concurrency-debugging
Skill290 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Concurrency debugging skill for diagnosing data races and deadlocks. Use when reading TSan race reports, debugging deadlocks with GDB thread inspection, analyzing lock-order graphs with Helgrind, identifying std::atomic misuse patterns, or reasoning about happens-before in C++ and Rust. Activates on queries about data races, TSan reports, deadlocks, Helgrind, lock ordering, thread sanitizer output, or atomic ordering issues.
In this repository142 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- custom-allocatorsSkill
- numa-programmingSkill
- af-xdpSkill
- dpdkSkill
- io-uringSkill
- adc-dac-baremetalSkill
- baremetal-startupSkill
- bootloaders-embeddedSkill
- datasheet-and-refmanual-readingSkill
- dma-baremetalSkill
- gpio-baremetalSkill
- interrupts-and-exceptions-baremetalSkill
- low-power-embeddedSkill
- mmio-and-bit-manipulationSkill
- peripherals-from-datasheetSkill
- spi-i2c-baremetalSkill
- stm32-baremetalSkill
- timers-pwm-baremetalSkill
- uart-serial-baremetalSkill
- binutilsSkill
- dynamic-linkingSkill
- elf-inspectionSkill
- linkers-ltoSkill
- bazelSkill
- build-accelerationSkill
- cmakeSkill
- conan-vcpkgSkill
- include-what-you-useSkill
- makeSkill
- mesonSkill
- ninjaSkill
- static-analysisSkill
- code-generation-and-backendsSkill
- compiler-frontendSkill
- compiler-optimizations-deepSkill
- jit-compilationSkill
- llvm-ir-and-passesSkill
- llvm-passesSkill
- mlirSkill
- clangSkill
- cpp-modulesSkill
- cpp-templatesSkill
- cross-gccSkill
- gccSkill
- llvmSkill
- msvc-clSkill
- pgoSkill
- abi-and-calling-conventionsSkill
- branch-prediction-and-speculationSkill
- cpu-pipelines-and-hazardsSkill
- memory-hierarchy-and-cachesSkill
- virtual-memory-paging-and-tlbSkill
- core-dumpsSkill
- debug-optimized-buildsSkill
- dwarf-debug-formatSkill
- gdbSkill
- lldbSkill
- embedded-rustSkill
- freertosSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 234
Use skills/runtimes/sanitizers for TSan build flags and other sanitizers
- Very specific: line 235
Use skills/profilers/valgrind for Helgrind and Memcheck integration
- Very specific: line 236
Use skills/debuggers/gdb for advanced GDB thread inspection
- Very specific: line 237
Use skills/low-level-programming/memory-model for C++/Rust memory ordering theory
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Concurrency Debugging
Purpose
Guide agents through diagnosing and fixing concurrency bugs: reading ThreadSanitizer race reports, using Helgrind for lock-order analysis, detecting deadlocks with GDB thread inspection, identifying common std::atomic misuse patterns, and applying happens-before reasoning in C++ and Rust.
Triggers
- "ThreadSanitizer reported a data race — how do I read the report?"
- "My program deadlocks — how do I debug it?"
- "How do I use Helgrind to find threading bugs?"
- "Am I using std::atomic correctly?"
- "How does happens-before work in C++ memory ordering?"
- "How do I find which threads are deadlocked in GDB?"
Workflow
1. ThreadSanitizer (TSan) — race detection
# Build with TSan
clang -fsanitize=thread -g -O1 -o prog main.c
# or GCC
gcc -fsanitize=thread -g -O1 -o prog main.c
# Run (TSan intercepts memory accesses at runtime)
./prog
# TSan-specific options
TSAN_OPTIONS="halt_on_error=1:second_deadlock_stack=1" ./progReading a TSan report:
WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=12345)
Write of size 4 at 0x7f1234 by thread T2:
#0 increment /src/counter.c:8:5 ← access site in T2
#1 worker_thread /src/counter.c:22:3
Previous read of size 4 at 0x7f1234 by thread T1:
#0 read_counter /src/counter.c:3:14 ← conflicting access in T1
#1 main /src/counter.c:30:5
Thread T2 created at:
#0 pthread_create .../tsan_interceptors.cpp
#1 main /src/counter.c:28:3
SUMMARY: ThreadSanitizer: data race /src/counter.c:8:5 in incrementHow to read:
- Line 1: type of access (write/read) and address
- Stack under "Write of size": the thread that performed the write
- Stack under "Previous read/write": the conflicting thread
- "Thread T2 created at": where the thread was spawned
- Fix: the
incrementandread_counterfunctions access the same address without synchronization
Common races and fixes:
| Race pattern | Fix |
| Read/write on global without lock | Add mutex or use std::atomic |
Double-checked locking without atomic | Use std::once_flag + std::call_once |
+= on shared integer | Use std::atomic<int>::fetch_add() |
| Container modified while iterated | Lock entire critical section |
shared_ptr ref count race | Already safe (ref count is atomic); but pointed-to object may not be |
2. Helgrind — lock-order and race detection
Helgrind uses Valgrind infrastructure to detect lock ordering violations (potential deadlocks) and data races:
# Run with Helgrind
valgrind --tool=helgrind --log-file=helgrind.log ./prog
# Lock order violation report
==1234== Thread #3: lock order "0x... M2" after "0x... M1"
==1234== observed (incorrect) order
==1234== at pthread_mutex_lock (helgrind/...)
