agentleFS
Sign inStart free
latour-ailatour-ai/skills/fomc-statement-diff/SKILL.md

fomc-statement-diff

Skill69 starsChanged 24 days agoNo licenceView on GitHub

Produce a word-level redline of a central bank policy statement against the prior meeting's, classify every substantive change as hawkish, dovish, or neutral with one line of reasoning each, summarize dot-plot and projection shifts when a SEP is released, and test whether the market's first move is trading the text or something else. Works for the FOMC and equally for ECB, BoE, BoJ, BoC, and RBA statements. For macro and rates portfolio managers, traders, multi-asset investors, economists, and market strategists. Trigger on phrases like "diff the FOMC statement," "what changed from last meeting," "redline the Fed statement," "is this hawkish or dovish," "read the ECB statement against the last one," "Fed day," "what did they take out," "dot plot changes," or when a user pastes two central bank statements. Requires both statements to be provided — it never reconstructs a statement from memory. Do NOT use for summarizing a speech or testimony from a single official. Do NOT use for a company earnings call — use the earnings-call-extractor skill. Not investment advice.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free