remotion-delivery-qa
Skill1 starsChanged 36 days agoMITView on GitHub
Run reproducible delivery QA on Remotion MP4 exports, covering transition frame extraction, full-frame technical and text-edge checks, audio track verification, and dual-directory archiving of deliverables and project files. Only for Remotion export acceptance; not for general code review or ordinary web testing.
In this repository30 other files it gives its agents.
- anna-app-publishSkill
- campus-jobs-radarSkill
- career-pivot-researchSkill
- cf-pages-deploySkill
- company-risk-checkSkill
- github-repo-launch-polishSkill
- github-repo-repair-auditSkill
- headless-webapp-screenshotsSkill
- historical-remotion-filmSkill
- interview-debriefSkill
- job-application-screenerSkill
- job-application-trackerSkill
- llm-output-eval-gateSkill
- memory-sync-abcSkill
- offer-decision-frameworkSkill
- online-assessment-solverSkill
- personal-secretary-memorySkill
- personal-tone-writingSkill
- portfolio-github-workflowSkill
- recruiting-source-huntingSkill
- resume-jd-matcherSkill
- resume-jd-tailorSkill
- resume-polish-craftSkill
- session-checkpointSkill
- session-log-archaeologySkill
- single-file-html-toolSkill
- static-site-deploy-verifySkill
- vibecoding-resume-storySkill
- video-portfolio-performanceSkill
- workflow-distillerSkill
The file
Files
Remotion 导出与交付 QA
把“渲染成功”“全帧技术检查”“代表帧视觉检查”和“完整播放听审”分开记录。只报告真正完成的检查范围。
按需要进入
- 选 composition、导出与定位旧文件:读 导出身份。
- 检查正文/注释排版和转场:读 文字与抽帧。
- 检查 MP4、帧数、音轨与分轨:读 媒体验证。
- 整理用户给出的两个目录:读 交付归档。
不可混淆的结果
- 脚本逐帧检查边界、透明度或解码,不能证明每帧美观。
- 抽查清晰关键帧,不能证明转场没有一帧重叠、裁切或闪白。
- 原 WAV 存在,不能证明 MP4 内有正确音轨;静音 MP4 也能正常渲染成功。
- 旧版和本次版使用不同 composition 或文件名时,不能凭“目录里有 MP4”认定成功。
在确有导出任务时沿用当前依赖版本与已验证渲染入口;先修具体问题,再做针对性复检。不要每次都重跑与本次改动无关的完整审计。
Example
A delivery report that separates what was actually checked:
渲染 Remotion render 成功,composition=main,1920x1080,30fps
全帧技术 抽帧 900 帧,全部检查,无黑帧无撕裂
文字边界 逐帧检查字幕安全区,第 412 帧右侧超出 3px(已记录)
音轨 ffprobe:2 轨(aac 48kHz),时长 30.00s,与合成一致
完整播放 人工听审通过
归档 成片入 deliverables/,工程入 project/"渲染成功" is never reported as "质量已验收".
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

