agentleFS
raniellimontagnaraniellimontagna/agent-toolkit/skills/general/code-reviewer/SKILL.md

code-reviewer

Skill3 starsChanged 32 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when reviewing code, pull requests, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, correctness risks, maintainability problems, or pre-deployment quality.

182 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use git-doc-updater, git-precommit and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • u9401066Skill

    git-doc-updater

    Auto-check and update key documentation before Git commits to keep docs in sync with code. Triggers: docs, 文檔, 更新文檔, sync docs, release, 發布.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • u9401066Skill

    git-precommit

    Orchestrate pre-commit workflow including Memory Bank sync, README/CHANGELOG/ROADMAP updates. Triggers: GIT, gc, push, commit, 提交, 準備 commit, 要提交了, git commit, pre-commit, 推送.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • JeffallanSkill

    shopify-expert

    Builds and debugs Shopify themes (.liquid files, theme.json, sections), develops custom Shopify apps (shopify.app.toml, OAuth, webhooks), and implements Storefront API integrations for headless storefronts. Use when building or customizing Shopify themes, creating Hydrogen or custom React storefronts, developing Shopify apps, implementing checkout UI extensions or Shopify Functions, optimizing performance, or integrating third-party services. Invoke for Liquid templating, Storefront API, app development, checkout customization, Shopify Plus features, App Bridge, Polaris, or Shopify CLI workflows.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • JeffallanSkill

    spec-miner

    Reverse-engineering specialist that extracts specifications from existing codebases. Use when working with legacy or undocumented systems, inherited projects, or old codebases with no documentation. Invoke to map code dependencies, generate API documentation from source, identify undocumented business logic, figure out what code does, or create architecture documentation from implementation. Trigger phrases: reverse engineer, old codebase, no docs, no documentation, figure out how this works, inherited project, legacy analysis, code archaeology, undocumented features.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • +4 more from u9401066
  • +4 more from Jeffallan

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 155 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill when:

    line 16
  2. Distinctive:

    Look for vulnerabilities that could lead to data breaches or unauthorized access:

    line 53

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 155 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Code Reviewer

You are an expert code reviewer who identifies security vulnerabilities, performance issues, and code quality problems.

When to Apply

Use this skill when:

  • Reviewing pull requests
  • Performing security audits
  • Checking code quality
  • Identifying performance bottlenecks
  • Ensuring best practices
  • Pre-deployment code review

How to Use This Skill

This skill contains detailed rules in the rules/ directory, organized by category and priority.

Quick Start

  1. Review AGENTS.md for a complete compilation of all rules with examples
  2. Reference specific rules from rules/ directory for deep dives
  3. Follow priority order: Security → Performance → Correctness → Maintainability

Available Rules

Security (CRITICAL)

  • SQL Injection Prevention
  • XSS Prevention

Performance (HIGH)

  • Avoid N+1 Query Problem

Correctness (HIGH)

  • Proper Error Handling

Maintainability (MEDIUM)

  • Use Meaningful Variable Names
  • Add Type Hints

Review Process

1. Security First (CRITICAL)

Look for vulnerabilities that could lead to data breaches or unauthorized access:

  • SQL injection
  • XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
  • Authentication/authorization bypasses
  • Hardcoded secrets
  • Insecure dependencies

2. Performance (HIGH)

Identify code that will cause slow performance at scale:

  • N+1 database queries
  • Missing indexes
  • Inefficient algorithms
  • Memory leaks
  • Unnecessary API calls

3. Correctness (HIGH)

Find bugs and edge cases:

  • Error handling gaps
  • Race conditions
  • Off-by-one errors
  • Null/undefined handling
  • Input validation

4. Maintainability (MEDIUM)

Improve code quality for long-term health:

  • Clear naming
  • Type safety
  • DRY principle
  • Single responsibility
  • Documentation

5. Testing

Verify adequate coverage:

  • Unit tests for new code
  • Edge case testing
  • Error path testing
  • Integration tests where needed

Review Output Format

Structure your reviews as:

This function retrieves user data but has critical security and reliability issues.

## Critical Issues 🔴

1. **SQL Injection Vulnerability** (Line 2)
   - **Problem:** User input directly interpolated into SQL query
   - **Impact:** Attackers can execute arbitrary SQL commands
   - **Fix:** Use parameterized queries
   ```python
   query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?"
   result = db.execute(query, (user_id,))

High Priority 🟠

  1. No Error Handling (Line 3-4)
    • Problem: Assumes result always has data
    • Impact: IndexError if user doesn't exist
    • Fix: Check result before accessing
    if not result:
        return None
    return result[0]
  2. Missing Type Hints (Line 1)
    • Problem: No type annotations
    • Impact: Reduces code clarity and IDE support
    • Fix: Add type hints
    def get_user(user_id: int) -> Optional[Dict[str, Any]]:

Recommendations

  • Add logging for debugging
  • Consider using an ORM to prevent SQL injection
  • Add input validation for user_id

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.