schema-fix-writer
Skill7 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Propose schema markup changes from page type and SERP context. Use when Codex needs to write or fix structured data for better SERP display and rich results eligibility.
In this repository22 other files it gives its agents.
- authority-mark-keyword-difficultySkill
- cannibalization-checkSkill
- client-report-writerSkill
- competitor-serp-monitorSkill
- content-decay-monitor-setupSkill
- content-moat-plannerSkill
- content-refresh-briefSkill
- exceed-quality-thresholdSkill
- internal-link-builderSkill
- keyword-opportunity-finderSkill
- keyword-plannerSkill
- live-search-console-dataSkill
- proposal-builderSkill
- refresh-vs-new-contentSkill
- seo-content-briefSkill
- seo-growth-loopSkill
- seo-offer-architectSkill
- seo-priority-scoreSkill
- seo-strategySkill
- technical-seo-triageSkill
- title-meta-rewriterSkill
- traffic-decay-detectorSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 21
Check the page's current schema markup for errors or missing fields.
- Distinctive: line 24
Add missing schema type for the page type
- Distinctive: line 26
Add relevant properties (review, FAQ, how-to steps, etc.)
- Distinctive: line 27
Remove deceptive or irrelevant markup
- Distinctive: line 28
Write the JSON-LD or microdata snippet.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Schema Fix Writer
Overview
Given a page URL and its content, analyze what schema types would be appropriate and propose specific JSON-LD or microdata changes. Uses the page type (article, product, FAQ, how-to, local business, etc.) and current SERP features to determine the best schema strategy.
Inputs
- Page URL and optionally its rendered content
- Current schema (if any) — paste from source or tool output
- Page type or topic
Workflow
- Determine the page type from content analysis.
- Check the page's current schema markup for errors or missing fields.
- Research the target SERP for rich result types present.
- Propose schema changes:
- Add missing schema type for the page type
- Fix validation errors in existing schema
- Add relevant properties (review, FAQ, how-to steps, etc.)
- Remove deceptive or irrelevant markup
- Write the JSON-LD or microdata snippet.
- Include testing instructions (Schema.org validator, Rich Results Test).
Output
Schema recommendation with proposed markup, validation notes, and SERP eligibility impact.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

