ibm-sg-structure-and-format
Skill4 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Review documentation for IBM Style Guide structure and format — headings (sentence case, no gerunds), lists (parallel structure, lead-in sentences), procedures (imperative verbs, one action per step, max 9 steps), tables (headers, alignment, captions), notes/warnings/tips, bold/monospace/italic formatting, and figures with alt text. Use this skill when checking doc structure, heading style, list formatting, procedure steps, table layout, or emphasis conventions. For Red Hat docs, the rh-ssg-structure and rh-ssg-formatting skills take precedence.
In this repository53 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- action-commentsSkill
- article-extractorSkill
- docs-convert-gdoc-mdSkill
- docs-orchestratorSkill
- docs-review-content-qualitySkill
- docs-review-modular-docsSkill
- docs-review-securitySkill
- docs-review-styleSkill
- docs-review-technicalSkill
- docs-ticket-readinessSkill
- docs-workflow-code-analysisSkill
- docs-workflow-create-jiraSkill
- docs-workflow-create-merge-requestSkill
- docs-workflow-jira-readySkill
- docs-workflow-pipeline-diagnosticsSkill
- docs-workflow-planningSkill
- docs-workflow-pr-analysisSkill
- docs-workflow-quality-gateSkill
- docs-workflow-requirementsSkill
- docs-workflow-scope-req-auditSkill
- docs-workflow-security-reviewSkill
- docs-workflow-startSkill
- docs-workflow-style-reviewSkill
- docs-workflow-tech-reviewSkill
- docs-workflow-writingSkill
- git-pr-readerSkill
- ibm-sg-audience-and-mediumSkill
- ibm-sg-language-and-grammarSkill
- ibm-sg-legal-informationSkill
- ibm-sg-numbers-and-measurementSkill
- ibm-sg-punctuationSkill
- ibm-sg-referencesSkill
- ibm-sg-technical-elementsSkill
- jira-readerSkill
- jira-writerSkill
- learn-codeSkill
- lint-with-valeSkill
- mdita-writeSkill
- query-codeSkill
- redhat-docs-tocSkill
- rh-ssg-accessibilitySkill
- rh-ssg-formattingSkill
- rh-ssg-grammar-and-languageSkill
- rh-ssg-gui-and-linksSkill
- rh-ssg-legal-and-supportSkill
- rh-ssg-release-notesSkill
- rh-ssg-structureSkill
- rh-ssg-technical-examplesSkill
- rn-known-issuesSkill
- understand-pull-requestSkill
- validate-plugin-prereqsSkill
The file
Files
IBM Style Guide: Structure and Format review skill
Review documentation for structure and format issues: headings, lists, procedures, paragraphs, tables, notes, emphasis, figures, and examples.
Precedence: For Red Hat documentation, the Red Hat Supplementary Style Guide (SSG) takes precedence over IBM Style Guide rules. Where guidance conflicts, follow the RH SSG skill for that topic (e.g., rh-ssg-formatting, rh-ssg-structure).
Checklist
Headings
- Sentence case is used: "Configure the database connection" (not Title Case)
- Heading levels are not skipped: H1 > H2 > H3
- Headings are concise (under 8 words ideally)
- Headings are descriptive and specific: "Install the CLI on Linux" not "Installation"
- Task headings start with a verb: "Create," "Configure," "Deploy"
- Gerunds (-ing) are not used in task headings: "Create a cluster" not "Creating a cluster"
- Headings do not end with periods or colons
- Code formatting in headings is avoided unless necessary
Lists
- Ordered lists are used for sequential steps; unordered lists for non-sequential items
- Parallel structure is used: all items start the same way (all verbs, all nouns)
- First word of each list item is capitalized
- Punctuation is consistent: all periods or no periods within a list
- Lists have more than one item
- Nesting does not exceed two levels
- Lists are introduced with a complete lead-in sentence ending in a colon
- "Following" is not used without a noun: "the following items:" not "the following:"
Procedures
- Numbered lists are used for sequential steps
- Each step starts with an imperative verb: "Click," "Enter," "Select"
- One action per step; multiple actions are not combined
- Expected results or output are stated after the action when helpful
- Procedures do not exceed 9 steps; longer procedures are broken into sub-tasks
- Prerequisites are listed before the procedure, not within it
- Optional steps begin with "Optional:"
Paragraphs
- Main point leads the paragraph
- Paragraphs are short: 3-5 sentences maximum
- One idea per paragraph
Tables
- Tables are used for data, not layout
- Header rows with clear column labels are present
- Text is left-aligned; numbers are right-aligned
- Cell content is brief
- Every table has a caption or introductory sentence
- Empty cells use "N/A," "None," or a dash
- Rows are sorted logically
Notes, tips, and warnings
- "Note:" is used for supplementary, non-critical information
- "Important:" is used for must-not-miss information
- "Warning:" is used for data loss or system damage risks
- Admonitions are not overused
- Warnings are placed before the action, not after
Highlighting and emphasis
- Bold is used for UI elements: Save, File > New
Monospaceis used for code, commands, file names, and paths- Italic is used for introducing new terms on first use only
- Underline is not used for emphasis
- ALL CAPS is not used for emphasis
- Multiple emphasis styles are not combined (bold italic, bold underline)
Figures and images
- Every image has a figure number and descriptive caption
- Figures are referenced in text before they appear
- Alt text is provided for every image
- Images are not the sole means of conveying critical information
Examples
- Examples use realistic values, not "foo," "bar," or "Lorem ipsum"
- Example domains use RFC 2606: example.com, example.org
- Example IPs use RFC 5737: 192.0.2.x, 198.51.100.x, 203.0.113.x
- Examples use clearly fake names and data, never real personal information
How to use
- Review only changed content and necessary context
- For each issue found, cite the relevant IBM Style Guide section
- Mark issues as required (broken structure, missing headings) or [SUGGESTION] (formatting improvements)
Example invocations
- "Review this file for structure and format issues"
- "Check headings and lists in this procedure module"
- "Do an IBM structure review on the assembly"
References
For detailed guidance, consult:
- IBM Style Guide: Structure and format sections
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

