agentleFS
jabrenajabrena/cursor-rules-java/skills/023-assumption-analysis/SKILL.md

023-assumption-analysis

Skill452 starsChanged 3 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Use when a framed and root-caused problem needs its assumptions made explicit before design or planning begins — explicit Assumptions, Unknowns, and a Validation plan. This should trigger when an issue's Assumption Analysis point of view needs evaluation, or when a maintainer directly asks to surface hidden assumptions and unknowns before committing to an approach. Part of Plinth Toolkit

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    MUST: read references/023-assumption-analysis.md before applying Assumption Analysis guidance

    line 25
  2. Very specific:

    Read references/023-assumption-analysis.md, then review the problem frame and root-cause findings for implicit beliefs.

    line 44

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Assumption Analysis

Guide production of explicit Assumptions, a list of Unknowns, and a Validation plan for a problem under exploration. This is an interactive SKILL.

What is covered in this Skill?

  • Surfacing assumptions implicit in the problem frame and root-cause findings
  • Distinguishing an assumption (believed true, not yet verified) from an unknown (not yet known either way)
  • Ranking assumptions and unknowns by impact and confidence
  • Defining a validation plan that names how and when each risky assumption or unknown will be checked
  • Feeding assumption and unknown findings into 024-context-mapping and the remaining Functional Specification lenses

Constraints

Make assumptions and unknowns explicit before they become undiscussed risk. When this technique is orchestrated by another workflow, the orchestrator owns clarifying-question sequencing; when applied standalone, ask directly.

  • MUST read references/023-assumption-analysis.md before applying Assumption Analysis guidance
  • MUST state each assumption as a falsifiable claim believed true but not yet verified
  • MUST distinguish assumptions (believed true) from unknowns (not yet known either way)
  • MUST rank assumptions and unknowns by impact if wrong and by current confidence
  • MUST define a validation plan naming how and when each high-impact, low-confidence assumption or unknown will be checked
  • MUST NOT invent an assumption, unknown, or validation step when the available content is vague or ambiguous; flag the gap for a clarifying question instead

When to use this skill

  • Surface the assumptions behind this problem
  • List the unknowns for this issue
  • Build a validation plan for these assumptions
  • Apply assumption analysis before design begins
  • Draft the Assumption Analysis section of a Functional Specification

Workflow

  1. Read the Reference

Read references/023-assumption-analysis.md, then review the problem frame and root-cause findings for implicit beliefs.

  1. Surface Explicit Assumptions

State each assumption as a falsifiable claim believed true but not yet verified.

  1. List Unknowns

List facts that are not yet known either way, distinct from assumptions.

  1. Rank by Impact and Confidence

Rank assumptions and unknowns by impact if wrong and by current confidence, prioritizing high-impact, low-confidence items.

  1. Define the Validation Plan

Name how and when each high-priority assumption or unknown will be validated.

  1. Report the Assumption Analysis

Report the Assumptions, Unknowns, and Validation plan, and flag any item left open pending a clarifying answer.

Reference

For detailed guidance, examples, and constraints, see references/023-assumption-analysis.md.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.