ariadne-prd
Skill3 starsChanged 32 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when turning product requirements, plans, or an existing backlog into an Ariadne schema version 1 PRD.
In this repository22 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/general/code-reviewer/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- fastify-best-practicesSkill
- agent-toolkit-maintainerSkill
- onboard-repoSkill
- docker-patternsSkill
- accessibilitySkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- thermo-nuclear-code-quality-reviewSkill
- brag-slimSkill
- biome-formattingSkill
- instagram-public-researchSkill
- research-data-collectionSkill
- api-security-auditSkill
- cicd-security-auditSkill
- cloud-misconfiguration-auditSkill
- js-secrets-auditSkill
- llm-agent-security-auditSkill
- security-auditSkill
- source-leak-auditSkill
- ariadneSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Create the smallest executable backlog that preserves the user's intent.
- Very specific: line 15
Read applicable repository instructions and inspect existing code, tests, .ariadne/prd.json, and .ariadne/config.json when present.
- Very specific: line 23
Write valid JSON directly to .ariadne/prd.json at the repository root.
- Very specific: line 26
Use agent-toolkit ariadne init --check <command> to establish them.
- Distinctive: line 54
Every story needs non-empty, observable acceptance criteria.
- Distinctive: line 68
No implementation, status transition, commit, or push is performed while authoring the PRD.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Ariadne PRD
Create the smallest executable backlog that preserves the user's intent. Ask questions only for requirements that remain unresolved after inspecting the request and repository; do not re-ask answered questions or invent product-critical behavior.
Workflow
- Read applicable repository instructions and inspect existing code, tests,
.ariadne/prd.json, and.ariadne/config.jsonwhen present. - Resolve only material unknowns with focused questions. Do not write an affected story until its material requirement is resolved. If a reversible, low-risk assumption is enough, state it and continue.
- Split work into independently testable stories that one runtime agent can implement and verify in one Ariadne iteration. Separate unrelated outcomes, migrations, and cross-subsystem changes.
- Write valid JSON directly to
.ariadne/prd.jsonat the repository root. Preserve completed stories and stable IDs when revising an existing PRD. - Confirm that
.ariadne/config.jsonnames the real repository quality checks. Useagent-toolkit ariadne init --check <command>to establish them; never add unsupported fields to the PRD schema.
Required schema
{
"schemaVersion": 1,
"project": "project-name",
"branchName": "current-branch",
"description": "Measurable project outcome",
"userStories": [
{
"id": "US-001",
"title": "Small independently verifiable outcome",
"description": "What changes and why",
"acceptanceCriteria": [
"Observable pass/fail behavior",
"Relevant automated test or quality evidence passes"
],
"priority": 1,
"status": "pending",
"attempts": 0
}
]
}Every story needs non-empty, observable acceptance criteria. Include relevant
testing, lint, typecheck, build, security, compatibility, or migration evidence
without naming commands that the repository does not provide. Priorities are
positive integers; lower values run first. New stories start pending with
zero attempts.
Quality gate
.ariadne/prd.jsonuses only the schema fields above and schema version1.- IDs are unique, branch and project are correct, and stories fit one iteration.
.ariadne/config.json.qualityCheckscontains at least one real command before a normal run.- Story acceptance evidence identifies which configured checks prove the relevant behavior; repository-wide checks remain in config, not PRD fields.
- No implementation, status transition, commit, or push is performed while authoring the PRD.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

