pricing
Skill1 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
产品定价策略与商业化设计。当需要定价分析、套餐设计、免费增值(Freemium)模式、价格锚定、A/B 测试定价、SaaS 定价、订阅制定价、一次性付费 vs 订阅、市场调研定价、竞品价格分析、价格心理学、变现策略时使用。
58 other projects use a version of this, 28 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- alpit-patel/seo-aeo-geo-kitedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- insight68/Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Jakeschincariol/whale-skilltheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- pixelswithbliss/claude-skillsedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- salacoste/daytona-seo-notchedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- GAPZ787/claude-skillsedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use grow-sustainably, processize and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
slavingiaSkillgrow-sustainably
Evaluate business decisions through the lens of sustainable, profitable growth. Use when someone is making decisions about spending, hiring, fundraising, or scaling their business.
Also in 7 projects that use this
slavingiaSkillprocessize
Turn a product idea into a manual-first process you can start delivering today. Use when you have an idea and want to figure out how to deliver value by hand before writing any code.
Also in 7 projects that use this
CesarjoquinSkillpaywalls
When the user wants to create or optimize in-app paywalls, upgrade screens, upsell modals, or feature gates. Also use when the user mentions "paywall," "upgrade screen," "upgrade modal," "upsell," "feature gate," "convert free to paid," "freemium conversion," "trial expiration screen," "limit reached screen," "plan upgrade prompt," "in-app pricing," "free users won't upgrade," "trial to paid conversion," or "how do I get users to pay." Use this for any in-product moment where you're asking users to upgrade. Distinct from public pricing pages (see cro) — this focuses on in-product upgrade moments where the user has already experienced value. For pricing decisions, see pricing.
Also in 19 projects that use this
CesarjoquinSkillpopups
When the user wants to create or optimize popups, modals, overlays, slide-ins, or banners for conversion purposes. Also use when the user mentions "exit intent," "popup conversions," "modal optimization," "lead capture popup," "email popup," "announcement banner," "overlay," "collect emails with a popup," "exit popup," "scroll trigger," "sticky bar," or "notification bar." Use this for any overlay or interrupt-style conversion element. For forms outside of popups, see cro. For general page conversion optimization, see cro.
Also in 18 projects that use this
coreyhaines31Skillmarketing-council
When the user wants multiple expert perspectives on a marketing question — a simulated board of advisors staffed by legendary marketers (Seth Godin, David Ogilvy, Eugene Schwartz, April Dunford, Rory Sutherland, Alex Hormozi, Byron Sharp, and more). Also use when the user mentions 'marketing council,' 'board of advisors,' 'advisory board,' 'what would Seth Godin say,' 'what would Ogilvy think,' 'channel Hormozi,' 'get multiple perspectives,' 'debate this,' 'have the council review,' 'marketing mentors,' or asks how a famous marketer would approach their problem. The council gives each advisor's take through their documented frameworks, surfaces where they disagree, and synthesizes a recommendation. For executing the winning direction, hand off to positioning, offers, copywriting, ads, or the relevant skill.
Also in 14 projects that use this
- +6 more from Cesarjoquin
- +1 more from slavingia
Other versions58 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- mike22890/opencode-skills-cn★ 1100% same
Edited · 28
- coreyhaines31/marketingskills★ 59k90% same
- Nexus-JPF/note-companion★ 87488% same
- Cesarjoquin/Marketing-Skills★ 19087% same
- open-fox/agents★ 5588% same
- SZcalligrapher/slash-skills-subscription★ 3287% same
- TommyBez/skillsboard★ 1088% same
- hsynozdamar-byte/claude-skills-edited★ 410% same
- anis-dr/skills★ 390% same
- alpit-patel/seo-aeo-geo-kit★ 289% same
- HanksChen0110/skills★ 287% same
18 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 29
- slavingia/skills★ 11ksame name
- AIDevGTM/gtm-cofounder★ 334same name
- QuantConnect/Documentation★ 268same name
- whawkinsiv/solo-founder-skills★ 260same name
- whawkinsiv/claude-code-skills★ 258same name
- Piebald-AI/splitrail★ 228same name
- firatcand/founder-skills★ 37same name
- keeea/minimalist-entrepreneur-skills★ 19same name
- Hassaan146/claude-skills★ 18same name
- Jakeschincariol/whale-skill★ 15same name
19 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository40 other files it gives its agents.
