pipeline-quality
Skill6 starsChanged 50 days agoMITView on GitHub
Validate data-pipeline changes against quality contracts: run the pipeline test suite, verify stage idempotency, check extraction fixtures against expected output, confirm schema fixture coverage, and gate migration safety. Use before merging any pipeline change.
In this repository24 other files it gives its agents.
- docs/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- atomic-reportSkill
- board-validateSkill
- data-modelSkill
- delivery-hygieneSkill
- dev-reportSkill
- dev-setupSkill
- frontend-qualitySkill
- gcSkill
- git-branchSkill
- land-and-archiveSkill
- orchestration-healthSkill
- orchestratorSkill
- plan-updateSkill
- project-planSkill
- release-gateSkill
- repo-auditSkill
- scaleSkill
- security-reviewSkill
- swarmSkill
- test-coverageSkill
- tpmSkill
- trackerSkill
- worktree-cleanupSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 17
Run the pipeline area's test command from context.md (the same command the release gate uses) from the project root.
- Distinctive: line 28
Run the stage twice on the same input.
- Distinctive: line 36
Run the extractor against the fixture.
- Distinctive: line 49
If the change includes a database migration:
- Distinctive: line 53
Run the migration on a throwaway DB: assert upgrade succeeds, run downgrade, assert state is restored.
- Very specific: line 58
Read the project's context.md for pipeline-specific quality rules — QA/confidence thresholds, fixture conventions, entity-specific …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Pipeline Quality
Validates a data pipeline against quality contracts: correctness, idempotency, fixture
coverage, and extraction fidelity. Domain-specific rules (confidence thresholds, fixture
conventions, per-entity checks) belong in the project's context.md — this skill carries the
contract every pipeline shares.
Common contract
1. Test suite
Run the pipeline area's test command from context.md (the same command the release gate
uses) from the project root.
- Must exit 0.
- Report any failures with test name and failure message.
- Coverage must meet the threshold the project declares in
context.md, if any.
2. Idempotency
For every pipeline stage the change touches:
- Run the stage twice on the same input.
- Assert the second run writes nothing — no new DB records, no file changes, no errors.
- A stage that is not idempotent is a blocking defect.
3. Fixture regression
For every extraction fixture in the test suite:
- Run the extractor against the fixture.
- Assert the output matches the expected fixture output exactly.
- A changed fixture output that was not explicitly updated is a blocking defect.
4. Schema completeness
For every field in the extraction schema:
- A test fixture must exercise that field with a valid, a null/missing, and an invalid value.
- Fields without fixture coverage are flagged as warnings.
5. Migration safety
If the change includes a database migration:
- The downgrade path must be implemented.
- A
NOT NULLcolumn on a non-empty table requires a server default. - Run the migration on a throwaway DB: assert upgrade succeeds, run downgrade, assert state is restored.
Domain rules
Read the project's context.md for pipeline-specific quality rules — QA/confidence
thresholds, fixture conventions, entity-specific invariants — and apply them alongside the
common contract. A project that only needs to add rules should append them in
custom/skills/pipeline-quality/OVERLAY.md, which keeps this skill updating underneath; a
project that needs a fundamentally different contract can replace it outright with
custom/skills/pipeline-quality/SKILL.md.
Output
=== Pipeline Quality ===
Test suite: PASS / FAIL (<n> tests, <m> failures)
Idempotency: PASS / FAIL (<stages checked>)
Fixture parity: PASS / FAIL (<n> fixtures, <m> mismatches)
Schema coverage: PASS / WARN (<n> fields, <m> without coverage)
Migration: PASS / FAIL / SKIP
BLOCKERS:
- <description>
WARNINGS:
- <description>
VERDICT: SHIP / BLOCKA BLOCK sends the ticket back to build with the specific failure — same contract as the
release-gate skill.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

