content-moat-planner
Skill7 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Build durable topical clusters based on authority and product fit. Use when Codex needs to plan a content strategy that creates defensible competitive advantages through comprehensive topic coverage.
In this repository22 other files it gives its agents.
- authority-mark-keyword-difficultySkill
- cannibalization-checkSkill
- client-report-writerSkill
- competitor-serp-monitorSkill
- content-decay-monitor-setupSkill
- content-refresh-briefSkill
- exceed-quality-thresholdSkill
- internal-link-builderSkill
- keyword-opportunity-finderSkill
- keyword-plannerSkill
- live-search-console-dataSkill
- proposal-builderSkill
- refresh-vs-new-contentSkill
- schema-fix-writerSkill
- seo-content-briefSkill
- seo-growth-loopSkill
- seo-offer-architectSkill
- seo-priority-scoreSkill
- seo-strategySkill
- technical-seo-triageSkill
- title-meta-rewriterSkill
- traffic-decay-detectorSkill
The file
Files
Content Moat Planner
Overview
Design a topical cluster strategy that builds a defensible content moat. Instead of chasing individual keywords, plan comprehensive topic hubs that establish authority depth, interlink tightly, and out-resource competitors on high-value topics.
Inputs
- Site's current topical map or content inventory
- Competitor topical coverage analysis
- Product/service categories and conversion paths
Workflow
- Identify the site's core topics where it has or can build unique authority.
- Map each topic to a conversion path or business goal.
- Analyze competitor coverage for each topic: depth, breadth, freshness.
- Design the cluster architecture:
- Pillar page: comprehensive topic overview
- Cluster pages: specific subtopics, questions, angles
- Support content: data, tools, comparisons
- Plan internal link structure within each cluster.
- Estimate the content investment per cluster.
- Prioritize clusters by: authority potential, search demand, conversion proximity.
Output
Content moat plan with cluster architecture, pillar/cluster assignments, internal link map, and investment estimate.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.