agentleFS
Sign inStart free
latour-ailatour-ai/skills/ddq-answer-library-curator/SKILL.md

ddq-answer-library-curator

Skill69 starsChanged 25 days agoNo licenceView on GitHub

Run the quarterly hygiene pass on a firm's DDQ answer library: reconcile every answer against the current golden-source documents (PPM, Form ADV, compliance manual, fund reports, team pages), flag every figure that no longer matches the source with both values side by side, flag answers referencing superseded policies, departed personnel, or prior-fund terms, flag answers past their re-approval window, and identify duplicate or near-duplicate answers to consolidate — outputting a fix-list grouped by answer owner and ranked by risk. For IR, fundraising, COO, and compliance teams at private equity, private credit, hedge fund, real assets, and venture managers. Trigger on phrases like "audit the answer library," "scrub the DDQ library," "staleness check," "quarterly library review," "are our DDQ answers current," "dedupe the answer library," or when a user uploads an answer library export alongside current fund documents. Do NOT use for drafting responses to an incoming DDQ or consultant RFP — use the ddq-response-drafter skill. Never rewrites an approved answer itself; it flags, recommends, and routes to owners for re-approval.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free