agentleFS
rade-nugrohorade-nugroho/Agentic-Enteprises-Skill/cross-department-translation/SKILL.md

cross-department-translation

Skill9 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

Reframes messages, requirements, metrics, and decisions for organizational audiences—engineering, product, finance, legal, compliance, sales, operations, actuarial, and executive—by detecting jargon, surfacing implicit assumptions, producing dual-audience briefs, RACI-aligned handoffs, owner-tagged meeting actions, technical-to-business and business-to-technical translation, and escalation summaries. Use when translating for engineering, explaining to finance, cross-department bridging, rewriting for executives, business-friendly versions, technical summaries for leadership, inter-team handoffs, department jargon, or dual-audience briefs—not external customer or brand copy (communication-lead), contract redlines (commercial-counsel), full multi-team program execution (technical-program-manager), human-language i18n/l10n product strings, or strategy-only consulting without audience reframing (business-consultant).

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use pyramid structure for executives.

    line 85
  2. Distinctive:

    Add RACI when multiple teams share work

    line 94
  3. Distinctive:

    Keep exec sections to one screen.

    line 103

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Cross-Department Translation

When to Use

  • Reframe a message, spec, metric, or decision for a different internal audience
  • Produce dual-audience briefs (e.g., engineering detail + executive summary on one page)
  • Decode department jargon and unstated assumptions before handoff
  • Convert meeting notes into action items by owner with RACI clarity
  • Translate technical specs, incidents, or architecture for business stakeholders
  • Translate business constraints, policy, or financial limits for engineering implementation
  • Draft escalation summaries that each function can act on without re-interpretation
  • Align vocabulary across product, finance, legal, compliance, sales, ops, and actuarial threads

When NOT to Use

  • Company-wide messaging strategy, launches, crisis wording, or brand voice → communication-lead
  • Issue trees, business cases, operating models, or steerCo analysis without audience reframing → business-consultant
  • Multi-team milestones, RAID ownership, dependency maps, launch program governance → technical-program-manager
  • Contract, DPA, or legal redlines and negotiation positions → commercial-counsel
  • Control mapping, audit evidence pipelines, or attestation engineering → compliance-engineer
  • Actuarial engagement SOW, reserve opinions, or regulatory actuarial deliverables → actuarial-consulting
  • Natural-language product localization (locale strings, RTL, cultural adaptation) → route to localization/l10n skills if present
  • Deep technical modeling execution (pricing triangles, IBNR) → actuary

Related skills

NeedSkill
Org-wide narrative, launches, crisis message packscommunication-lead
Strategy, business case, issue trees, operating modelbusiness-consultant
Program plan, RAID, milestones, cross-team deliverytechnical-program-manager
Requirements, BRDs, process maps for build teamsbusiness-analyst
UX scope and product journeysproduct-designer
Technical controls and audit evidencecompliance-engineer
Actuarial engagement framing and stakeholder packsactuarial-consulting
System architecture and ADRssenior-system-architecture
Commercial terms in handoff documentscommercial-counsel

Core Workflows

1. Identify source and target audiences

  1. Source — who wrote this; what they assume the reader knows
  2. Target — who must understand, decide, or execute
  3. Decision or ask — one sentence: what changes if they get it right
  4. Sensitivity — legal, regulatory, financial materiality, security, personnel

Load references/audience_profiles_and_register.md for register, depth, and vocabulary norms.

2. Jargon and assumption pass

Before rewriting:

  1. Highlight terms that are department-local or overloaded (e.g., "platform," "risk," "material")
  2. List implicit assumptions (data exists, approval granted, timeline fixed)
  3. Flag ambiguous metrics (gross vs net, ARR vs revenue, calendar vs fiscal)
  4. Build a mini-glossary only for terms that appear in the artifact

See references/jargon_decoding_and_glossary.md.

3. Requirements and decision briefs

InputTypical outputs
Engineering spec / RFCBusiness summary: outcome, constraints, timeline, cost/risk
Business policy / OKREngineering brief: acceptance criteria, non-goals, dependencies
Finance askProduct/engineering impact: effort bands, trade-offs, measurement
Legal/compliance constraintImplementation checklist: must/must-not, evidence needed

Use pyramid structure for executives; appendices for specialists.

See references/requirements_and_decision_briefs.md.

4. Meeting notes and handoffs

  1. Capture decisions (what was decided, not discussed)
  2. Extract actions with one owner, due date, and definition of done
  3. Separate FYI from needs response
  4. Add RACI when multiple teams share work
  5. Include open questions with who resolves them

See references/meeting_notes_and_handoffs.md.

5. Escalation and executive summaries

Escalations need: situation, impact, options, recommendation, asks by role, and what not to do yet.

Keep exec sections to one screen; link detail for operators.

See references/executive_and_escalation_summaries.md.

Output standards

  • Lead with decision or ask for executive readers; lead with context and constraints for implementers
  • Define acronyms once; prefer plain language over metaphor
  • Separate facts, assumptions, and recommendations
  • Preserve numeric precision; never round material figures without stating basis
  • Tag sections when dual-audience: ## Executive, ## Engineering, ## Finance, etc.
  • Flag [LEGAL REVIEW], [COMPLIANCE], [FINANCE SIGN-OFF] when content touches those domains

When to load references

TopicReference
Scope, boundaries, translation vs other skillsreferences/cross_department_translation_scope.md
Audience profiles, register, depthreferences/audience_profiles_and_register.md
Jargon, glossaries, assumption surfacingreferences/jargon_decoding_and_glossary.md
Specs, decisions, dual-audience briefsreferences/requirements_and_decision_briefs.md
Notes, actions, RACI handoffsreferences/meeting_notes_and_handoffs.md
Exec summaries and escalationsreferences/executive_and_escalation_summaries.md

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.