rh-ssg-technical-examples
Skill4 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Review Red Hat documentation for SSG technical example compliance — root privilege commands, YAML ellipses, IP addresses (RFC 5737 for IPv4, RFC 3849 for IPv6), MAC addresses (RFC 7042), code block quality (accurate, copy-paste friendly), and syntax highlighting. Use this skill when checking Red Hat docs for code examples, IP/MAC addresses in examples, sudo usage, YAML formatting, or source language tags on code blocks. Takes precedence over ibm-sg-technical-elements for Red Hat content.
In this repository53 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- action-commentsSkill
- article-extractorSkill
- docs-convert-gdoc-mdSkill
- docs-orchestratorSkill
- docs-review-content-qualitySkill
- docs-review-modular-docsSkill
- docs-review-securitySkill
- docs-review-styleSkill
- docs-review-technicalSkill
- docs-ticket-readinessSkill
- docs-workflow-code-analysisSkill
- docs-workflow-create-jiraSkill
- docs-workflow-create-merge-requestSkill
- docs-workflow-jira-readySkill
- docs-workflow-pipeline-diagnosticsSkill
- docs-workflow-planningSkill
- docs-workflow-pr-analysisSkill
- docs-workflow-quality-gateSkill
- docs-workflow-requirementsSkill
- docs-workflow-scope-req-auditSkill
- docs-workflow-security-reviewSkill
- docs-workflow-startSkill
- docs-workflow-style-reviewSkill
- docs-workflow-tech-reviewSkill
- docs-workflow-writingSkill
- git-pr-readerSkill
- ibm-sg-audience-and-mediumSkill
- ibm-sg-language-and-grammarSkill
- ibm-sg-legal-informationSkill
- ibm-sg-numbers-and-measurementSkill
- ibm-sg-punctuationSkill
- ibm-sg-referencesSkill
- ibm-sg-structure-and-formatSkill
- ibm-sg-technical-elementsSkill
- jira-readerSkill
- jira-writerSkill
- learn-codeSkill
- lint-with-valeSkill
- mdita-writeSkill
- query-codeSkill
- redhat-docs-tocSkill
- rh-ssg-accessibilitySkill
- rh-ssg-formattingSkill
- rh-ssg-grammar-and-languageSkill
- rh-ssg-gui-and-linksSkill
- rh-ssg-legal-and-supportSkill
- rh-ssg-release-notesSkill
- rh-ssg-structureSkill
- rn-known-issuesSkill
- understand-pull-requestSkill
- validate-plugin-prereqsSkill
The file
Files
Red Hat SSG: Technical Examples review skill
Review documentation for technical example compliance with the Red Hat Supplementary Style Guide.
Checklist
Commands requiring root privileges
- Commands requiring root privileges use
sudoprefix, notsu - - Commands with
sudouse the$prompt, not# - Shell prompts alone are not the only indicator of required privilege level — step text, intro, or prerequisites also state the requirement
- If multiple commands require root, introductory text mentions it: "Some tasks in this procedure require root privileges..."
Ellipses in YAML code blocks
- Ellipses in YAML use
# ...(commented out), not bare... - Bare
...in YAML is reserved for "end of document" per YAML spec
IP addresses and MAC addresses
- Example IPv4 addresses use RFC 5737 reserved ranges:
192.0.2.0/24198.51.100.0/24203.0.113.0/24
- Example IPv6 addresses use RFC 3849 reserved range:
2001:0DB8::/32 - Example MAC addresses use RFC 7042 reserved ranges:
- Unicast:
00:00:5E:00:53:00–00:00:5E:00:53:FF - Multicast:
01:00:5E:90:10:00–01:00:5E:90:10:FF
- Unicast:
- No real IP or MAC addresses are used in examples
Long code examples
- All code blocks are necessary, accurate, and helpful
- Code blocks are copy-and-paste friendly (except for user-replaced values)
Syntax highlighting
- Source language is provided when supported:
[source,yaml],[source,xml], etc. bashis NOT used for terminal commands — it misinterprets#as a comment instead of a root prompt- Use
terminalorconsoleor omit the source language for shell commands
How to use
- Review only changed content and necessary context
- For each issue found, cite the relevant SSG section
- Mark issues as required (real IP addresses,
bashsource language for shell commands) or [SUGGESTION] (improvements)
Example invocations
- "Review technical examples in this procedure module"
- "Check IP addresses and code blocks in proc_configuring-network.adoc"
- "Do an SSG technical examples review on the changed files"
References
For detailed guidance, consult:
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

