-experimentSkill
- diff-environmentsSkill
- draft-steercoSkill
- engineering-barSkill
- explain-codeSkill
- explore-codebaseSkill
- fix-ciSkill
- handoffSkill
- implement-changeSkill
- incident-triageSkill
- lean-reviewSkill
- map-dependenciesSkill
- map-design-handoffSkill
- map-processSkill
- open-prSkill
- performanceSkill
- plan-data-migrationSkill
- plan-incrementSkill
- plan-rollbackSkill
- plan-uatSkill
- prioritize-backlogSkill
- production-passSkill
- ready-to-mergeSkill
- record-decisionSkill
- refactor-safelySkill
- revert-changeSkill
- review-architectureSkill
- review-changeSkill
- review-pipelineSkill
- security-passSkill
- shape-workSkill
- ship-notesSkill
- spec-analyticsSkill
- spec-observabilitySkill
- start-projectSkill
- synthesize-discoverySkill
- triage-blockersSkill
- triage-defectSkill
- update-raidSkill
- verify-uiSkill
- write-api-examplesSkill
- write-architectureSkill
- write-designSkill
- write-dev-tasksSkill
- write-docsSkill
- write-integration-contractSkill
- write-nfrSkill
- write-opportunitySkill
- write-prdSkill
- write-requirementsSkill
- write-runbookSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 36 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 36
If you cannot find a path, stop.
- Distinctive: line 49
Do not change billing, plans, or accounts.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 36 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Cut release
Publish this version using machinery this repo already has. ship-notes writes the notes; this skill runs the release.
Is this the right skill?
| Signal | Do this instead |
| Notes only | ship-notes |
| Rollback of what just shipped | plan-rollback / revert-change |
| No release path in the repo | print human commands and stop |
Required inputs
- User asked to publish / deploy / tag
gitandAGENTS.md- Detected path: documented Release/Deploy command, existing Makefile/manifest/CI releaser, or host CLI this repo already uses
- Exact release revision and target environment
context/definition-of-done.md,context/decision-rights.md, andcontext/environments.md; stop if the applicable policy or deploy authority is unknown- A Ready record, executed regression results, notes, rollback plan, and human go/no-go evidence for the exact release revision and environment (or explicit authorized waivers for applicable checks)
If you cannot find a path, stop. Do not guess npm publish.
Human decisions (do not invent)
- Publish, tag, push, spend money (stop if a command would bill)
Procedure
- Detect the existing path from README, Makefile, manifest, CI, tags.
- Apply the same gates for standalone invocation and
release-train: secret-scan clean; Ready evidence current; required regression items actually passed; coverage gaps resolved or explicitly waived; notes cover the range; rollback is documented and authorized humans signed go/no-go. Read approval and waiver evidence from the home named incontext/decision-rights.md. Missing, failed, stale, unknown, or not-run prerequisites → stop. A request to publish is not evidence of every required signer's approval. A docs-only or tag-only release may mark a prerequisiten/aonly with a policy-backed reason. ship-notesif the changelog is stale and this repo keeps one.- Version bump only if they asked or the existing script does it.
- Inspect what the detected command does before running it, including automatic production promotion or remote publication. Run only the authorized path in the permitted environment. If decision rights reserve production deployment for a human, print the reviewed command and hand off; do not execute a command that reaches production. Tag only if they asked or the approved script tags. Do not
--forcea tag. If the release command changes version files, verify the resulting revision and refresh affected checks and approvals before publication; do not approve a different revision silently. If preparation and publication cannot be separated enough to verify the required revision, stop and hand off to the authorized human rather than bypassing the gate. - Do not change billing, plans, or accounts.
Output
- Path: reply
- Template: references/release-report.md
Quality bar
- Command is from this repo
- Published only if asked
- No invented pipeline
- No account/billing change
- Required gates passed or have authorized waivers for the exact release revision and environment
- Production execution follows decision rights even when this skill is invoked alone
Done
Fill the report. Next: handoff or stop.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

