observability-monitoring
Skill31 starsChanged 18 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when designing or reviewing logs, metrics, traces, alerts, SLOs, dashboards, audit events, or production telemetry for web apps, APIs, SaaS platforms, mobile backends, and AI systems. Covers instrumentation strategy, diagnosis-first telemetry, alert quality, and operational visibility.
6 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- AnastasiyaW/codex-claude-code-configtheir own version, first seen Oct 30, 2026
- nassaj2011/claude-skills-for-chatgpttheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- AnastasiyaW/claude-code-configtheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- zavora-ai/skill-observability-monitoringtheir own version, first seen May 31, 2026
- yiweiwan/skillstheir own version, first seen May 12, 2026
- fabioc-aloha/alex-cognitive-architecturetheir own version, first seen Apr 26, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use frontend-design.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
BlockSkillfrontend-design
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, or applications. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions6 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 6
- AnastasiyaW/claude-code-config★ 214same name
- AnastasiyaW/codex-claude-code-config★ 214same name
- yiweiwan/skills★ 1same name
- zavora-ai/skill-observability-monitoring★ 1same name
- fabioc-aloha/alex-cognitive-architecture★ 0same name
- nassaj2011/claude-skills-for-chatgpt★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository172 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- 00-meta-initializationSkill
- chwezi-dev-engineSkill
- ai-agent-commercial-operationsSkill
- ai-agent-compliance-controlsSkill
- ai-agent-governance-and-limitsSkill
- ai-agent-multi-agent-coordinationSkill
- ai-agent-observability-evaluationSkill
- ai-agent-runtime-architectureSkill
- ai-agent-safety-and-red-teamSkill
- ai-agent-tooling-and-hitlSkill
- ai-analyticsSkill
- ai-app-architectureSkill
- ai-cost-and-meteringSkill
- ai-economic-value-engineSkill
- ai-evaluationSkill
- ai-feature-rollout-and-experimentationSkill
- ai-feature-specSkill
- ai-incident-responseSkill
- ai-llm-integrationSkill
- ai-model-gatewaySkill
- ai-observability-and-debuggingSkill
- ai-opportunity-canvasSkill
- ai-prompt-engineeringSkill
- ai-rag-patternsSkill
- ai-securitySkill
- ai-web-appsSkill
- coding-agent-optimizationSkill
- openai-agents-sdkSkill
- android-developmentSkill
- api-design-firstSkill
- distributed-systems-patternsSkill
- ecommerce-platform-audit-requirementsSkill
- graphql-patternsSkill
- microservices-architectureSkill
- system-architecture-designSkill
- validation-contractSkill
- database-design-engineeringSkill
- database-reliabilitySkill
- mysql-engineeringSkill
- postgresql-engineeringSkill
- cicd-pipelinesSkill
- cloud-architectureSkill
- deployment-release-engineeringSkill
- docker-developmentSkill
- infrastructure-as-codeSkill
- kubernetes-platformSkill
- reliability-engineeringSkill
- execution-plan-scriptsSkill
- accounting-engineSkill
- accounting-finance-controllerSkill
- electronic-fiscal-taxingSkill
- multicurrency-and-fxSkill
- avalonia-desktop-developmentSkill
- frontend-architectureSkill
- frontend-performanceSkill
- image-compressionSkill
- nextjs-app-routerSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
11
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 17
Use when designing or reviewing logs, metrics, traces, alerts, SLOs, dashboards, audit events, or production telemetry for web apps, APIs, …
- Distinctive: line 35
Start from critical flows and operator questions, define service outcomes and SLOs, map logs, metrics, traces, and audit events, set …
- Distinctive: line 39
Every page has a named owner, user-impact rationale, and first action.
- Very specific: line 76
Use the references/ directory for deep detail after reading the core workflow below.
- Distinctive: line 79
Use this skill when a system must be diagnosable in production.
- Distinctive: line 125
Every request, job, and workflow should have:
- Distinctive: line 138
Prefer structured events with useful dimensions over sparse text strings.
