agentleFS
peterbamuhigirepeterbamuhigire/chwezi-dev-engine/skills/finance-accounting/accounting-finance-controller/SKILL.md

accounting-finance-controller

Skill31 starsChanged 18 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when coordinating accounting and finance implementation reviews, doctrine routing, control evidence, remediation priorities, and release decisions across a software system.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Default to read-only coordination.

    line 42
  2. Distinctive:

    Every money movement must have a business event, source document, accounting treatment, posting rule, control, reconciliation path, and …

    line 73
  3. Distinctive:

    Add controls: segregation of duties, maker-checker approvals, immutable audit logs, period locks, role permissions, exception queues, …

    line 81
  4. Distinctive:

    No posted transaction can be edited or deleted.

    line 96

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Accounting Finance Controller

<!-- dual-compat-start -->

Evidence Produced

CategoryArtifactFormatExample
CorrectnessController review and reconciliation packMarkdown/workbooktrial balance, control exceptions, reconciliations, approvals, close status, and unresolved items
<!-- dual-compat-end -->

Inputs

ArtefactRequired?Purpose
System scope and finance risk registeryesSelect doctrine and controls
Implementation and reconciliation evidenceyesDetermine actual readiness
Release decision and ownersyesAssign remediation and approval

Outputs

ArtefactConsumerAcceptance condition
Controller assessment and routed work planEngineering and finance ownersEvidence-backed findings, owners, priorities, verdict

Capability contract

Default to read-only coordination. Ledger mutation, migration, close, filing, or production correction requires separately authorised execution through the owning skill and finance approver.

Degraded mode

Fallback without doctrine or implementation evidence: issue Needs Evidence; do not approve the system or fabricate compliance.

Decision rules

FindingRouteRelease effect
Doctrine uncertaintyExternal accounting doctrineHold affected decision
Posting or reconciliation defectaccounting-engineBlock affected financial flow
Evidence complete and controls effectiveController approvalProceed with recorded residual risks

Domain anti-patterns

  • Approving from design prose alone. Fix: require implementation and reconciliation evidence.
  • Mixing policy ownership with code ownership. Fix: route doctrine and implementation separately.
  • Treating an unreconciled balance as immaterial by default. Fix: quantify and approve thresholds.
  • Hiding unresolved findings in a narrative. Fix: record owner, severity, due date, and release effect.
  • Performing production corrections during review. Fix: use a separately authorised remediation workflow.
  • Accepting gaps, resets or deletions in invoice, credit-note or journal numbers. Fix: one contiguous series per tenant and document type, voids kept and shown (tenant-document-numbering).

Use When

  • Designing or implementing financial modules for POS, ERP, SaaS, school fees, healthcare billing, inventory, payroll, project accounting, fixed assets, procurement, or mobile-money-heavy systems.
  • Reviewing business plans, proposals, dashboards, spreadsheets, or systems where accounting accuracy, financial controls, investor confidence, or management reporting matter.
  • The user wants outputs that feel credible to CFOs, accountants, auditors, lenders, investors, or senior executives.

Core Rule

Every money movement must have a business event, source document, accounting treatment, posting rule, control, reconciliation path, and report destination. If any link is missing, the system is not finance-ready.

Workflow

  1. Identify the entity type, industry, reporting basis, currency, tax context, transaction volumes, user roles, and whether IFRS/statutory reporting is required.
  2. Map business events to ledgers: sales, receipts, purchases, payments, inventory, payroll, tax, fixed assets, loans, owner equity, journals, adjustments, accruals, prepayments, and reversals.
  3. Define the chart of accounts, accounting dimensions, control accounts, subledgers, fiscal periods, document numbers, posting rules, and period-close workflow.
  4. Build management accounting: cost objects, cost drivers, cost centers, profit centers, contribution margin, CVP, budgets, flexible budgets, variance analysis, and responsibility-center reporting.
  5. Add controls: segregation of duties, maker-checker approvals, immutable audit logs, period locks, role permissions, exception queues, reconciliation evidence, and reversal-only correction.
  6. Design reports: trial balance, general ledger, P&L, balance sheet, cash flow, aging, inventory valuation, tax schedules, management accounts, dashboards, and board packs.
  7. Validate with accounting gates: balanced journals, subledger-to-GL reconciliation, tax timing, inventory costing, cash/bank proof, period close, and model checks.

Accounting Coverage

  • Financial accounting: double-entry, accruals, revenue, expenses, assets, liabilities, equity, financial statements, disclosures, consolidation where relevant.
  • Cost accounting: direct/indirect costs, fixed/variable costs, cost drivers, job/process/hybrid costing, ABC, standard costing, CVP, margin of safety, transfer pricing.
  • Management control: budgets, responsibility centers, KPIs, performance measurement, incentives, project controls, decentralization, and management reporting cadence.
  • IFRS-aware design: accounting policies, estimates, errors, events after reporting date, inventories, PPE, leases, impairment, provisions, financial instruments, cash flow, fair value, and disclosure readiness.
  • Advanced accounting: business combinations, goodwill, non-controlling interests, intercompany eliminations, equity method, foreign currency, and group reporting where relevant.
  • Quantitative finance: NPV, IRR, payback, effective interest rates, discounting, sensitivity analysis, scenario modelling, risk-return logic, and data-driven forecast checks.

Quality Gates

  • No posted transaction can be edited or deleted; corrections use reversals and adjustment entries.
  • Debits equal credits at transaction, batch, period, tenant, and consolidated levels.
  • Subledgers reconcile to GL control accounts: AR, AP, inventory, fixed assets, payroll, tax, loans, and bank/mobile money.
  • Reports must be reproducible from source transactions, not manually typed summaries.
  • Financial projections must connect to operational drivers, not arbitrary growth percentages.
  • Budgets compare actuals to flexible budgets, not only static targets.
  • Investor or lender numbers must reconcile across narrative, tables, cash flow, balance sheet, funding request, and appendices.

References

  • references/professional-accounting-systems-gate.md - detailed checklists for system requirements, IFRS-aware reporting, management accounting, projections, controls, and review.
  • Companion skill: saas-accounting-system for double-entry implementation patterns and schema-level design.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.