change-impact-analysis
Skill1 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when the main question is what a proposed or partial change will affect across code, interfaces, configs, tests, docs, consumers, and rollout surfaces. This skill maps blast radius before implementation, merge, or release.
6 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- wannanbigpig/ai-engineering-collaborationtheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- dss-time/repo-doctor-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- fzfclee/consulting-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- sarveshtalele/change-impact-analysis-skilltheir own version, first seen Jul 16, 2026
- sarveshtalele/mcp-skills-registrytheir own version, first seen Jun 12, 2026
- jdm4pku/RE-Skillstheir own version, first seen Apr 5, 2026
Other versions6 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 6
- jdm4pku/RE-Skills★ 26same name
- fzfclee/consulting-skills★ 6same name
- sarveshtalele/mcp-skills-registry★ 2same name
- wannanbigpig/ai-engineering-collaboration★ 2same name
- dss-time/repo-doctor-skills★ 1same name
- sarveshtalele/change-impact-analysis-skill★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository21 other files it gives its agents.
- api-contract-compatibility-reviewSkill
- architecture-refactor-guidanceSkill
- browser-verificationSkill
- cost-impact-reviewSkill
- data-migration-safety-reviewSkill
- data-quality-auditSkill
- dependency-compliance-auditSkill
- docs-writerSkill
- environment-config-auditSkill
- fix-ciSkill
- incident-observability-triageSkill
- performance-investigationSkill
- planningSkill
- release-incident-postmortemSkill
- release-rollout-strategySkill
- review-address-commentsSkill
- security-reviewSkill
- ship-readinessSkill
- dev-workflow-kitSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- test-strategy-gap-reviewSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 9
Use this skill when the key uncertainty is breadth of impact rather than how to write the code.
- Distinctive: line 13
Use this skill when:
- Distinctive: line 20
Do not use this skill for root-cause debugging or for deciding the internal structure of a refactor.
- Very specific: line 44
use planning if scope needs to be re-sliced
- Very specific: line 46
use ship-readiness or release-rollout-strategy when impact affects release shape
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Change Impact Analysis
Use this skill when the key uncertainty is breadth of impact rather than how to write the code.
Trigger Conditions
Use this skill when:
- a change may affect multiple modules, consumers, or environments
- the team needs to know what else must be updated before implementation
- API, schema, config, docs, tests, or rollout surfaces may be touched indirectly
- the user asks what could break if a change goes in
- release risk depends on understanding downstream effects first
Do not use this skill for root-cause debugging or for deciding the internal structure of a refactor.
Workflow
- Identify the proposed or in-progress change.
- Map directly touched files, modules, contracts, configs, and consumers.
- Identify likely indirect effects and regression zones.
- Separate must-check surfaces from lower-risk surfaces.
- Recommend verification focus and rollout cautions.
- Hand off to the next workflow step.
Output
For non-trivial work, provide:
- impacted surfaces
- direct vs indirect consequences
- likely regression zones
- verification focus areas
- rollout or migration cautions
- recommended next action
Coordination
After impact analysis:
- use
planningif scope needs to be re-sliced - move into the active implementation workflow for execution
- use
ship-readinessorrelease-rollout-strategywhen impact affects release shape
Invocation Examples
- "Use change-impact-analysis to show what else this schema change could affect."
- "Use change-impact-analysis before implementation so we know which tests, docs, and clients are in scope."
- "Use change-impact-analysis to identify the likely regression zones for this config change."
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