- Distinctive: line 139
Keep personally sensitive or secret fields out, but do not strip away the context needed to debug.
- Distinctive: line 145
Use SLOs for user-facing reliability, not for every internal metric.
- Distinctive: line 166
Do not create vanity dashboards that cannot guide action.
- Distinctive: line 191
Prefer percentiles and rates over averages.
- Distinctive: line 228
Avoid alerts without a runbook path.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Observability Monitoring
Acknowledgement: Shared by Peter Bamuhigire, techguypeter.com, +256 784 464178.
<!-- dual-compat-start -->Use When
- Use when designing or reviewing logs, metrics, traces, alerts, SLOs, dashboards, audit events, or production telemetry for web apps, APIs, SaaS platforms, mobile backends, and AI systems. Covers instrumentation strategy, diagnosis-first telemetry, alert quality, and operational visibility.
Do Not Use When
- The request is business analytics without a production diagnosis, service-level, audit, or operator-response requirement.
- The task only asks to install a monitoring product; first define the operational questions and service outcomes this skill requires.
Required Inputs
| Input | Required | Why it matters |
| Critical user and system flows | yes | Determines what must be observable |
| Service ownership and escalation paths | yes | Connects signals to accountable action |
| Architecture, dependencies, and async boundaries | yes | Defines correlation and trace coverage |
| Data sensitivity, retention, and cost limits | conditional | Constrains event fields, sampling, and storage |
Workflow
Start from critical flows and operator questions, define service outcomes and SLOs, map logs, metrics, traces, and audit events, set correlation and cardinality rules, create actionable alerts and dashboards, then test diagnosis using a known failure.
Quality Standards
Every page has a named owner, user-impact rationale, and first action. Signals carry enough version, environment, tenant, and dependency context to diagnose safely, while secrets and sensitive payloads remain excluded or redacted.
Outputs
| Output | Consumer | Acceptance condition |
| Telemetry map | Developers and operators | Links each critical flow and failure mode to logs, metrics, traces, audit events, and correlation fields |
| SLO and alert catalogue | Service owner and on-call team | Defines measurement, target, window, severity, owner, runbook, and paging action |
| Diagnostic dashboard and verification record | Incident responders | Answers impact, location, change, and next-action questions during an injected or known failure |
Evidence Produced
| Category | Artifact | Format | Example |
| Operability | SLO record | Markdown doc per skill-composition-standards/references/slo-template.md | docs/slo/checkout-service.md |
| Operability | Observability wiring note | Markdown doc listing logs, metrics, traces, and dashboards wired | docs/observability/checkout-wiring.md |
| Operability | Alert catalogue | Markdown doc listing alert name, threshold, and runbook link | docs/observability/checkout-alerts.md |
Capability contract
Inspect telemetry read-only by default. Deploy collectors, change retention, create paging rules, or access sensitive logs only with explicit authority.
Decision rules
| Condition | Action |
| Signal has no operator action | Do not page |
| Label cardinality is unbounded | Remove or aggregate it |
| SLO absent | Define service outcome first |
Domain Anti-Patterns
- Logging secrets. Fix: redact at collection.
- Paging on CPU alone. Fix: alert on user impact.
- Using request IDs as metric labels. Fix: keep them in traces.
- Building ownerless dashboards. Fix: assign a decision and owner.
- Treating missing telemetry as healthy. Fix: alert on collection gaps.
References
- Use the
references/directory for deep detail after reading the core workflow below. - Load
references/observability-platform.mdwhen the task is platform buildout, SigNoz/OpenTelemetry stack design, collector topology, storage, retention, or dashboard infrastructure.
<!-- dual-compat-end -->Use this skill when a system must be diagnosable in production. It covers operational telemetry, not just analytics. The goal is to make failures understandable, actionable, and bounded.
Skill-specific references:
- references/alert-design.md: Alert severity and routing rules.
