agentleFS
jabrenajabrena/cursor-rules-java/skills/143-java-functional-exception-handling/SKILL.md

143-java-functional-exception-handling

Skill452 starsChanged 3 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Use when you need to apply functional exception handling best practices in Java — including replacing exception overuse with Optional and VAVR Either types, designing error type hierarchies using sealed classes and enums, implementing monadic error composition pipelines, establishing functional control flow patterns, and reserving exceptions only for truly exceptional system-level failures. This should trigger for requests such as Improve the code with Functional Exception Handling; Apply Functional Exception Handling; Refactor the code with Functional Exception Handling; Model Java errors with Result or Either types; Replace exception-heavy flows with functional error handling. Part of Plinth Toolkit

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

10 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 7

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Before applying any functional exception handling changes, ensure the project validates.

    line 29
  2. Very specific:

    MANDATORY: Run ./mvnw validate or mvn validate before applying any changes

    line 31
  3. Distinctive:

    SAFETY: If validation fails, stop immediately — do not proceed until the project is in a valid state

    line 32
  4. Very specific:

    DEPENDENCY: When introducing Either types, confirm VAVR (io.vavr:vavr) and SLF4J are present

    line 33
  5. Very specific:

    VERIFY: Run ./mvnw clean verify or mvn clean verify after applying improvements

    line 34
  6. Distinctive:

    BEFORE APPLYING: Read the reference for detailed good/bad examples, constraints, and safeguards for each functional exception handling …

    line 35
  7. Very specific:

    Run ./mvnw validate or mvn validate and stop immediately if validation fails.

    line 49
  8. Very specific:

    When introducing Either, confirm VAVR (io.vavr:vavr) and SLF4J are present before implementation.

    line 53
  9. Very specific:

    Read references/143-java-functional-exception-handling.md and identify places to replace exception-heavy control flow with monadic error …

    line 57
  10. Very specific:

    Run ./mvnw clean verify or mvn clean verify after applying improvements.

    line 65

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Java Functional Exception handling Best Practices

Identify and apply functional exception handling best practices in Java to improve error clarity, maintainability, and performance by eliminating exception overuse in favour of monadic error types.

What is covered in this Skill?

  • Optional<T> for nullable values over throwing NullPointerException or NotFoundException
  • VAVR Either<L,R> for predictable business-logic failures
  • CompletableFuture<T> for async error handling
  • Sealed classes and records for rich error type hierarchies with exhaustive pattern matching
  • Enum-based error types for simple failure cases
  • Functional composition: flatMap/map/peek/peekLeft for chaining operations that can fail
  • Structured logging: warn/info for business failures, error for system failures
  • Checked vs unchecked exception discipline
  • Exception chaining with full causal context when exceptions are unavoidable

Scope: The reference is organized by examples (good/bad code patterns) for each core area. Apply recommendations based on applicable examples.

Constraints

Before applying any functional exception handling changes, ensure the project validates. When introducing Either types, confirm the VAVR dependency (io.vavr:vavr) and SLF4J are present.

  • MANDATORY: Run ./mvnw validate or mvn validate before applying any changes
  • SAFETY: If validation fails, stop immediately — do not proceed until the project is in a valid state
  • DEPENDENCY: When introducing Either types, confirm VAVR (io.vavr:vavr) and SLF4J are present
  • VERIFY: Run ./mvnw clean verify or mvn clean verify after applying improvements
  • BEFORE APPLYING: Read the reference for detailed good/bad examples, constraints, and safeguards for each functional exception handling pattern

When to use this skill

  • Improve the code with Functional Exception Handling
  • Apply Functional Exception Handling
  • Refactor the code with Functional Exception Handling
  • Model Java errors with Result or Either types
  • Replace exception-heavy flows with functional error handling

Workflow

  1. Validate project before functional-exception changes

Run ./mvnw validate or mvn validate and stop immediately if validation fails.

  1. Check required dependencies

When introducing Either, confirm VAVR (io.vavr:vavr) and SLF4J are present before implementation.

  1. Read functional-exception reference and identify targets

Read references/143-java-functional-exception-handling.md and identify places to replace exception-heavy control flow with monadic error types.

  1. Apply functional exception-handling refactorings

Implement selected Optional/Either/async error patterns with structured logging and clear error contracts.

  1. Verify with full build

Run ./mvnw clean verify or mvn clean verify after applying improvements.

Reference

For detailed guidance, examples, and constraints, see references/143-java-functional-exception-handling.md.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.