agentleFS
peterbamuhigirepeterbamuhigire/chwezi-dev-engine/skills/ai/ai-agent-tooling-and-hitl/SKILL.md

ai-agent-tooling-and-hitl

Skill31 starsChanged 18 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when designing agent tool catalogs, tool schemas, action gating, human approval, and human-in-the-loop control for agentic AI systems.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Read this SKILL.md first.

    line 35
  2. Distinctive:

    Keep routing explicit: name which reference files were used when the work depends on absorbed material.

    line 42
  3. Distinctive:

    Prefer concrete contracts, checklists, tables, schemas, runbooks, and decision records over broad summaries.

    line 44
  4. Distinctive:

    Default to read-only tool design.

    line 82

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

AI Agent Tooling And HITL

Acknowledgement: Shared by Peter Bamuhigire, techguypeter.com, +256 784 464178.

<!-- dual-compat-start -->

Use When

  • Design tool catalogs, tool contracts, action scopes, and approval gates for agents.
  • Decide when an agent action requires human review, confirmation, or escalation.
  • Integrate agent tools with audit logs, reversibility, tenant policy, and runtime budgets.

Do Not Use When

  • The work is not AI-specific or agentic-AI-specific.
  • A narrower retained AI parent skill fits the request better.

Required Inputs

  • Product, tenant, user, data, risk, and operational context relevant to the AI workflow.
  • Target artifact: design, implementation plan, audit, test strategy, UX flow, commercial policy, or runbook.
  • Constraints from security, privacy, reliability, billing, support, and compliance stakeholders when relevant.

Workflow

  1. Read this SKILL.md first.
  2. Load references/routing.md to select the absorbed child reference that matches the task.
  3. Load only the selected child reference files needed for the current request.
  4. Produce execution-oriented output with assumptions, risks, evidence, and next actions where relevant.

Quality Standards

  • Keep routing explicit: name which reference files were used when the work depends on absorbed material.
  • Preserve tenant isolation, auditability, cost controls, safety gates, and operational evidence when they matter.
  • Prefer concrete contracts, checklists, tables, schemas, runbooks, and decision records over broad summaries.

Anti-Patterns

  • Loading every absorbed reference by default.
  • Treating AI-specific billing, compliance, safety, or UX concerns as generic SaaS work without checking AI failure modes.
  • Hiding retired skill names; old slugs must remain discoverable through references/routing.md.

Outputs

  • A concrete deliverable matched to the request: architecture, implementation plan, audit, policy, runbook, UX flow, test strategy, or operating model.
  • The selected consolidated reference files and any assumptions, risks, evidence requirements, or follow-up actions that affect execution.

References

  • references/routing.md maps retired child skill slugs to their consolidated reference folders.
  • Load references/least-privilege-tool-and-mcp-security.md when making a tool or MCP server safe to call: typed actions, scoped credentials, strict schemas, MCP threats, tool-call audit fields and mandatory tests.
  • Load references/mcp-tool-surface-evaluation.md when proving an MCP server is usable by a model: ten read-only, independent, multi-hop QA pairs on a pinned fixture, frozen answers, excluded mutating tools.

Consolidated Child References

  • Load references/routing.md to map retired AI child skill slugs to their reference modules.

Evidence Produced

CategoryArtifactFormatExample
SecurityTool action and approval matrixMarkdown/YAMLtool, arguments, tenant scope, reversibility, approver, timeout, and denied case
<!-- dual-compat-end -->

Inputs

ArtefactRequired?Purpose
Tool schemas and side-effect classificationyesDefine callable actions
Identity, tenant, approval, and budget policyyesEnforce authority
Reversal and audit requirementsyesBound consequences

Capability contract

Default to read-only tool design. Tool invocation, approval simulation, and side-effect testing require isolated fixtures and explicit execution authority.

Degraded mode

Fallback without executable tools: validate schemas, permission scopes, approval policy, and reversal design statically; mark runtime enforcement unverified.

Decision rules

Action classGateFailure avoided
Read-only, low sensitivityPolicy-scoped automatic callApproval fatigue
Reversible mutationConfirm policy and log resultSilent unwanted change
Irreversible, financial, external, or privilegedJust-in-time human approvalUnauthorised impact

Domain anti-patterns

  • Giving one tool broad multi-action scope. Fix: expose narrow, typed actions.
  • Trusting prompt text for authorisation. Fix: enforce identity and policy outside the model.
  • Asking approval after execution. Fix: gate before side effects.
  • Omitting idempotency and reversal. Fix: define both for every mutation.
  • Logging arguments without protecting secrets. Fix: redact and classify audit fields.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.