advanced-short-term-actuarial-mathematics
Skill9 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Guides advanced short-term actuarial mathematics aligned with SOA ASTAM and P&C/health-adjacent modeling—severity and frequency distributions, aggregate and compound loss models, Bühlmann and Bühlmann-Straub credibility, ratemaking and experience rating, short-term reserving at the math level, MLE and goodness-of-fit, and risk measures (VaR, TVaR). Tool-agnostic and concept-first. Use when the user mentions advanced short-term actuarial mathematics, ASTAM, severity model, frequency model, aggregate loss, compound distribution, Bühlmann credibility, experience rating, ratemaking, pure premium, negative binomial frequency, tail factor, TVaR, or short-term actuarial models—not life contingencies (life-health-insurance), Excel workpapers only (actuarial-analyst), appointed actuary sign-off (actuary, appointed-chief-actuary), assumption governance (assumption-setting), P&C legal/operations depth (property-casualty-insurance), or general ML (data-scientist, quantitative-researcher).
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 74
Document moments, tail indices, and parameter stability across segments
- Distinctive: line 94
Document heterogeneity across classes/years and structural parameters
- Distinctive: line 110
Run goodness-of-fit and tail diagnostics.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Advanced Short-Term Actuarial Mathematics
When to Use
- Select and justify severity families (parametric tails, mixtures) and frequency models (Poisson, negative binomial, mixtures)
- Build aggregate loss models: compound distributions, normal approximation limits, FFT/simulation concepts
- Apply credibility (Bühlmann, Bühlmann-Straub, limited fluctuation) and experience rating math
- Structure ratemaking: pure premium, loss ratio, trend, on-level, indicated change logic
- Explain short-term reserving at the mathematical level (chain ladder factors, expected loss ratio)
- Estimate parameters (MLE), run goodness-of-fit and diagnostics, interpret residuals and tail fit
- Compute risk measures (VaR, TVaR) and relate them to capital concepts at a technical level
- Connect modeling choices to pricing and reserving workflows; hand execution to
actuarial-analyst
When NOT to Use
- Life insurance, annuities, long-term care, or life contingencies (mortality, reserves by policy) →
life-health-insuranceor longevity-focused skills - Triangle workbooks, exhibit production, statutory tie-outs, or model run packs only →
actuarial-analyst - Appointed actuary opinions, regulatory sign-off, or enterprise capital policy →
actuary,appointed-chief-actuary - Enterprise assumption governance, assumption papers, and change control →
assumption-setting - P&C coverage wording, claims handling, underwriting authority, or DOI filing narrative →
property-casualty-insurance - Exam cram or past-exam solutions as the sole deliverable (support professional application; exam study is secondary)
- General data science, ML pipelines, or quant research without actuarial loss-model framing →
data-scientist,quantitative-researcher - Chart design and dashboard craft only →
data-visualization - Credential pathway and exam strategy only →
associate-actuary
Related skills
| Need | Skill |
| Workpapers, triangles, exhibits, model I/O, analyst QA | actuarial-analyst |
| Sign-off, capital overview, governance memos | actuary |
| Appointed actuary / chief actuary regulatory framing | appointed-chief-actuary |
| ASA/FSO exam pathways and professional standards | associate-actuary |
| Assumption governance and enterprise change control | assumption-setting |
| P&C lines, underwriting, claims, and policy mechanics | property-casualty-insurance |
| Statistical/ML modeling beyond standard actuarial methods | quantitative-researcher |
| General ML and predictive pipelines | data-scientist |
| Charts, dashboards, and visual design | data-visualization |
Core Workflows
1. Problem framing (ASTAM-aligned)
Before fitting distributions:
- Horizon — Short-term (annual or shorter); accident vs calendar year; prospective period for pricing
- Random variables — Severity (X), frequency (N), aggregate (S=\sum X_i); clarify i.i.d. assumptions
- Data grain — Claim-level vs policy-period; censoring/truncation (deductibles, limits)
- Deliverable — Model spec, parameter estimates, diagnostics, business interpretation—not filing sign-off
- Peer execution — Route spreadsheet builds and filing exhibits to
actuarial-analyst
See references/astam_scope_and_principles.md.
2. Severity and frequency modeling
- Explore severity empirical tail; candidate families (exponential, gamma, lognormal, Pareto, generalized Pareto for tail)
- Explore frequency dispersion; test Poisson vs negative binomial vs mixtures
- Document moments, tail indices, and parameter stability across segments
- State dependence assumptions (usually independence for standard compound model; flag if copula needed → escalate)
- Summarize model selection criteria (AIC/BIC, Anderson–Darling, QQ plots)—not a single automatic pick
See references/severity_and_frequency_models.md.
3. Aggregate and compound losses
- Define compound model (S = X_1 + \cdots + X_N)
- Apply normal approximation when conditions hold; state when it fails (heavy tail, low frequency)
- Outline FFT and simulation approaches for discrete/continuous severity (conceptual steps)
- Relate percentiles of (S) to risk measures and reinsurance layers (technical only)
See references/aggregate_loss_models.md.
