agentleFS
rade-nugrohorade-nugroho/Agentic-Enteprises-Skill/auditor/SKILL.md

auditor

Skill9 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

This skill should be used when the user asks to plan or execute internal audit, IT audit, risk-based audit planning, control testing, audit evidence, workpaper documentation, SOC 2 audit support, SOX ITGC testing, walkthroughs, operating effectiveness, deficiency or finding write-ups, remediation retest, or audit report summaries for management or the audit committee. Guides assurance engagements—scoping, framework mapping (COSO, COBIT concepts, SOC 2 trust criteria), design vs operating effectiveness, sampling, ITGC themes (access, change, operations), vendor audit coordination, and governance reporting—not penetration testing (security-engineer, ai-redteam), building controls from scratch (compliance-engineer), legal interpretation (commercial-counsel), PCAOB financial statement audit detail, or blockchain investigation.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 4

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Document exceptions, root cause, and deficiency severity

    line 24
  2. Distinctive:

    Test ITGC themes: logical access, change management, computer operations

    line 26
  3. Distinctive:

    Document control narratives.

    line 71
  4. Distinctive:

    Document root cause, impact, and recommendation

    line 91

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Auditor

When to Use

  • Plan risk-based internal or IT audits — universe, scope memo, timing, resources
  • Map controls to COSO, COBIT concepts, or SOC 2 trust criteria at a high level
  • Perform walkthroughs and assess control design vs operating effectiveness
  • Design sampling methodology and audit evidence standards
  • Build test procedures and structured workpapers
  • Document exceptions, root cause, and deficiency severity
  • Draft management action plans and plan remediation retest
  • Test ITGC themes: logical access, change management, computer operations
  • Coordinate third-party / vendor audit evidence and bridge to SOC reports
  • Prepare audit committee or management audit report summaries

When NOT to Use

  • Authorized penetration testing, red team, or offensive security findings → penetration-tester, ai-redteam, security-engineer
  • Implement technical controls, evidence pipelines, or CCM automation → compliance-engineer
  • GRC program charter, gap plans, questionnaire libraries without test execution → compliance-specialist
  • Legal interpretation of regulations, contracts, or DPAs → commercial-counsel
  • PCAOB financial statement audit procedures, journal testing, or full SOX 404 financial ICFR detail (unless user scopes ITGC/SOX-adjacent IT only)
  • Blockchain investigation, on-chain forensics, or crypto compliance tracing → blockint / investigation skills
  • Build security architecture or IAM implementation → information-security-engineer
  • Program delivery, RAID logs, and cross-team milestone tracking without audit lens → technical-program-manager

Related skills

NeedSkill
Technical control implementation and evidence automationcompliance-engineer
GRC scope, gap plans, assessor prep, questionnaire librariescompliance-specialist
Cloud framework evidence and residencycloud-compliance-specialist
IAM, logging, encryption implementationinformation-security-engineer
Contracts, DPAs, regulatory legal interpretationcommercial-counsel
Cross-functional delivery, dependencies, status cadencetechnical-program-manager
SOX sample selection and financial control testing patternsaudit-support (personal skill)
Security program strategycybersecurity
Pentest factual input (not attestation)penetration-tester

Core Workflows

1. Engagement initiation and scoping

  1. Confirm engagement type (internal, IT, integrated, follow-up)
  2. Obtain charter, prior reports, risk register, and regulatory/customer drivers
  3. Build audit universe and risk assessment; prioritize by inherent risk and last test date
  4. Draft scope memo: objectives, systems, periods, exclusions, reliance on third parties
  5. Align calendar with external audit, SOC observation period, or certification windows

See references/auditor_scope.md and references/audit_planning_and_risk.md.

2. Control understanding and framework mapping

  1. Identify process owner and key systems
  2. Map process to control objectives (COSO components / SOC 2 criteria as agreed)
  3. Document control narratives; distinguish preventive vs detective, manual vs automated
  4. Perform walkthrough (trace sample transaction end-to-end)
  5. Conclude on design effectiveness before operating tests

See references/control_frameworks_and_mapping.md.

3. Test planning and execution

  1. Link each control to risk, assertion (if SOX-adjacent), and test objective
  2. Select sample approach (random, haphazard, judgmental, full population for automated)
  3. Execute procedures: inspect, observe, inquire, re-perform
  4. Index evidence with workpaper cross-references; note exceptions immediately
  5. Escalate scope changes or control failures to engagement lead

See references/testing_evidence_workpapers.md.

4. Findings, remediation, and retest

  1. Classify exceptions: isolated vs pervasive; design vs operating
  2. Assign deficiency level (see reference severity matrix)
  3. Document root cause, impact, and recommendation
  4. Agree management action plan: owner, target date, compensating controls
  5. Retest remediated controls; close only with sufficient evidence

See references/findings_remediation_retest.md.

5. Reporting and governance

  1. Draft executive summary: opinion-style conclusion for scope, key themes, trend
  2. List findings by severity with agreed actions
  3. Prepare audit committee or management slides; separate detail appendix
  4. Track open items through next cycle; feed annual audit plan

See references/reporting_governance_third_party.md.

Outputs

  • Audit plan — universe, risk ratings, scope, timing, staffing
  • Walkthrough memo — process flow, controls, design conclusion
  • Test program — procedures, samples, results per control
  • Workpaper index — evidence list, preparer/reviewer, sign-off
  • Finding sheet — condition, criteria, cause, effect, recommendation, severity
  • Management action plan — owner, date, status, retest notes
  • Audit report — summary for AC/management with appendices as needed

Principles

  • Risk-based — effort follows inherent and residual risk, not checkbox coverage
  • Criteria first — every finding cites the control objective or framework requirement
  • Evidence sufficiency — document what was tested, not only what passed
  • Independence — escalate pressure to narrow scope without documentation
  • Separate roles — auditors test; owners remediate; engineers implement (hand off to compliance-engineer when build is required)

Reference map

TopicFile
Role boundaries and engagement typesreferences/auditor_scope.md
Universe, risk assessment, annual planreferences/audit_planning_and_risk.md
COSO, COBIT, SOC 2 mappingreferences/control_frameworks_and_mapping.md
Sampling, evidence, workpapersreferences/testing_evidence_workpapers.md
Findings, MAP, retestreferences/findings_remediation_retest.md
Reporting, AC, vendorsreferences/reporting_governance_third_party.md

Disclaimer

This skill supports audit planning and documentation workflows. It does not provide legal, accounting, or attestation advice. Qualified internal audit, external audit, or legal professionals must review conclusions before issuance to regulators, customers, or the board.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

Reviews can't be read right now.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.