agentleFS
peterbamuhigirepeterbamuhigire/chwezi-dev-engine/skills/ai/ai-observability-and-debugging/SKILL.md

ai-observability-and-debugging

Skill31 starsChanged 18 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when building the observability stack for AI features in a multi-tenant SaaS — prompt/response tracing, semantic logging, replay tooling, "show me why this answer", per-stage latency/cost breakdown, ticket→trace tie-back, and dashboards that answer the operational questions (which tenant, which feature, which prompt version, which model).

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Default to read-only analysis.

    line 36
  2. Distinctive:

    When required telemetry, evidence, execution, network access, or write authority is unavailable, return a partial result with each …

    line 40
  3. Distinctive:

    Every AI request has a single trace covering all stages and the provider call.

    line 95
  4. Distinctive:

    No request_id propagation to the provider — can't correlate provider-side incidents.

    line 105
  5. Very specific:

    Every AI feature surfaces a copyable request_id (often the last 8 chars) in the UI as a small badge or in a "report issue" flow.

    line 201
  6. Distinctive:

    No way to see retrieval chunks in the operator UI.

    line 229

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

AI Observability and Debugging

Operating contract

Inputs

InputRequiredPurpose
Domain evidenceyestrace identifiers, prompt/model versions, tenant privacy rules, stage boundaries, retention policy, and incident questions

Outputs

  • Produce: trace schema, dashboards, replay procedure, redaction controls, alert rules, and ticket-to-trace workflow.

Skill-specific outputs:

  • AI trace schema spec.
  • Gateway span instrumentation.
  • Replay CLI + back-office UI.
  • "Show me why" UX patterns.
  • Ticket-trace linking workflow.
  • Dashboard set.

Capability and permission boundaries

Default to read-only analysis. Read only scoped records; redact secrets and regulated data. Writes, execution, network calls, production configuration, customer communication, billing changes, and delegation require explicit authority and an identified owner. Never widen tenant, time-window, or system scope implicitly.

Degraded mode

When required telemetry, evidence, execution, network access, or write authority is unavailable, return a partial result with each unassessed item labelled, preserve the safest existing state, and state the evidence or approval needed to continue. Never convert missing evidence into a pass.

Decision rules

ConditionAction
Scope, owner, or threshold is missingStop the affected decision and request it
Evidence is incomplete but read-only analysis is safeProduce a qualified partial result and gap list
A mutation exceeds authority or tenant boundaryBlock it and route for approval
Evidence meets the stated thresholdIssue the output with provenance and owner

Anti-Patterns

  • Treating absent evidence as success. Fix: mark the check unassessed and name the missing source.
  • Expanding one tenant or workflow to all tenants. Fix: enforce supplied scope at every query and action.
  • Performing a production write during analysis. Fix: emit a reviewed change plan until authority is explicit.
  • Reporting a metric without population, window, or source. Fix: attach all three.
  • Hiding a failed threshold inside an average. Fix: report failure slices and the remediation owner.

Acknowledgement: Shared by Peter Bamuhigire, techguypeter.com, +256 784 464178.

<!-- dual-compat-start -->

Use When

  • A support ticket arrives saying "this answer is wrong" and you need to pull up the exact prompt, model, retrieval state, and reasoning in < 2 minutes.
  • Building the AI tracing schema (OTel + custom attributes) so every request can be replayed and explained.
  • Wiring debugging surfaces in the back-office and (for some products) tenant-facing "show me why".
  • Diagnosing a latency or cost regression with the per-stage breakdown.

Do Not Use When

  • The task is generic platform observability — observability-monitoring.
  • The task is the eval harness — ai-eval-harness.
  • The task is the audit log as compliance record — that's a separate lens (ai-on-saas-architecture §5).

Required Inputs

  • Gateway emits per-stage spans (ai-model-gateway).
  • AI audit log writes synchronously per request.
  • A trace backend (OTel + Jaeger/Tempo/Honeycomb) and a logs backend.
  • Back-office tooling baseline (saas-admin-backoffice-tooling).

Workflow

  1. Read this SKILL.md.
  2. Define the AI trace schema (§1) — span names, attributes, conventions.
  3. Wire per-stage spans in the gateway pipeline (§2).
  4. Implement replay tooling (§3) — exact reproduction from a trace.
  5. Build "show me why" surfaces (§4) — per-request explanation.
  6. Build ticket → trace tie-back (§5) — every customer report links to a trace.
  7. Build the operational dashboards (§6).
  8. Apply anti-patterns (§7).

