release-incident-postmortem
Skill1 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when an incident has already been mitigated and the team needs a structured post-incident retrospective with timeline, impact, root cause, contributing factors, and follow-up actions.
In this repository21 other files it gives its agents.
- api-contract-compatibility-reviewSkill
- architecture-refactor-guidanceSkill
- browser-verificationSkill
- change-impact-analysisSkill
- cost-impact-reviewSkill
- data-migration-safety-reviewSkill
- data-quality-auditSkill
- dependency-compliance-auditSkill
- docs-writerSkill
- environment-config-auditSkill
- fix-ciSkill
- incident-observability-triageSkill
- performance-investigationSkill
- planningSkill
- release-rollout-strategySkill
- review-address-commentsSkill
- security-reviewSkill
- ship-readinessSkill
- dev-workflow-kitSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- test-strategy-gap-reviewSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 9
Use this skill when the incident is over and the focus is structured learning, not live triage.
- Distinctive: line 13
Use this skill when:
- Distinctive: line 16
follow-up actions, owners, and prevention work need to be captured
- Distinctive: line 19
Do not use this skill while an incident is still active or when root cause is still unknown.
- Distinctive: line 37
follow-up actions with owners
- Very specific: line 43
use docs-writer to publish the postmortem and any external comms
- Very specific: line 44
use release-rollout-strategy if rollout shape needs to change for prevention
- Very specific: line 45
use systematic-debugging only if root cause turns out to still be unclear
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Release Incident Postmortem
Use this skill when the incident is over and the focus is structured learning, not live triage.
Trigger Conditions
Use this skill when:
- an outage, regression, or release incident has already been mitigated
- the team needs a postmortem document with timeline and root-cause analysis
- follow-up actions, owners, and prevention work need to be captured
- a release-related incident requires a learning record beyond a chat summary
Do not use this skill while an incident is still active or when root cause is still unknown.
Workflow
- Confirm the incident is mitigated and stable.
- Reconstruct the timeline using available evidence.
- Summarize user-visible impact and scope.
- Identify root cause and contributing factors.
- Capture mitigation steps actually taken.
- Define concrete follow-up actions, owners, and verification.
Output
For non-trivial work, provide:
- timeline summary
- impact and scope
- root cause and contributing factors
- mitigation actions taken
- follow-up actions with owners
- recommended preventive changes
Coordination
After postmortem drafting:
- use
docs-writerto publish the postmortem and any external comms - use
release-rollout-strategyif rollout shape needs to change for prevention - use
systematic-debuggingonly if root cause turns out to still be unclear
Invocation Examples
- "Use release-incident-postmortem from dev-workflow-kit to run a structured postmortem on this outage."
- "Use release-incident-postmortem to capture timeline, impact, and follow-up actions for last night's incident."
- "Use release-incident-postmortem to write the retrospective doc now that mitigation is complete."
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