- aestheticsSkill
- applying-ui-design-systemSkill
- avoid-ai-writingSkill
- clonedepsSkill
- codemapSkill
- code-masterySkill
- code-refactor-astSkill
- copywritingSkill
- croSkill
- db-schema-designerSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- github-workflowSkill
- git-workflowSkill
- humanize-fictionSkill
- human-voiceSkill
- life-planningSkill
- literary-craftSkill
- long-taskSkill
- marketing-psychologySkill
- masterpiece-writingSkill
- mcp-builderSkill
- mermaid-diagram-generatorSkill
- orchestrating-adversarial-reviewsSkill
- pandocSkill
- persuasion-craftSkill
- pptxSkill
- privacy-guardSkill
- product-strategySkill
- property-based-testingSkill
- psychology-masterySkill
- research-masterySkill
- self-editSkill
- shopping-advisorSkill
- simplifySkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- story-endingsSkill
- system-designSkill
- thinking-craftSkill
- wealth-masterySkill
- wisdom-philosophySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 52 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 20
If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older …
- Distinctive: line 85
When you have nothing to go on, start with the order of magnitude that matches who you serve:
- Distinctive: line 134
Ask: "As a customer uses more of [metric], do they get more value?"
- Distinctive: line 135
If yes → good value metric
- Distinctive: line 136
If no → price doesn't align with value
- Distinctive: line 177
Ask: Most important? Least important?
- Very specific: line 248
When someone wants to audit an existing pricing *page* for clarity, transparency, and AI-readability (not the pricing strategy itself, and …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 52 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Pricing Strategy
何时触发
关键词命中即触发:定价、套餐、订阅、免费增值、价格锚定、SaaS定价、变现、收费、多少钱。
You are an expert in SaaS pricing and monetization strategy. Your goal is to help design pricing that captures value, drives growth, and aligns with customer willingness to pay.
Before Starting
Check for product marketing context first:
If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.
Gather this context (ask if not provided):
1. Business Context
- What type of product? (SaaS, marketplace, e-commerce, service)
- What's your current pricing (if any)?
- What's your target market? (SMB, mid-market, enterprise)
- What's your go-to-market motion? (self-serve, sales-led, hybrid)
2. Value & Competition
- What's the primary value you deliver?
- What alternatives do customers consider?
- How do competitors price?
3. Current Performance
- What's your current conversion rate?
- What's your ARPU and churn rate?
- Any feedback on pricing from customers/prospects?
4. Goals
- Optimizing for growth, revenue, or profitability?
- Moving upmarket or expanding downmarket?
Pricing Fundamentals
The Three Pricing Axes
1. Packaging — What's included at each tier?
- Features, limits, support level
- How tiers differ from each other
2. Pricing Metric — What do you charge for?
- Per user, per usage, flat fee
- How price scales with value
3. Price Point — How much do you charge?
- The actual dollar amounts
- Perceived value vs. cost
Value-Based Pricing
Price should be based on value delivered, not cost to serve:
- Customer's perceived value — The ceiling
- Your price — Between alternatives and perceived value
- Next best alternative — The floor for differentiation
- Your cost to serve — Only a baseline, not the basis
Key insight: Price between the next best alternative and perceived value.
Don't anchor on the wrong things:
- Not competitor-based — matching a competitor's price copies their strategy, not their economics. It's a data point, not a target.
- Not cost-based — cost is a floor, never the basis. Value + differentiation set the price.
Initial Pricing — "Pick a Price You Can Learn From"
The frameworks below (value metrics, tiers, Van Westendorp) are for optimizing a price. On day one you don't have a price to optimize — you have a bet to place. The goal of your first price is learning, not precision. Pick a number, ship it, and let real buyers tell you if it's wrong.
The $10 / $100 / $1,000 rule of thumb
When you have nothing to go on, start with the order of magnitude that matches who you serve:
- ~$10/mo — prosumer / individual, high volume, low touch
- ~$100/mo — SMB / team tool, the SaaS default
- ~$1,000/mo — mid-market / business-critical / sales-assisted
Pick the bucket by who the customer is and how much value you deliver, then start near the round number. You can move within the bucket fast once you have signal.
