agentleFS
rade-nugrohorade-nugroho/Agentic-Enteprises-Skill/compliance-engineer/SKILL.md

compliance-engineer

Skill9 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

Guides compliance engineering—mapping regulatory and framework requirements to technical controls, automating audit evidence, continuous compliance monitoring, gap remediation tracking, and audit-ready documentation for security and privacy programs (SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR technical measures, HIPAA safeguards, PCI scope boundaries, NIST CSF). Use when implementing audit controls, evidence pipelines, continuous monitoring, auditor packages, testable policy checks, or pre-attestation remediation—not non-engineering GRC (compliance-specialist), contracts (commercial-counsel), DC commissioning (data-center-design-execution-lead), financial SOX journals (senior-revenue-accountant), security strategy without audit lens (cybersecurity), CI scans only (devsecops), or AI model classification (ai-risk-governance).

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Document exclusions with risk acceptance

    line 67
  2. Distinctive:

    Avoid controls that cannot be evidenced automatically or manually on schedule.

    line 83
  3. Distinctive:

    Run gap analysis against chosen framework

    line 113
  4. Distinctive:

    Verify fix with re-test and attach proof

    line 116

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Compliance Engineer

When to Use

  • Map security, privacy, or operational frameworks to technical controls
  • Build audit evidence pipelines from infrastructure, CI/CD, IdP, or ticketing systems
  • Design continuous control monitoring and exception workflows
  • Prepare evidence packages and remediation tracking for SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, PCI, or NIST CSF
  • Translate policy requirements into testable engineering checks

When NOT to Use

  • Contract negotiation, DPAs, or commercial redlines → commercial-counsel
  • Corporate governance, board approvals, or entity matters → corporate-counsel
  • Financial close controls, journal entries, or SOX accounting evidence → senior-revenue-accountant
  • Broad security strategy without audit/control mapping → cybersecurity
  • CI/CD scan configuration without compliance evidence requirements → devsecops
  • Cloud-only framework evidence, residency, FedRAMP/PCI in AWS/GCP/Azure → cloud-compliance-specialist
  • GRC program charter, gap plans, audit prep, vendor questionnaires (non-technical) → compliance-specialist
  • Execute authorized penetration tests or write offensive findings → penetration-tester

Related skills

NeedSkill
GRC program, scope, gap plans, audit coordinationcompliance-specialist
Cloud SOC/HIPAA/PCI evidence and CSPM mappingcloud-compliance-specialist
Infrastructure capex SOX and asset controlsdirector-infrastructure-capex-accounting
Security program and IR strategycybersecurity
CI gates, SBOM, SSDF evidence from pipelinesdevsecops
IAM, encryption, guardrail implementationinformation-security-engineer
Access reviews, entitlement catalog, SoD evidence designiam-specialist
Data governance and privacy architecturedata-architect
AI system risk tiers and model governanceai-risk-governance
Enterprise cloud controls and residency designenterprise-cloud-architect
Privacy research for safeguard pipelinesprivacy-research-engineer-safeguards
Financial SOX control testingsenior-revenue-accountant
Commercial contract review and negotiationcommercial-counsel
Pentest reports (factual input to audits, not attestation)penetration-tester
Corporate governance, entity, board packagescorporate-counsel
HRIS access reviews, training completion opspeople-operations-specialist
Physical DC design and commissioning evidencedata-center-design-execution-lead
Incident artifact analysis and forensic investigation reports (factual)digital-forensics-analyst
Security risk registers, inherent/residual scoring, acceptancessecurity-risk-analyst

Core Workflows

1. Framework scoping

  1. Identify in-scope systems, data classes, and subprocessors
  2. Select frameworks (e.g., SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, PCI)
  3. Define trust service criteria / Annex A controls in scope
  4. Document exclusions with risk acceptance
  5. Align calendar: observation period, audit windows, evidence cutoffs

See references/framework_scoping.md for common scope boundaries.

2. Control design and mapping

Translate each control to testable technical implementation:

LayerExamples
PolicyApproved access policy
ProcessQuarterly access review ticket
TechnicalSSO enforced; IAM policy as code
EvidenceIdP export + review sign-off

Avoid controls that cannot be evidenced automatically or manually on schedule.

See references/control_mapping.md for SOC 2 / ISO mapping patterns.

3. Evidence automation

control ID → evidence source (API, Git, SIEM) → collector → storage → reviewer attestation

Evidence quality rules:

  • Timestamped, tamper-evident storage
  • Named owner per control
  • Sample size documented for population controls
  • Redact customer PII in shared audit folders

See references/evidence_automation.md for source catalog and collection cadence.

4. Continuous control monitoring

  • Detect drift from baseline (public buckets, open SGs, missing MFA)
  • Alert owners before audit finding
  • Integrate CSPM, Git policy checks, and HRIS for joiner/leaver
  • Weekly dashboard: pass/fail per control, trend

See references/continuous_monitoring.md for CCM metrics and alert routing.

5. Gap assessment and remediation

  1. Run gap analysis against chosen framework
  2. Classify: missing control, partial, implemented
  3. Assign remediation with owner, due date, evidence plan
  4. Verify fix with re-test and attach proof
  5. Track exceptions with expiry and approver

See references/audit_readiness.md for pre-audit checklist.

6. Auditor engagement (engineering)

Prepare evidence packages per control family:

  • Access (IdP, reviews, privileged accounts)
  • Change management (PR approvals, deploy logs)
  • Vulnerability management (scan reports, SLAs)
  • Logging and monitoring (retention config, alert samples)
  • Vendor risk (subprocessor list, reviews)

Provide narrative only where logs are insufficient; prefer primary artifacts.

See references/audit_readiness.md for walkthrough agenda and FAQ for auditors.

7. Privacy engineering hooks (GDPR-style)

Coordinate with data-architect for:

  • Data inventory and lawful basis documentation
  • DSR workflows (access/delete) with engineering tickets
  • DPIA triggers for new processing
  • Cross-border transfer mechanisms (SCCs, etc.) as documented requirements—not legal advice

When to load references

  • Scope and frameworks → references/framework_scoping.md
  • Control mapping → references/control_mapping.md
  • Evidence collectors → references/evidence_automation.md
  • Drift and CCM → references/continuous_monitoring.md
  • Audit prep → references/audit_readiness.md

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

Reviews can't be read right now.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.