rh-ssg-structure
Skill4 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Review Red Hat documentation for SSG structural compliance — admonitions (NOTE/IMPORTANT/WARNING/TIP only, no CAUTION, no clustering, modules never start with admonitions), lead-in sentences (only when needed after Prerequisites/Procedure headings), prerequisites (written as completed states not imperative commands), and short descriptions/abstracts (2-3 sentences, customer-centric, no self-referential language). Use this skill when checking Red Hat docs for admonition usage, prerequisite formatting, short descriptions, or structural compliance. Takes precedence over ibm-sg-structure-and-format for Red Hat content.
In this repository53 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- action-commentsSkill
- article-extractorSkill
- docs-convert-gdoc-mdSkill
- docs-orchestratorSkill
- docs-review-content-qualitySkill
- docs-review-modular-docsSkill
- docs-review-securitySkill
- docs-review-styleSkill
- docs-review-technicalSkill
- docs-ticket-readinessSkill
- docs-workflow-code-analysisSkill
- docs-workflow-create-jiraSkill
- docs-workflow-create-merge-requestSkill
- docs-workflow-jira-readySkill
- docs-workflow-pipeline-diagnosticsSkill
- docs-workflow-planningSkill
- docs-workflow-pr-analysisSkill
- docs-workflow-quality-gateSkill
- docs-workflow-requirementsSkill
- docs-workflow-scope-req-auditSkill
- docs-workflow-security-reviewSkill
- docs-workflow-startSkill
- docs-workflow-style-reviewSkill
- docs-workflow-tech-reviewSkill
- docs-workflow-writingSkill
- git-pr-readerSkill
- ibm-sg-audience-and-mediumSkill
- ibm-sg-language-and-grammarSkill
- ibm-sg-legal-informationSkill
- ibm-sg-numbers-and-measurementSkill
- ibm-sg-punctuationSkill
- ibm-sg-referencesSkill
- ibm-sg-structure-and-formatSkill
- ibm-sg-technical-elementsSkill
- jira-readerSkill
- jira-writerSkill
- learn-codeSkill
- lint-with-valeSkill
- mdita-writeSkill
- query-codeSkill
- redhat-docs-tocSkill
- rh-ssg-accessibilitySkill
- rh-ssg-formattingSkill
- rh-ssg-grammar-and-languageSkill
- rh-ssg-gui-and-linksSkill
- rh-ssg-legal-and-supportSkill
- rh-ssg-release-notesSkill
- rh-ssg-technical-examplesSkill
- rn-known-issuesSkill
- understand-pull-requestSkill
- validate-plugin-prereqsSkill
The file
Files
Red Hat SSG: Structure review skill
Review documentation for structural compliance with the Red Hat Supplementary Style Guide.
Checklist
Admonitions
- Admonitions are kept to a minimum; no multiple admonitions clustered together
- Only valid types are used: NOTE, IMPORTANT, WARNING, TIP
- CAUTION admonition is not used (not supported by Red Hat Customer Portal)
- Admonitions are short and concise — no procedures inside admonitions
- Only singular admonition headings ("NOTE" not "NOTES")
- Modules do not start with an admonition — a short description must come first
Lead-in sentences
- No unnecessary lead-in sentences after "Prerequisites" or "Procedure" headings
- Lead-in sentences are used only when needed for navigation or clarity (e.g., grouping long prerequisite lists, emphasizing all steps must be completed)
- Lead-in sentences are complete sentences (not fragments)
Prerequisites
- Prerequisites are written as checks or completed states, not imperative commands
- Passive voice is acceptable when the agent is unknown or unimportant: "JDK 11 or later is installed"
- Imperative formations are avoided: not "Install JDK 11" but "JDK 11 or later is installed"
- Parallel language is used across all prerequisite bullets
Short descriptions
- Every module and assembly has a short description (abstract) before the main content
- Short descriptions are 2–3 sentences
- Short descriptions include what users must do and why they must do it
- Product name appears in either the title or short description
- No self-referential language: not "This topic covers..." or "Use this procedure to..."
- No feature-focused language: not "This product allows you to..."
- Customer-centric language is used: "You can... by..." or "To..., configure..."
- Active voice and present tense are used
How to use
- Review only changed content and necessary context
- For each issue found, cite the relevant SSG section
- Mark issues as required (missing short description, CAUTION admonition used, imperative prerequisites) or [SUGGESTION] (improvements)
Example invocations
- "Review structure in this procedure module"
- "Check admonitions and prerequisites in proc_configuring-auth.adoc"
- "Do an SSG structure review on the changed modules"
References
For detailed guidance, consult:
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

