agentleFS
motao123motao123/dev-workflow-kit/systematic-debugging/SKILL.md

systematic-debugging

Skill1 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when a bug, flaky test, or runtime failure does not have an obvious root cause. This skill emphasizes reproduction, narrowing the search space, hypothesis testing, and evidence before proposing a fix.

190 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use chinese-code-review, chinese-commit-conventions and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • Leodorareluctant259Skill

    chinese-code-review

    中文代码审查规范——在保持专业严谨的同时,用符合国内团队文化的方式给出有效反馈

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • Leodorareluctant259Skill

    chinese-commit-conventions

    中文 Git 提交规范 — 适配国内团队的 commit message 规范和 changelog 自动化

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • obraSkill

    diagnosing-superpowers

    Use when a superpowers session went wrong and your human partner wants to know why — repeated work, ignored plans, stumbles, poor results, a skill that didn't fire, "it took too long", "why is it so expensive", "what is it doing" — or wants to build a bug report for the superpowers maintainers, for the current session or a past one identified by id or path, on any harness.

    Also in 20 projects that use this

  • mjunaidcaSkill

    building-chatgpt-apps

    Guides creation of ChatGPT Apps with interactive widgets using OpenAI Apps SDK and MCP servers. Use when building ChatGPT custom apps with visual UI components, embedded widgets, or rich interactive experiences. Covers widget architecture, MCP server setup with FastMCP, response metadata, and Developer Mode configuration. NOT when building standard MCP servers without widgets (use building-mcp-servers skill instead).

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • mjunaidcaSkill

    building-chat-interfaces

    Build AI chat interfaces with custom backends, authentication, and context injection. Use when integrating chat UI with AI agents, adding auth to chat, injecting user/page context, or implementing httpOnly cookie proxies. Covers ChatKitServer, useChatKit, and MCP auth patterns. NOT when building simple chatbots without persistence or custom agent integration.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • +2 more from Leodorareluctant259
  • +5 more from mjunaidca

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 177 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill when the problem is not yet understood well enough to fix safely.

    line 9
  2. Distinctive:

    Use this skill when:

    line 13
  3. Distinctive:

    Do not use this skill for obvious typo-level fixes or when the exact code change is already known.

    line 20
  4. Very specific:

    use fix-ci if the main failure surface is pipeline-only

    line 45
  5. Very specific:

    use browser-verification when the bug is UI-visible

    line 46

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 177 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Systematic Debugging

Use this skill when the problem is not yet understood well enough to fix safely.

Trigger Conditions

Use this skill when:

  • a bug is intermittent or environment-specific
  • a test fails without a clear reason
  • symptoms are broad and the root cause is unknown
  • multiple possible failure layers exist
  • the user wants reproduction and diagnosis before implementation

Do not use this skill for obvious typo-level fixes or when the exact code change is already known.

Workflow

  1. Capture the observed failure and current evidence.
  2. Reproduce the issue or narrow why it cannot be reproduced.
  3. Reduce the search space by layer, component, or recent change.
  4. Form hypotheses and test them one by one.
  5. Separate symptoms from likely root cause.
  6. Recommend the smallest safe fix path.

Output

For non-trivial work, provide:

  • observed behavior
  • reproduction status
  • narrowed scope
  • hypotheses tested
  • likely root cause
  • recommended next step

Coordination

After diagnosis:

  • move from diagnosis into the active implementation workflow for the actual fix
  • use fix-ci if the main failure surface is pipeline-only
  • use browser-verification when the bug is UI-visible

Invocation Examples

  • "Use systematic-debugging to reproduce and narrow this flaky test failure."
  • "Use systematic-debugging before changing code; I want the root cause first."
  • "Use systematic-debugging to trace whether this is frontend, API, or database breakage."

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.