dependency-compliance-audit
Skill1 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when the main question is whether a third-party dependency is acceptable to adopt, upgrade, keep, or ship. This skill focuses on package risk, license or policy fit, supply-chain awareness, and recommended next actions.
In this repository21 other files it gives its agents.
- api-contract-compatibility-reviewSkill
- architecture-refactor-guidanceSkill
- browser-verificationSkill
- change-impact-analysisSkill
- cost-impact-reviewSkill
- data-migration-safety-reviewSkill
- data-quality-auditSkill
- docs-writerSkill
- environment-config-auditSkill
- fix-ciSkill
- incident-observability-triageSkill
- performance-investigationSkill
- planningSkill
- release-incident-postmortemSkill
- release-rollout-strategySkill
- review-address-commentsSkill
- security-reviewSkill
- ship-readinessSkill
- dev-workflow-kitSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- test-strategy-gap-reviewSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 9
Use this skill when package choice or package governance is the main blocker.
- Distinctive: line 13
Use this skill when:
- Distinctive: line 20
Do not use this skill for general code security review, product design, or final release signoff across the whole change.
- Distinctive: line 38
follow-up verification or documentation
- Very specific: line 43
use security-review if dependency concerns expand into runtime trust-boundary issues
- Very specific: line 44
use docs-writer if policy or migration notes should be recorded
- Very specific: line 45
use ship-readiness if package choice remains a release blocker
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Dependency Compliance Audit
Use this skill when package choice or package governance is the main blocker.
Trigger Conditions
Use this skill when:
- the user asks whether a new dependency is safe or acceptable to adopt
- license, policy, provenance, or supply-chain concerns are in scope
- a stale, risky, or vulnerable package needs to be evaluated
- package upgrade pressure is affecting release confidence
- the team needs a dependency-focused review before merge or release
Do not use this skill for general code security review, product design, or final release signoff across the whole change.
Workflow
- Identify the dependency or dependency set under review.
- Clarify whether the concern is security, license, policy, maintenance, provenance, or upgrade compatibility.
- Separate direct dependency concerns from broader code-path concerns.
- Classify risk and likely decision options.
- Recommend the smallest next action with the best tradeoff.
- Suggest any follow-up review or documentation needed.
Output
For non-trivial work, provide:
- dependency scope reviewed
- main risk categories
- likely policy or release concerns
- recommended decision path
- follow-up verification or documentation
Coordination
After audit:
- use
security-reviewif dependency concerns expand into runtime trust-boundary issues - use
docs-writerif policy or migration notes should be recorded - use
ship-readinessif package choice remains a release blocker
Invocation Examples
- "Use dependency-compliance-audit to review whether this new package is safe to adopt."
- "Use dependency-compliance-audit because the main concern is license and supply-chain fit."
- "Use dependency-compliance-audit to assess whether this outdated package is still acceptable for release."
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

