test-coverage
Skill6 starsChanged 48 days agoMITView on GitHub
A focused test pass over a change before it lands. Use on tickets that add or modify behavior — new endpoints, business logic, bug fixes, or refactors. Confirms the change is actually covered by tests, flags gaps with a file:line and the missing case, and blocks landing on untested critical paths.
20 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- luongnv89/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- cognitedata/builder-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- drvoss/everything-copilot-clitheir own version, first seen Oct 26, 2026
- vhmarquez/argotheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- manastalukdar/ai-devstudiotheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- wso2/product-apimtheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use instinct-export, instinct-import and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
TheKREATORSSkillinstinct-export
Export instincts from project/global scope to a file
Also in 3 projects that use this
TheKREATORSSkillinstinct-import
Import instincts from file or URL into project/global scope
Also in 3 projects that use this
diego-tobalinaSkillbuild-fix
Fix build and compilation errors systematically. Run when build fails.
Also in 3 projects that use this
qtzx06Skilleval
Evaluate trained YOLO model accuracy with mAP metrics and per-class error analysis. Identifies failure cases for targeted improvement. Use after training.
Also in 4 projects that use this
HABUBUSSSkilleval-harness
Also in 5 projects that use this
Microsoft AzureSkilliterative-retrieval
Max-3-cycle protocol for agent sub-tasks with WHY context and coordinator validation. Use when spawning sub-agents to complete scoped work.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +1 more from TheKREATORS
Other versions20 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 20
- cloudposse/atmos★ 1.4ksame name
- wso2/product-apim★ 1ksame name
- LedgerHQ/ledger-live★ 627same name
- luongnv89/skills★ 145same name
- drvoss/everything-copilot-cli★ 48same name
- ariadoss/superskills★ 12same name
- Montimage/skills★ 9same name
- cognitedata/builder-skills★ 6same name
- kartik-nighania/av_claude_code_workshop★ 4same name
- PatriotAgenticLLC/better_claude_skillz★ 3same name
10 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository24 other files it gives its agents.
- docs/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- atomic-reportSkill
- board-validateSkill
- data-modelSkill
- delivery-hygieneSkill
- dev-reportSkill
- dev-setupSkill
- frontend-qualitySkill
- gcSkill
- git-branchSkill
- land-and-archiveSkill
- orchestration-healthSkill
- orchestratorSkill
- pipeline-qualitySkill
- plan-updateSkill
- project-planSkill
- release-gateSkill
- repo-auditSkill
- scaleSkill
- security-reviewSkill
- swarmSkill
- tpmSkill
- trackerSkill
- worktree-cleanupSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 19 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Run this on changes that alter behavior: new features, bug fixes, refactors of logic, or anything touching a critical path.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 19 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Test Coverage
Run this on changes that alter behavior: new features, bug fixes, refactors of logic, or anything touching a critical path. Skip it only for pure docs, comments, or formatting.
Look for
- Untested new logic — new functions, branches, or endpoints with no test exercising them. Each new decision point (if/switch/guard) needs at least one test.
- Bug fix without a regression test — a fix that doesn't add a test reproducing the original bug will silently regress. The test must fail on the old code and pass on the new.
- Happy-path only — tests that cover success but not the error, empty, boundary, and null/invalid-input cases the code clearly handles.
- Assertion-free tests — tests that run code but assert nothing, or assert only that "no error was thrown." These give false confidence.
- Coverage theater — lines executed by a test but whose behavior is never asserted; high line-coverage numbers hiding untested logic.
- Flaky or order-dependent tests — reliance on real time, network, randomness, or shared mutable state instead of controlled fakes.
- Broken or skipped tests —
.skip,xit, commented-out tests, or a failing suite shipped as-is.
Report
For each gap: the file:line of the untested code, the specific case that's missing
(e.g. "no test for empty cart → expected 400"), and a concrete test to add — ideally the
arrange/act/assert outline. Confirm the suite runs green with the project's test command (see
context.md) and name the command you ran. Skip demands for tests on trivial or generated
code with no logic.
This pass gates the merge the same way QA and the release gate do: new or changed critical-path logic without a passing test that covers it blocks landing.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