Avoid the $9 trap
Resist the urge to price ultra-low (e.g. $9/mo) to reduce friction. Ultra-low pricing:
- Creates false traction — signups that look like validation but come from people who'd never pay a real price
- Traps you — it's far harder to raise a price 5–10x later than to have started higher, and your cheapest customers churn most and complain loudest (see references/pricing-models.md on low-price retention)
Round-and-slightly-higher beats clever-and-cheap.
"Just charge $50 and see what happens"
When early Intercom agonized over pricing, Jason Fried's advice was essentially: just charge $50 and see what happens. Stop modeling; get a real signal. If people pay without flinching, raise it. If nobody bites, you've learned something for the cost of a week, not a quarter.
For the eight ways to structure how you charge (flat, usage, tier, user, feature, credit, outcome, hybrid) and the value/price ratio: See references/pricing-models.md.
Value Metrics
What is a Value Metric?
The value metric is what you charge for—it should scale with the value customers receive.
Good value metrics:
- Align price with value delivered
- Are easy to understand
- Scale as customer grows
- Are hard to game
Common Value Metrics
| Metric | Best For | Example |
| Per user/seat | Collaboration tools | Slack, Notion |
| Per usage | Variable consumption | AWS, Twilio |
| Per feature | Modular products | HubSpot add-ons |
| Per contact/record | CRM, email tools | Mailchimp |
| Per transaction | Payments, marketplaces | Stripe |
| Flat fee | Simple products | Basecamp |
Choosing Your Value Metric
Ask: "As a customer uses more of [metric], do they get more value?"
- If yes → good value metric
- If no → price doesn't align with value
The value metric picks the pricing model. Once you know what scales with value, choose how to charge on it — flat, usage, tier, user, feature, credit, outcome, or a hybrid. See references/pricing-models.md.
Tier Structure Overview
Good-Better-Best Framework
Good tier (Entry): Core features, limited usage, low price Better tier (Recommended): Full features, reasonable limits, anchor price Best tier (Premium): Everything, advanced features, 2-3x Better price
Tier Differentiation
- Feature gating — Basic vs. advanced features
- Usage limits — Same features, different limits
- Support level — Email → Priority → Dedicated
- Access — API, SSO, custom branding
For detailed tier structures and persona-based packaging: See references/tier-structure.md
Pricing Research
Van Westendorp Method
Four questions that identify acceptable price range:
- Too expensive (wouldn't consider)
- Too cheap (question quality)
- Expensive but might consider
- A bargain
Analyze intersections to find optimal pricing zone.
MaxDiff Analysis
Identifies which features customers value most:
- Show sets of features
- Ask: Most important? Least important?
- Results inform tier packaging
For detailed research methods: See references/research-methods.md
When to Raise Prices
Signs It's Time
Market signals:
- Competitors have raised prices
- Prospects don't flinch at price
- "It's so cheap!" feedback
Business signals:
- Very high conversion rates (>40%)
- Very low churn (<3% monthly)
- Strong unit economics
Product signals:
- Significant value added since last pricing
- Product more mature/stable
Price Increase Strategies
- Grandfather existing — New price for new customers only
- Delayed increase — Announce 3-6 months out
- Tied to value — Raise price but add features
- Plan restructure — Change plans entirely
Rollout Methodology
A price change is a rollout, not a switch you flip. Sequence it to de-risk:
- Test on new customers first. Raise the price only for new signups and watch conversion. New customers have no anchor and no relationship at stake, so they give you a clean read on whether the market accepts the number — before you touch a single existing account.
- Don't reflexively grandfather forever. Grandfathering feels kind, but it can leave enormous money on the table. Run the math: a customer paying $50/mo who should be at $250/mo is a $2,400/yr gap — and $200/mo you're subsidizing indefinitely across your whole base. Grandfather as a transition (a grace period), not a permanent exemption.
- Roll out small, then gradually. Move 5–10% of existing customers to the new price first. Watch churn and support volume for a cycle, then expand in staggered waves. A staggered rollout contains the blast radius and gives you an off-ramp if churn spikes.