4. Credibility and experience rating
- Choose limited fluctuation, Bühlmann, or Bühlmann-Straub per homogeneity and data structure
- Compute credibility weights (Z); define complement (manual, industry, prior)
- Blend observed experience with complement for pure premium or loss ratio
- Document heterogeneity across classes/years and structural parameters
See references/credibility_and_experience_rating.md.
5. Ratemaking and short-term reserving (math level)
- Pure premium indication: frequency × severity with documented adjustments
- Loss ratio and on-level premium; trend to prospective period
- Indicated change vs constraints; distinguish technical indication from implemented rate
- Reserving: chain-ladder factor algebra, expected loss ratio method—link full triangle work to
actuarial-analyst
See references/ratemaking_and_trend.md.
6. Estimation, diagnostics, and risk measures
- Fit via MLE (or method of moments where standard); report standard errors when available
- Run goodness-of-fit and tail diagnostics; document limitations
- Compute VaR and TVaR at stated confidence levels; interpret for capital layers (non-regulatory)
- Package assumptions, alternatives, and sensitivity for actuary review
See references/estimation_diagnostics_and_risk_measures.md.
Deliverable standards
| Deliverable | Minimum content |
| Model specification | Random variables, independence, censoring/truncation, segment definition |
| Parameter table | Estimates, method, uncertainty, stability notes |
| Diagnostics | QQ/PP, GOF tests, tail plot, A/E if applicable |
| Business bridge | Pure premium, credibility blend, indicated change or reserve factor (math only) |
| Limitations | Data volume, tail extrapolation, regime change, outlier treatment |
Label output as technical modeling support, not actuarial opinion, legal advice, or filed regulatory submission.
Assignment type matrix
| Trigger phrase | Primary workflow | Lead reference |
| severity model / tail behavior | Severity families and selection | severity_and_frequency_models.md |
| frequency model / negative binomial | Frequency and dispersion | severity_and_frequency_models.md |
| aggregate loss / compound distribution | Compound (S) | aggregate_loss_models.md |
| Bühlmann credibility | Credibility weights | credibility_and_experience_rating.md |
| experience rating / pure premium | Rating blend | credibility_and_experience_rating.md |
| ratemaking / trend / on-level | Indication math | ratemaking_and_trend.md |
| chain ladder / ELR (math) | Reserving formulas | ratemaking_and_trend.md |
| MLE / goodness-of-fit | Estimation and GOF | estimation_diagnostics_and_risk_measures.md |
| VaR / TVaR | Risk measures | estimation_diagnostics_and_risk_measures.md |
When to load references
- Scope, ASTAM alignment, principles →
references/astam_scope_and_principles.md - Severity and frequency →
references/severity_and_frequency_models.md - Aggregate and compound losses →
references/aggregate_loss_models.md - Credibility and experience rating →
references/credibility_and_experience_rating.md - Ratemaking, trend, reserving math →
references/ratemaking_and_trend.md - Estimation, GOF, VaR/TVaR →
references/estimation_diagnostics_and_risk_measures.md
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- daemon-blockint-tech/Agentic-Enteprises-Skill★ 8100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository197 other files it gives its agents.
- ab-testing-engineerSkill
- actuarial-analystSkill
- actuarial-consultingSkill
- actuarySkill
- advanced-long-term-actuarial-mathematicsSkill
- advanced-persistent-threatSkill
- agentic-ai-developerSkill
- ai-adversarial-robustness-engineerSkill
- ai-context-engineerSkill
- ai-engineerSkill
- ai-lead-opsSkill
- ai-memory-developerSkill
- ai-redteamSkill
- ai-researcherSkill
- ai-risk-governanceSkill
- ai-skill-managerSkill
- ai-token-improvement-plan-engineerSkill
- aml-cftSkill
- aml-complianceSkill
- analytics-data-engineering-manager-productSkill
- analytics-data-engineerSkill
- anti-false-positive-decision-makingSkill
- applied-ai-architect-commercial-enterpriseSkill
- appointed-chief-actuarySkill
- asset-liability-managementSkill
- associate-actuarySkill
- assumption-settingSkill
- auditorSkill
- bcm-disaster-recovery-specialistSkill
- bi-analystSkill
- build-validatorSkill
- business-analystSkill
- business-consultantSkill
- business-model-researcherSkill
- certified-information-systems-security-professionalSkill
- chief-information-security-officerSkill
- ci-cd-engineerSkill
- cicd-engineerSkill
- cisco-certified-network-professionalSkill
- classified-cyber-security-senior-managerSkill
- classified-software-devsecops-engineerSkill
- cloud-architectSkill
- cloud-compliance-specialistSkill
- cloud-economistSkill
- cloud-engineerSkill
- cloud-security-engineerSkill
- cloud-system-administratorSkill
- cluster-deployment-engineerSkill
- code-securitySkill
- commercial-counselSkill
- communication-leadSkill
- community-executive-escalations-program-managerSkill
- compliance-engineerSkill
- compliance-specialistSkill
- compute-accounting-managerSkill
- control-software-developerSkill
- corporate-counselSkill
- country-managerSkill
- cross-department-translationSkill
- cryptographer-specialistSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

