explain-code
Skill0 starsChanged 15 days agoMITView on GitHub
Teach a feature or path from the code that exists — entry points, data flow, and what to change. Use when the user asks how X works, explain this, walk me through, or is onboarding onto a feature. Do not implement. Do not invent architecture the tree does not have.
48 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- bradydwardai/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- renzrollon/interlocktheir own version, first seen Nov 5, 2026
- jorgenschaefer/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- sergerad/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- datnt97/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- rpraharaj/ai-engineeredited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use copy-editing, pricing-strategy and 6 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
silvainfmSkillcopy-editing
When the user wants to edit, review, or improve existing marketing copy. Also use when the user mentions 'edit this copy,' 'review my copy,' 'copy feedback,' 'proofread,' 'polish this,' 'make this better,' or 'copy sweep.' This skill provides a systematic approach to editing marketing copy through multiple focused passes.
Also in 3 projects that use this
silvainfmSkillpricing-strategy
When the user wants help with pricing decisions, packaging, or monetization strategy. Also use when the user mentions 'pricing,' 'pricing tiers,' 'freemium,' 'free trial,' 'packaging,' 'price increase,' 'value metric,' 'Van Westendorp,' 'willingness to pay,' or 'monetization.' This skill covers pricing research, tier structure, and packaging strategy.
Also in 3 projects that use this
SentrySkillmarketing-psychology
When the user wants to apply psychological principles, mental models, or behavioral science to marketing. Also use when the user mentions 'psychology,' 'mental models,' 'cognitive bias,' 'persuasion,' 'behavioral science,' 'why people buy,' 'decision-making,' or 'consumer behavior.' This skill provides 70+ mental models organized for marketing application.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GitHubSkillrefactor
Surgical code refactoring to improve maintainability without changing behavior. Covers extracting functions, renaming variables, breaking down god functions, improving type safety, eliminating code smells, and applying design patterns. Less drastic than repo-rebuilder; use for gradual improvements.
Also in 4 projects that use this
OpenAISkillwriting-plans
Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code
Also in 4 projects that use this
GoogleSkillgrill-me
A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.
Also in 7 projects that use this
Other versions48 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- rpraharaj/ai-engineer★ 126% same
Wrote their own version · 47
- AgnosticUI/agnosticui★ 833same name
- renzrollon/interlock★ 61same name
- Integralist/agent-skills★ 23same name
- zbruhnke/claude-code-starter★ 16same name
- rommelporras/kiro-config★ 13same name
- sidkh/skills★ 8same name
- bsene/skills★ 7same name
- holt-os/holt★ 7same name
- viknesh20-20/claude-code-tool-kit★ 7same name
- electronx/wiredkits-free★ 5same name
37 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository66 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- a11y-passSkill
- assess-changeSkill
- build-regression-packSkill
- charter-exploratorySkill
- classify-dataSkill
- commitSkill
- cut-releaseSkill
- data-changeSkill
- debugSkill
- design-experimentSkill
- diff-environmentsSkill
- draft-steercoSkill
- engineering-barSkill
- explore-codebaseSkill
- fix-ciSkill
- handoffSkill
- implement-changeSkill
- incident-triageSkill
- lean-reviewSkill
- map-dependenciesSkill
- map-design-handoffSkill
- map-processSkill
- open-prSkill
- performanceSkill
- plan-data-migrationSkill
- plan-incrementSkill
- plan-rollbackSkill
- plan-uatSkill
- prioritize-backlogSkill
- production-passSkill
- ready-to-mergeSkill
- record-decisionSkill
- refactor-safelySkill
- revert-changeSkill
- review-architectureSkill
- review-changeSkill
- review-pipelineSkill
- security-passSkill
- shape-workSkill
- ship-notesSkill
- spec-analyticsSkill
- spec-observabilitySkill
- start-projectSkill
- synthesize-discoverySkill
- triage-blockersSkill
- triage-defectSkill
- update-raidSkill
- verify-uiSkill
- write-api-examplesSkill
- write-architectureSkill
- write-designSkill
- write-dev-tasksSkill
- write-docsSkill
- write-integration-contractSkill
- write-nfrSkill
- write-opportunitySkill
- write-prdSkill
- write-requirementsSkill
- write-runbookSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 41 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 38
Read AGENTS.md. Skim the entry, the next 1–2 layers, data it reads/writes, and nearest tests.
- Distinctive: line 39
Stop when you can say where it starts, what it does, and where an edit would go.
- Distinctive: line 40
Write the tour from references/explain-template.md.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 41 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Explain code
Teach one path so the next edit is aimed. Do not implement. Do not map the whole repo (explore-codebase).
Is this the right skill?
| Signal | Do this instead |
| Whole repo map / commands | explore-codebase |
| They want a change | shape-work after the tour |
| Invent a target system | stop — read the tree |
Required inputs
- A named symbol, file, route, or feature. If missing, pick the hottest match and say so, or ask one question and stop.
context/glossary.mdif present (follow the pointer inAGENTS.md)
Human decisions (do not invent)
- None. Do not invent types or services.
Procedure
- Read
AGENTS.md. Skim the entry, the next 1–2 layers, data it reads/writes, and nearest tests. - Stop when you can say where it starts, what it does, and where an edit would go.
- Write the tour from references/explain-template.md. Use names from this repo.
Output
- Path: reply, or
docs/explain/<slug>.mdif they asked for a file - Template:
references/explain-template.md
Quality bar
- Starts at a real path or symbol
- Call chain uses this repo’s names
- No invented architecture
- Tests named or
none found
Done
The tour. Next: shape-work or implement-change if they want a change.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