Quality Standards

  • Every AI request has a single trace covering all stages and the provider call.
  • Trace attributes are stable and documented; dashboards never break from renames.
  • Replay reproduces the original output deterministically within tolerance (modulo provider non-determinism).
  • Support ticket → root-cause time < 15 minutes for typical cases.
  • Per-stage latency and cost are queryable; not hidden in unstructured logs.

Anti-Patterns

  • Single span "ai.call" with no breakdown. Latency mystery; no diagnosis.
  • Logging full prompts to plaintext logs accessible to all engineers.
  • No request_id propagation to the provider — can't correlate provider-side incidents.
  • Replay tool that calls live providers — distorts production cost and rate limits.
  • Per-tenant dashboards that aggregate everything; no drill into a specific request.
  • "Show me why" that's a model-generated rationalisation rather than actual citations + retrieval traces.

Evidence Produced

CategoryArtifactFormatExample
OperabilityTrace schemaMarkdowndocs/ai/trace-schema.md
OperabilityReplay CLICode + docstools/ai/replay.py
OperabilityPer-feature ops dashboardDashboard linkdocs/ai/dashboards/feature-ops.md
OperabilityTriage runbookRunbookdocs/runbooks/ai-triage.md

References

  • references/trace-schema.md — span names, attributes, examples.
  • Companion: ai-on-saas-architecture, ai-model-gateway, ai-eval-harness, ai-prompt-injection-and-tenant-safety, observability-monitoring, saas-admin-backoffice-tooling.
  • Incident-mode: during a paged AI incident, the trace and replay tooling must support a one-command evidence bundle export (ai-evidence-export --signal <id> --window <range> --output <dir>) that snapshots state-at-window-end (prompt/model/index/price registries), pulls a stratified sample of failing traces, and generates reproduce scripts. See ai-incident-evidence-capture/references/evidence-bundle-spec.md for the schema and ai-incident-evidence-capture/references/reproduce-script-template.md for the script generator. The replay tooling must support a "show me everything from <time> for <tenant> on <feature>" mode usable by an on-call engineer at T+5 of an incident.
<!-- dual-compat-end -->

§1 AI Trace Schema

A standard ai.* namespace under OpenTelemetry semantic conventions. See references/trace-schema.md for the full schema. Summary:

  • Root span: ai.gateway.request
  • Children: ai.entitlement, ai.kill_switch, ai.rate_limit, ai.caps, ai.prompt.render, ai.safety.in, ai.retrieval, ai.provider.call, ai.safety.out, ai.cost, ai.audit.
  • Attributes on root: ai.tenant_id, ai.feature, ai.prompt_id, ai.prompt_version, ai.model_used, ai.region, ai.tokens_in, ai.tokens_out, ai.usd_cost, ai.fallback_used.

§2 Per-Stage Spans

Each pipeline stage produces a span with:

  • service.name = "llm-gateway"
  • ai.stage = "<name>"
  • ai.outcome = "ok|denied|error"
  • duration
with tracer.start_as_current_span("ai.entitlement") as span:
    span.set_attribute("ai.stage", "entitlement")
    span.set_attribute("ai.tenant_id", ctx.tenant_id)
    span.set_attribute("ai.feature", ctx.feature)
    try:
        await entitlements.check(ctx)
        span.set_attribute("ai.outcome", "ok")
    except NotEntitled as e:
        span.set_attribute("ai.outcome", "denied")
        span.set_attribute("ai.denial_key", e.key)
        raise

Traces export to OTel; sampled at 100% for AI traces by default (volumes are low enough; signal is critical). Reduce sampling once volume scales.

§3 Replay

Given a request_id, the replay tool:

  1. Pulls the full audit row from ai_requests + S3 payload.
  2. Pulls the resolved binding at the time of the request (snapshot in payload).
  3. Reconstructs the exact gateway input.
  4. Runs the gateway pipeline in replay mode:
    • Real provider call OR replayed provider response (from payload).
    • Same prompt version, same KB partition, same model.
    • Same safety classifier version.
  5. Diffs the response with the original; shows differences.

Two modes:

  • --with-provider: re-issue to provider (costs money; useful for "is this still broken?").
  • --from-cache: use stored provider response (free; useful for analysing pipeline changes).

CLI: replay --request-id ai_req_01HXY... --mode from-cache

Replay is read-only; never charges credits, never affects metrics.

