delivery-hygiene
Skill6 starsChanged 50 days agoMITView on GitHub
Keep the board small, clear, and close to the real delivery shape. Use when breaking work into tickets, deciding whether to split blockers/verification/docs, or cleaning up an oversized board without losing delivery clarity.
In this repository24 other files it gives its agents.
- docs/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- atomic-reportSkill
- board-validateSkill
- data-modelSkill
- dev-reportSkill
- dev-setupSkill
- frontend-qualitySkill
- gcSkill
- git-branchSkill
- land-and-archiveSkill
- orchestration-healthSkill
- orchestratorSkill
- pipeline-qualitySkill
- plan-updateSkill
- project-planSkill
- release-gateSkill
- repo-auditSkill
- scaleSkill
- security-reviewSkill
- swarmSkill
- test-coverageSkill
- tpmSkill
- trackerSkill
- worktree-cleanupSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 13
One ticket per independently shippable outcome: If two things always ship together, they're one ticket.
- Distinctive: line 17
Blocker tickets only: when they unlock *multiple* downstream tickets or need a separate owner.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Delivery Hygiene
Boards rot when every thought becomes a ticket. Use this when planning work or when a board feels noisy.
Core rules
- One ticket per independently shippable outcome. If two things always ship together, they're one ticket.
- Split only when ownership, release boundary, or test surface genuinely differs — not because a ticket "feels big."
- Blocker tickets only when they unlock multiple downstream tickets or need a separate owner. A prerequisite that only one ticket needs is just a first step of that ticket.
- Verification stays in the parent's acceptance criteria unless it's a standalone release gate.
- Docs and cleanup ride with the parent unless the artifact itself is the deliverable.
- Migrations/refactors get an explicit fan-out budget up front: prefer one plan ticket, one implementation ticket, one verification ticket, one cleanup ticket — not one per file.
- Every ticket has acceptance criteria before implementation starts. A ticket that can't state verifiable ACs isn't ready to be a ticket.
Reviewing an oversized board
- Merge tickets that always move together.
- Collapse "write the test" / "write the doc" tickets back into their parent's ACs.
- Turn a chain of tiny sequential tickets into one ticket with steps.
- Move release/prod work into its own gated epic so it stops cluttering dev flow.
The board records what's built, blocked, or done — it is not a place to track evidence,
notes, or reminders. Those live in the ticket desc or {{BOARD}}/specs/<id>.md.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