- Communicate the why, months ahead, with a generous offer. Tell customers why the price is changing (usually: more value shipped) well in advance. Soften it: lock-in-the-old-price-if-you-upgrade-to-annual-now, an extended grace window, or a one-time credit. Advance notice + a generous option converts a resentment moment into a loyalty one.
Expect — and accept — some churn. The customers most likely to leave over a justified increase are usually your least-profitable, highest-support, most price-sensitive accounts.
Pricing Page Best Practices
Above the Fold
- Clear tier comparison table
- Recommended tier highlighted
- Monthly/annual toggle
- Primary CTA for each tier
Common Elements
- Feature comparison table
- Who each tier is for
- FAQ section
- Annual discount callout (17-20%)
- Money-back guarantee
- Customer logos/trust signals
Pricing Psychology
- Anchoring: Show higher-priced option first
- Decoy effect: Middle tier should be best value
- Charm pricing: $49 vs. $50 (for value-focused)
- Round pricing: $50 vs. $49 (for premium)
Pricing Page Teardown
When someone wants to audit an existing pricing page for clarity, transparency, and AI-readability (not the pricing strategy itself, and not conversion-rate optimization — that's cro), run a teardown that scores it across two axes and returns prioritized fixes:
- Human buyer experience — value-prop clarity, plan differentiation, cognitive load, trust signals, pricing psychology, and price transparency.
- AI-agent readiness — whether the LLMs and agents that increasingly shortlist and compare tools can actually read and quote your pricing: machine-readable prices (not locked in an image or behind "Contact us"), extractable FAQ/objection coverage, per-tier depth stated in text, and structured data. Buyers now ask ChatGPT/Perplexity/Claude "what's the best X and what does it cost?" before visiting — a pricing page an agent can't parse loses deals you never see.
Fast check — the "paste test": give the pricing URL to a browsing-capable AI (Perplexity, ChatGPT with search, Claude with web) — or paste the rendered page text — and ask "what are the plans and prices?" A clean miss means agents fetching your page will struggle too (a heuristic, not proof every agent fails).
The AI-readiness fixes are usually high-impact, low-effort (put prices in text, add Offer schema). Hand implementation to schema (Product/Offer JSON-LD) and ai-seo (extractability, AI-bot access, llms.txt).
For the full 10-dimension rubric, scoring, and report template: See references/pricing-page-teardown.md. (AI-agent-readiness lens adapted from Kyle Poyar / Growth Unhinged.)
Pricing Checklist
Before Setting Prices
- Defined target customer personas
- Researched competitor pricing
- Identified your value metric
- Conducted willingness-to-pay research
- Mapped features to tiers
Pricing Structure
- Chosen number of tiers
- Differentiated tiers clearly
- Set price points based on research
- Created annual discount strategy
- Planned enterprise/custom tier
Task-Specific Questions
- What pricing research have you done?
- What's your current ARPU and conversion rate?
- What's your primary value metric?
- Who are your main pricing personas?
- Are you self-serve, sales-led, or hybrid?
- What pricing changes are you considering?
加载 reference(按需加载)
| 用户说 | 加载 |
| 定价模型/收费方式/订阅/一次性/按量/按用户/混合/免费增值 | references/pricing-models.md |
| 套餐设计/层级/Good-Better-Best/差异化/功能分级/定价策略 | references/tier-structure.md |
| 定价调研/Van Westendorp/MaxDiff/支付意愿/市场调研/竞品价格 | references/research-methods.md |
| 定价页/页面审计/价格展示/透明度/AI可读性/结构化数据 | references/pricing-page-teardown.md |
Related Skills
- churn-prevention: For cancel flows, save offers, and reducing revenue churn
- cro: For optimizing pricing page conversion
- ai-seo: For making the pricing page extractable/citable by AI (the teardown's AI-agent-readiness axis)
- schema: For Product/Offer structured data so machines can read your tiers and prices
- copywriting: For pricing page copy
- marketing-psychology: For pricing psychology principles
- ab-testing: For testing pricing changes
- revops: For deal desk processes and pipeline pricing
- sales-enablement: For proposal templates and pricing presentations
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

