agentleFS
rade-nugrohorade-nugroho/Agentic-Enteprises-Skill/advanced-short-term-actuarial-mathematics/SKILL.md

advanced-short-term-actuarial-mathematics

Skill9 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

Guides advanced short-term actuarial mathematics aligned with SOA ASTAM and P&C/health-adjacent modeling—severity and frequency distributions, aggregate and compound loss models, Bühlmann and Bühlmann-Straub credibility, ratemaking and experience rating, short-term reserving at the math level, MLE and goodness-of-fit, and risk measures (VaR, TVaR). Tool-agnostic and concept-first. Use when the user mentions advanced short-term actuarial mathematics, ASTAM, severity model, frequency model, aggregate loss, compound distribution, Bühlmann credibility, experience rating, ratemaking, pure premium, negative binomial frequency, tail factor, TVaR, or short-term actuarial models—not life contingencies (life-health-insurance), Excel workpapers only (actuarial-analyst), appointed actuary sign-off (actuary, appointed-chief-actuary), assumption governance (assumption-setting), P&C legal/operations depth (property-casualty-insurance), or general ML (data-scientist, quantitative-researcher).

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Document moments, tail indices, and parameter stability across segments

    line 74
  2. Distinctive:

    Document heterogeneity across classes/years and structural parameters

    line 94
  3. Distinctive:

    Run goodness-of-fit and tail diagnostics.

    line 110

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Advanced Short-Term Actuarial Mathematics

When to Use

  • Select and justify severity families (parametric tails, mixtures) and frequency models (Poisson, negative binomial, mixtures)
  • Build aggregate loss models: compound distributions, normal approximation limits, FFT/simulation concepts
  • Apply credibility (Bühlmann, Bühlmann-Straub, limited fluctuation) and experience rating math
  • Structure ratemaking: pure premium, loss ratio, trend, on-level, indicated change logic
  • Explain short-term reserving at the mathematical level (chain ladder factors, expected loss ratio)
  • Estimate parameters (MLE), run goodness-of-fit and diagnostics, interpret residuals and tail fit
  • Compute risk measures (VaR, TVaR) and relate them to capital concepts at a technical level
  • Connect modeling choices to pricing and reserving workflows; hand execution to actuarial-analyst

When NOT to Use

  • Life insurance, annuities, long-term care, or life contingencies (mortality, reserves by policy) → life-health-insurance or longevity-focused skills
  • Triangle workbooks, exhibit production, statutory tie-outs, or model run packs only → actuarial-analyst
  • Appointed actuary opinions, regulatory sign-off, or enterprise capital policy → actuary, appointed-chief-actuary
  • Enterprise assumption governance, assumption papers, and change control → assumption-setting
  • P&C coverage wording, claims handling, underwriting authority, or DOI filing narrative → property-casualty-insurance
  • Exam cram or past-exam solutions as the sole deliverable (support professional application; exam study is secondary)
  • General data science, ML pipelines, or quant research without actuarial loss-model framing → data-scientist, quantitative-researcher
  • Chart design and dashboard craft only → data-visualization
  • Credential pathway and exam strategy only → associate-actuary

Related skills

NeedSkill
Workpapers, triangles, exhibits, model I/O, analyst QAactuarial-analyst
Sign-off, capital overview, governance memosactuary
Appointed actuary / chief actuary regulatory framingappointed-chief-actuary
ASA/FSO exam pathways and professional standardsassociate-actuary
Assumption governance and enterprise change controlassumption-setting
P&C lines, underwriting, claims, and policy mechanicsproperty-casualty-insurance
Statistical/ML modeling beyond standard actuarial methodsquantitative-researcher
General ML and predictive pipelinesdata-scientist
Charts, dashboards, and visual designdata-visualization

Core Workflows

1. Problem framing (ASTAM-aligned)

Before fitting distributions:

  1. Horizon — Short-term (annual or shorter); accident vs calendar year; prospective period for pricing
  2. Random variables — Severity (X), frequency (N), aggregate (S=\sum X_i); clarify i.i.d. assumptions
  3. Data grain — Claim-level vs policy-period; censoring/truncation (deductibles, limits)
  4. Deliverable — Model spec, parameter estimates, diagnostics, business interpretation—not filing sign-off
  5. Peer execution — Route spreadsheet builds and filing exhibits to actuarial-analyst

See references/astam_scope_and_principles.md.