==1234== by worker2 /src/worker.c:45 ← T3 takes M2 then M1
==1234==
==1234== required order established by acquisition of lock at address 0x... M1
==1234== at pthread_mutex_lock
==1234== by worker1 /src/worker.c:31 ← T1 takes M1 then M2Lock-order violation = potential deadlock:
- Thread T1 acquires M1, then tries M2
- Thread T2 acquires M2, then tries M1
- Both can deadlock if they race
Fix: enforce a consistent global lock ordering. Always take M1 before M2 everywhere.
3. Deadlock detection with GDB
# Attach GDB to a deadlocked process
gdb -p $(pgrep prog)
# Or run under GDB then trigger deadlock
(gdb) info threads # list all threads and current state
# * 1 Thread 0x... (LWP 1234) "prog" ... in __lll_lock_wait ()
# 2 Thread 0x... (LWP 1235) "prog" ... in __lll_lock_wait ()
# Threads blocked in __lll_lock_wait = waiting for mutex
(gdb) thread 1
(gdb) bt # show which mutex thread 1 is waiting for
(gdb) thread 2
(gdb) bt # show which mutex thread 2 holds/waits
# Find the mutex owner
(gdb) p ((pthread_mutex_t*)0x601090)->__data.__owner # Linux glibc mutex
# prints TID of owning thread
# Python script to dump all mutex owners (GDB 7+)
python
import gdb
for t in gdb.selected_inferior().threads():
t.switch()
print(f"Thread {t.num}: {gdb.execute('bt 3', to_string=True)}")
end4. std::atomic misuse patterns
// WRONG: atomic variable, but non-atomic compound operation
std::atomic<int> counter{0};
if (counter == 0) counter = 1; // not atomic together! TOCTOU race
// CORRECT: use compare_exchange
int expected = 0;
counter.compare_exchange_strong(expected, 1);
// WRONG: relaxed ordering for sync flag
std::atomic<bool> ready{false};
// Producer:
data = 42;
ready.store(true, std::memory_order_relaxed); // WRONG: no happens-before
// CORRECT: release-acquire for publishing data
// Producer:
data = 42;
ready.store(true, std::memory_order_release); // syncs with acquire
// Consumer:
if (ready.load(std::memory_order_acquire)) { // syncs with release
use(data); // safe to read data here
}
// WRONG: using data across threads without atomic/mutex
// int shared_data; // non-atomic — UB on concurrent access
// CORRECT: protect with mutex or make atomic
std::mutex mtx;
std::unique_lock lock(mtx);
shared_data = 42;5. Happens-before reasoning
In C++, happens-before is established by:
Sequenced-before (within a thread):
Statement A comes before B in code → A happens-before B
Synchronizes-with (across threads):
store(release) → load(acquire) on SAME atomic variable
→ store happens-before load
→ everything before store happens-before everything after load
Thread creation/join:
spawn(T) → any action in T (create synchronizes-with)
any action in T → join(T) (join synchronizes-before)
Mutex:
unlock(M) → lock(M) (next acquirer)// Establishing happens-before across threads
std::atomic<int> flag{0};
int data = 0;
// Thread 1:
data = 42; // A
flag.store(1, memory_order_release); // B: A sequenced-before B
// Thread 2:
while (flag.load(memory_order_acquire) != 1) {} // C: synchronizes-with B
int x = data; // D: C sequenced-before D
// D reads 42: A happens-before B synchronizes-with C sequenced-before D
// → A happens-before D6. Rust concurrency — compile-time guarantees
Rust prevents data races at compile time via ownership:
use std::sync::{Arc, Mutex};
use std::thread;
// Shared mutable state: Arc<Mutex<T>>
let counter = Arc::new(Mutex::new(0u32));
let c = Arc::clone(&counter);
let t = thread::spawn(move || {
let mut val = c.lock().unwrap();
*val += 1;
});
t.join().unwrap();
println!("{}", *counter.lock().unwrap());
// Rust prevents:
// - Sharing &mut T across threads (Sync not impl for &mut T)
// - Moving non-Send types to threads (compiler error)
// Use TSAN_OPTIONS with cargo test if TSan checks are needed:
// RUSTFLAGS="-Z sanitizer=thread" cargo +nightly testRelated skills
- Use
skills/runtimes/sanitizersfor TSan build flags and other sanitizers - Use
skills/profilers/valgrindfor Helgrind and Memcheck integration - Use
skills/debuggers/gdbfor advanced GDB thread inspection - Use
skills/low-level-programming/memory-modelfor C++/Rust memory ordering theory
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

