browser-verify
Skill1 starsChanged 10 days agoMITView on GitHub
Runtime verification of client-side findings in a real browser engine (Playwright/Chromium). Use whenever a finding's impact lives in the browser — DOM/reflected/stored XSS, clickjacking, client-side open redirects — and the only evidence so far is HTTP traffic or static bundle analysis (`Inferred`). A client-side finding is only `Demonstrated` when an observable effect fired at runtime (dialog, DOM marker, frame load); code reading never counts. Run after evidence-hygiene and before finding-validation, so the four gates see runtime-grade evidence.
- Installs packages
9 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- LiriRaid/waymarktheir own version, first seen Oct 27, 2026
- AndyForest/SoupNettheir own version, first seen Oct 26, 2026
- feelthefusion/skill-starter-kittheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- chrisalehman/bionictheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- Mr-Quin/danmaku-anywheretheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- aprameyak/coding-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 2, 2026
Other versions9 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 9
- Mr-Quin/danmaku-anywhere★ 550same name
- AndyForest/SoupNet★ 11same name
- chrisalehman/bionic★ 9same name
- LiriRaid/waymark★ 2same name
- aprameyak/coding-skills★ 1same name
- BlakeHastings/claude-code-artifacts★ 1same name
- Evan-Kim2028/agent-skills★ 1same name
- feelthefusion/skill-starter-kit★ 0same name
- Koshux/agentic-sdlc-scaffold★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository124 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- ai-agent-reconSkill
- ai-supply-chainSkill
- exfiltration-via-aiSkill
- indirect-injectionSkill
- llm-fuzzingSkill
- prompt-injectionSkill
- rag-poisoningSkill
- tool-abuseSkill
- chain-analysisSkill
- chain-auth-to-takeoverSkill
- chain-customSkill
- chain-graph-walkSkill
- chain-idor-to-mass-dataSkill
- chain-info-to-exploitSkill
- chain-multi-appSkill
- chain-ssrf-to-cloudSkill
- chain-web-to-rceSkill
- chain-xss-to-account-takeoverSkill
- email-securitySkill
- engagement-flowSkill
- finding-disciplineSkill
- http-headers-securitySkill
- oob-interactionsSkill
- opsec-disciplineSkill
- research-firstSkill
- scope-disciplineSkill
- scope-importSkill
- session-contextSkill
- 2fa-bypassSkill
- api-abuseSkill
- auth-bypassSkill
- broken-access-controlSkill
- business-logicSkill
- cache-poisoningSkill
- clickjackingSkill
- corsSkill
- credential-testingSkill
- crlf-injectionSkill
- cryptographic-oracleSkill
- csrfSkill
- css-injectionSkill
- data-exfiltration-testSkill
- deserializationSkill
- email-injectionSkill
- file-uploadSkill
- fuzzingSkill
- graphqlSkill
- grpcSkill
- host-headerSkill
- http-smugglingSkill
- idorSkill
- info-disclosureSkill
- jwtSkill
- lateral-movementSkill
- lfi-rfiSkill
- mass-assignmentSkill
- oauthSkill
- open-redirectSkill
- parameter-pollutionSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 9 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 42
Place the payload in the URL exactly as a victim would receive it and load it headless:
- Very specific: line 65
Wait budget: admin panels render async — the probe already waits post-networkidle.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 9 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Signals
- A candidate XSS (DOM, reflected, or stored) was identified by static analysis of the JS
bundle, a suspicious sink (
innerHTML,bypassSecurityTrust*,document.write), or a reflected parameter — but nothing has executed in a browser yet. - A clickjacking candidate: page without
X-Frame-Options/frame-ancestorson paper, but no actual framing test was run (headers can be injected by a middlebox — trust the render). - An OAST blind-XSS callback arrived (
engine/oast.py) and you want the in-browser effect captured as visual evidence for the report.
Prerequisites
- Playwright installed:
python3 -m pip install playwright && python3 -m playwright install chromium.engine/browser_verify.pyfails closed with these instructions if missing — never mark a finding Demonstrated because the probe errored. - Scope allows active client-side testing (default for web engagements; confirm for targets with third-party SSO flows you might trigger).
- For stored XSS: the payload is already planted (via API/registration/import) and you hold a viewer-level session that renders the sink page (e.g. admin panel).
Method
1. Reflected / DOM XSS
Place the payload in the URL exactly as a victim would receive it and load it headless:
python3 -m engine.browser_verify reflected-xss \
"https://target/#/search?q=<PAYLOAD>" --out-dir evidence/- Success signal: a
dialog:*effect (alert/confirm fired by the canary) — definitive, cannot be produced by anything but script execution. demonstrated: falsewith a clean run = lead staysInferred; report the sink, not the vuln.- Save the JSON result + screenshot (SHA-256 included) as finding evidence.
2. Stored XSS
Plant a payload whose canary fires on render, then open the viewer page authenticated:
python3 -m engine.browser_verify stored-xss "https://target/#/administration" \
--marker xssprobe7f3a --token "$VIEWER_JWT" --out-dir evidence/- The token is injected into localStorage/sessionStorage before page scripts run (standard SPA bearer pattern). If the app uses cookies, attach them via a short Playwright script instead.
- Wait budget: admin panels render async — the probe already waits post-
networkidle. - One marker per attempt; reuse of markers across findings breaks correlation (same rule as OAST).
3. Clickjacking
python3 -m engine.browser_verify clickjacking "https://target/account" --out-dir evidence/Demonstrated only when the page actually loads inside a foreign-origin iframe AND no
frame-ancestors/X-Frame-Options was sent. Header-present-but-rendered still counts as
vulnerable — the render is the ground truth.
Anti-fabrication rules
Inferred(static analysis, WAF-blocked attempts) findings never becomevalidatedthrough this skill unless a probe returnsdemonstrated: true.- A probe that errors (timeout, crash, missing binary) is no result, not a negative result: record it as unproven and say the verification is pending.
- Screenshot evidence must carry its SHA-256 (the module does this) and enters the custody log like any other artifact.
Common pitfalls
- Payload eaten by the framework's sanitizer: try the encoding/context variants from
references/payloads/before declaring the sink safe — one bypass is enough for Demonstrated. - Angular/Vue hash routes: pass the full URL including
#/…; the router runs client-side. javascript:URIs in modern Chromium may require user activation; prefer<img src=x onerror=…>or<svg onload=…>vectors for reliability.- Headless detection: some apps behave differently headless. If a Demonstrated effect
matters for the report, note
headless: truein the evidence metadata.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