2. Severity and frequency modeling

  1. Explore severity empirical tail; candidate families (exponential, gamma, lognormal, Pareto, generalized Pareto for tail)
  2. Explore frequency dispersion; test Poisson vs negative binomial vs mixtures
  3. Document moments, tail indices, and parameter stability across segments
  4. State dependence assumptions (usually independence for standard compound model; flag if copula needed → escalate)
  5. Summarize model selection criteria (AIC/BIC, Anderson–Darling, QQ plots)—not a single automatic pick

See references/severity_and_frequency_models.md.

3. Aggregate and compound losses

  1. Define compound model (S = X_1 + \cdots + X_N)
  2. Apply normal approximation when conditions hold; state when it fails (heavy tail, low frequency)
  3. Outline FFT and simulation approaches for discrete/continuous severity (conceptual steps)
  4. Relate percentiles of (S) to risk measures and reinsurance layers (technical only)

See references/aggregate_loss_models.md.

4. Credibility and experience rating

  1. Choose limited fluctuation, Bühlmann, or Bühlmann-Straub per homogeneity and data structure
  2. Compute credibility weights (Z); define complement (manual, industry, prior)
  3. Blend observed experience with complement for pure premium or loss ratio
  4. Document heterogeneity across classes/years and structural parameters

See references/credibility_and_experience_rating.md.

5. Ratemaking and short-term reserving (math level)

  1. Pure premium indication: frequency × severity with documented adjustments
  2. Loss ratio and on-level premium; trend to prospective period
  3. Indicated change vs constraints; distinguish technical indication from implemented rate
  4. Reserving: chain-ladder factor algebra, expected loss ratio method—link full triangle work to actuarial-analyst

See references/ratemaking_and_trend.md.

6. Estimation, diagnostics, and risk measures

  1. Fit via MLE (or method of moments where standard); report standard errors when available
  2. Run goodness-of-fit and tail diagnostics; document limitations
  3. Compute VaR and TVaR at stated confidence levels; interpret for capital layers (non-regulatory)
  4. Package assumptions, alternatives, and sensitivity for actuary review

See references/estimation_diagnostics_and_risk_measures.md.

Deliverable standards

DeliverableMinimum content
Model specificationRandom variables, independence, censoring/truncation, segment definition
Parameter tableEstimates, method, uncertainty, stability notes
DiagnosticsQQ/PP, GOF tests, tail plot, A/E if applicable
Business bridgePure premium, credibility blend, indicated change or reserve factor (math only)
LimitationsData volume, tail extrapolation, regime change, outlier treatment

Label output as technical modeling support, not actuarial opinion, legal advice, or filed regulatory submission.

Assignment type matrix

Trigger phrasePrimary workflowLead reference
severity model / tail behaviorSeverity families and selectionseverity_and_frequency_models.md
frequency model / negative binomialFrequency and dispersionseverity_and_frequency_models.md
aggregate loss / compound distributionCompound (S)aggregate_loss_models.md
Bühlmann credibilityCredibility weightscredibility_and_experience_rating.md
experience rating / pure premiumRating blendcredibility_and_experience_rating.md
ratemaking / trend / on-levelIndication mathratemaking_and_trend.md
chain ladder / ELR (math)Reserving formulasratemaking_and_trend.md
MLE / goodness-of-fitEstimation and GOFestimation_diagnostics_and_risk_measures.md
VaR / TVaRRisk measuresestimation_diagnostics_and_risk_measures.md

When to load references

  • Scope, ASTAM alignment, principles → references/astam_scope_and_principles.md
  • Severity and frequency → references/severity_and_frequency_models.md
  • Aggregate and compound losses → references/aggregate_loss_models.md
  • Credibility and experience rating → references/credibility_and_experience_rating.md
  • Ratemaking, trend, reserving math → references/ratemaking_and_trend.md
  • Estimation, GOF, VaR/TVaR → references/estimation_diagnostics_and_risk_measures.md

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

Reviews can't be read right now.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.