§4 "Show Me Why" Surfaces

Two audiences:

Back-office operator view: full trace, payload, retrieval chunks with scores, safety findings, judge-LLM score (if sampled). Filterable by tenant, feature, time, error class. Drill from a customer ticket.

Tenant admin view (optional, premium): for each AI answer, an "explain" affordance that shows:

  • The retrieval chunks used (with snippets, scores, sources).
  • The prompt template id and version.
  • The model used.
  • The grounding score and citations.

Hide:

  • The platform system prompt.
  • Any internal classifier scores.
  • Cost.

Make tenant-facing explanations always derived from the audit log; never re-generated by the model (that would be the model rationalising, not explaining).

§5 Ticket → Trace Tie-Back

Every AI feature surfaces a copyable request_id (often the last 8 chars) in the UI as a small badge or in a "report issue" flow. The support tool accepts the id and:

  1. Resolves the audit row.
  2. Renders the operator view.
  3. Links to the trace.
  4. Links to the replay tool.

For high-volume features, also expose a "feedback?" thumbs-up/down per response, recorded with the request_id.

§6 Dashboards

Standard set per feature:

DashboardPanels
Feature opsQPS, p50/p95/p99 latency by stage, error rate by stage, fallback ratio, abstain rate
CostUSD per hour, per tenant top-20, per model, per feature share
Qualityfaithfulness, correctness, citation density, judge agreement (rolling)
Safetyinjection detect rate, output blocks, tool denials, jailbreak suspicions
Tenant viewper-tenant requests, cost, errors, denials, top features

Each panel filterable by time, tenant, region, model, prompt version.

§7 Anti-Patterns

  • Mixing AI traces with general request traces with no namespace — discoverability rot.
  • Storing payloads in trace attributes (massive cardinality, cost). Use S3 with a key in attributes.
  • Logging full prompt to stdout (printed to log aggregator with no redaction). PII leak.
  • No way to see retrieval chunks in the operator UI. Half the diagnosis missing.
  • Dashboards built once by a single engineer; no shared template. Drift across features.
  • Replay tool that uses the current price table to compute cost on historical replays. Misleading.
  • Sampling at < 10% on AI requests. AI volume is usually small enough to keep 100%.

§8 Agent Trace Patterns

Single-request AI observability is insufficient for agentic features. An agent task is one trace spanning many LLM calls and tool calls, often running for minutes or hours. The trace schema, replay tooling, and task-level dashboards live in ai-agent-observability-and-replay.

Key differences from request-level traces:

DimensionRequestAgent task
Trace lifetimesecondsseconds to days
Spans per trace5-2050-500+
Replayre-call with same inputsre-run loop with mocked tool I/O
Failure modeslatency, content, cost+ step-loop, hallucinated tool args, off-script irreversibles, deadlock
Dashboardsper-request metricsper-task metrics: success rate, intervention rate, step efficiency

Required schema additions when agents are in scope — root span agent.task with attributes for agent.task.id, agent.feature, agent.prompt.version, agent.tool_set.version, agent.task.steps.used/budget, agent.task.usd.total, agent.task.terminal.state. Per-step child spans agent.step.N. Per-LLM-call and per-tool-call sub-spans. Special spans: agent.handoff, agent.approval. Full schema: ai-agent-observability-and-replay/references/trace-schema-agent.md.

Required dashboards: per-feature task success rate, intervention rate, irreversible-action rate, step efficiency, median cost per completed task; per-tenant agent task volume, agent cost share, wasted-spend share; top-10 tasks by cost in last hour; failure-mode distribution.

Required replay surface: per-task replay re-running a recorded task with candidate prompt/model/tool version; side-by-side step diff; never call live tools in replay.

§9 Read Next

  • ai-agent-observability-and-replay — the agent-specific complement with full trace schema, replay tooling, task viewer, and "what would the agent do differently" debugger.
  • ai-agent-runtime-architecture — emits the task-level trace events.
  • ai-agent-eval — consumes traces for replay-based eval.
  • ai-on-saas-architecture — control-plane positioning.
  • ai-model-gateway — instrumented from.
  • ai-eval-harness — surfaces quality signal to dashboards.
  • ai-prompt-injection-and-tenant-safety — safety signals to dashboards.
  • observability-monitoring — broader observability.
  • saas-admin-backoffice-tooling — operator UI.

Consolidated Child References

  • Load references/routing.md to map retired AI child skill slugs to their reference modules.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.