- references/diagnosis-first-observability.md: Event design, cardinality, release markers, and AI telemetry.
- references/slo-template.md: SLO template and service questions.
Load Order
- Load
world-class-engineering. - Load this skill before finalizing architecture, APIs, jobs, or release design.
- Pair it with
deployment-release-engineeringfor rollout and incident visibility.
Observability Workflow
1. Identify Critical Flows
For each critical flow define:
- trigger
- expected success outcome
- known failure modes
- business impact if degraded
- operator action if it fails
Instrument the highest-impact flows first.
2. Define Telemetry By Question
For every important signal, ask:
- what question will this answer?
- who needs the answer?
- how quickly must they see it?
Use this mapping:
- logs for detailed forensic context
- metrics for trend, rate, saturation, and alerting
- traces for multi-hop latency and dependency diagnosis
- audit events for material business or security actions
- profiles when CPU, memory, lock, or cost behavior matters
3. Design Correlation
Every request, job, and workflow should have:
- request or trace ID
- actor or service identity
- tenant or ownership context where applicable
- environment and version metadata
- release marker or deploy version
- dependency identity for important downstream calls
Without correlation, telemetry becomes noise.
4. Design High-Context Events
- Prefer structured events with useful dimensions over sparse text strings.
- Keep personally sensitive or secret fields out, but do not strip away the context needed to debug.
- Be deliberate about cardinality. High-cardinality dimensions can be valuable when they answer real debugging questions.
- Emit state transitions for long-running jobs and workflows so operators can reconstruct partial failure.
5. Define SLOs And Alerts
Use SLOs for user-facing reliability, not for every internal metric.
Define:
- success metric
- time window
- target threshold
- error budget implications
Alerts should page only when immediate action is required.
6. Build Dashboards For Diagnosis
Dashboards should answer:
- what is broken?
- who is affected?
- where is the bottleneck?
- what changed recently?
- what should the operator do next?
Do not create vanity dashboards that cannot guide action.
Telemetry Standards
Logs
- Use structured logs.
- Include IDs, actor context, tenant context, route or job name, and result.
- Log failures with enough context to debug, but never leak secrets or sensitive payloads.
- Separate business audit logs from application diagnostics.
Metrics
Track:
- request rate
- error rate
- latency percentiles
- resource saturation
- queue depth and lag
- retry and fallback counts
- cache hit rates where relevant
- cost or token usage where relevant
- saturation signals for pools, workers, rate limits, or thread usage
Prefer percentiles and rates over averages.
Traces
Trace:
- requests crossing service or process boundaries
- expensive background workflows
- external dependencies
- AI or retrieval pipelines with multiple stages
- deploy markers and notable async transitions when the platform supports them
Audit Events
Audit events are required for:
- auth and role changes
- financial or ledger-affecting actions
- entitlement changes
- exports, deletions, and approvals
- AI actions with external or privileged side effects
AI And Cost-Aware Telemetry
For AI-enabled systems, capture:
- model, prompt version, and tool path
- retrieval stages and source counts
- token, latency, and cost budgets
- eval outcomes or quality checks where available
- fallback, refusal, and validation failures
Alert Design Rules
- Page on symptoms that require immediate human action.
- Ticket on trends or degradations that can wait.
- Dashboard everything else.
- Avoid alerts without a runbook path.
- Include environment, service, version, impact, and likely first checks.
See references/alert-design.md.
Deliverables
For significant systems, produce:
- telemetry map for critical flows
- SLO definitions
- alert list with severity and owner
- dashboard outline
- audit event list
- trace and correlation ID strategy
- cardinality and sensitive-data guardrails
Review Checklist
- Critical flows have explicit telemetry.
- IDs and tenant context are correlated across logs, metrics, and traces.
- Events contain enough context to debug without unsafe data leakage.
- Alerts map to operator action, not mere curiosity.
- SLOs reflect user impact, not internal implementation trivia.
- Audit events are defined for material actions.
- Sensitive data is excluded or redacted from telemetry.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

