dev-report
Skill6 starsChanged 47 days agoMITView on GitHub
Read-only status snapshot of the work: every repo and worktree's branches, ahead/behind, and uncommitted changes, correlated against the board so each ticket reads as landed, in flight, stale, or unstarted. Use to answer \"where are we?\" — before starting a run, after a batch of tickets, or when the board and the git history disagree.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- delpicorp/dev-reporttheir own version, first seen Aug 3, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- delpicorp/dev-report★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository24 other files it gives its agents.
- docs/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- atomic-reportSkill
- board-validateSkill
- data-modelSkill
- delivery-hygieneSkill
- dev-setupSkill
- frontend-qualitySkill
- gcSkill
- git-branchSkill
- land-and-archiveSkill
- orchestration-healthSkill
- orchestratorSkill
- pipeline-qualitySkill
- plan-updateSkill
- project-planSkill
- release-gateSkill
- repo-auditSkill
- scaleSkill
- security-reviewSkill
- swarmSkill
- test-coverageSkill
- tpmSkill
- trackerSkill
- worktree-cleanupSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 21
Don't re-derive their checks here — point at them.
- Very specific: line 37
Every worktree under ../.maestro-wt/* (git worktree list).
- Very specific: line 46
Never assume a path is a repo — verify with git -C <path> rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree and skip cleanly if it isn't.
- Very specific: line 67
Read {{BOARD}}/data.json (active) and {{BOARD}}/archive.json (landed).
- Distinctive: line 70
Place each ticket in exactly one bucket, and prefer git over the board when they disagree:
- Distinctive: line 84
If the board files are missing or unparseable, say so and produce the git-only report — the per-repo half still stands on its own.
- Distinctive: line 116
Read-only, always: No edits, commits, branch switches, pushes, or board writes.
- Distinctive: line 120
No dumps: Commit subjects and changed-file counts, not logs and diffs.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Dev Report
Answers one question: what is the actual state of the work right now? It reads git and the
board, correlates them, and reports. It changes nothing — the only state-touching command it
may run is git fetch.
This is the status skill. It is not the others:
| Question | Skill |
| Where are we? | this one |
| Is the orchestration state broken? | orchestration-health |
| Is my checkout stale? | gc |
| Can I delete this worktree/branch? | worktree-cleanup |
Don't re-derive their checks here — point at them. A report that quietly disagrees with
orchestration-health is worse than no report.
Before you report
Fetch first. A checkout a few commits behind will confidently call already-merged work
"unmerged" and archived tickets "in flight" — the whole report inverts. Run the gc skill's
fetch step, or at minimum git fetch --all --prune per repo, before judging anything. If a
fetch fails (no remote, offline), say so in the report and mark that repo's ahead/behind
unknown — never guess a count.
1. Find the repos
The default scope is the project repo plus its ticket worktrees:
- The repo containing the board.
- Every worktree under
../.maestro-wt/*(git worktree list).
For a workspace of sibling repos, read the project's config.json (next to the board, at
{{BOARD}}/../config.json): if it has a repos array of paths, sweep those too.
"repos": ["../service-api", "../web-app"]Never assume a path is a repo — verify with git -C <path> rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree
and skip cleanly if it isn't. Report an expected repo that's missing rather than dropping it
silently.
2. Gather per repo (read-only)
- Current branch and HEAD sha —
git -C <p> branch --show-current; flag a detached HEAD. - Worktrees —
git -C <p> worktree list. - Working tree —
git -C <p> status --porcelain=v1 -b(staged / unstaged / untracked counts, upstream tracking line). Counts only; never paste diffs. - Ahead/behind vs the default branch. Resolve it, don't hardcode
main:default_branch=$(git -C <p> symbolic-ref --short refs/remotes/origin/HEAD | sed 's@^origin/@@') git -C <p> rev-list --left-right --count "origin/$default_branch...<branch>" - Recent commits —
git -C <p> log --oneline -10on the current branch. - Merged and stale branches —
git -C <p> branch --merged "origin/$default_branch", plus each branch's last-commit date.
3. Correlate with the board
Read {{BOARD}}/data.json (active) and {{BOARD}}/archive.json (landed). Ticket ids show up
in branch names and commit subjects — that's the join key. Match on the id, not on prose.
Place each ticket in exactly one bucket, and prefer git over the board when they disagree:
| Bucket | Evidence |
| Landed | in archive.json, or its commits are merged into the default branch |
| In flight | unmerged branch or live worktree with commits |
| In progress | uncommitted changes in a worktree |
| Claimed but empty | in-progress on the board with no branch and no worktree |
| Unstarted | on the board, no git trace |
The last bucket is the one worth surfacing loudly — it's a claim nothing is behind, and it
blocks the ticket from ever being picked up again. Report it and hand the diagnosis to
orchestration-health; don't fix it here.
If the board files are missing or unparseable, say so and produce the git-only report — the per-repo half still stands on its own.
Output
Terse markdown, scanned rather than read. Lead with the two sections that get acted on.
# Dev Report
## TL;DR
- 2–5 bullets: what's moving, what just landed, what needs a decision.
## Needs attention
- Claimed but empty: <ticket> (in-progress, no branch/worktree) → run orchestration-health
- Merged branches safe to delete: <branch> (repo) → worktree-cleanup
- Dirty trees, detached HEADs, branches behind the default, missing repos, fetch failures
## Per repo
### <repo> (branch: <b> @ <sha>, clean | N changed)
- vs origin/<default>: ahead X / behind Y
- Worktrees: <ticket-id> → <branch> (N commits, last <date>)
- Unmerged branches: <branch> → <ticket> <bucket>
- Recent: <3 commit subjects>
## Board
- Landed: <ids> In flight: <id → branch> In progress: <id → repo>
- Blocked / gated: <id> — <blocker or gate>Rules
- Read-only, always. No edits, commits, branch switches, pushes, or board writes. State fixes as recommendations naming the skill that performs them — never run them.
- Accurate over complete. A failed command means unknown, printed as unknown. A confidently wrong status report is worse than a short one.
- No dumps. Commit subjects and changed-file counts, not logs and diffs.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

