022-root-cause-analysis
Skill452 starsChanged 3 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Use when a framed problem needs root-cause investigation rather than a symptom-level fix, applying Five Whys, Fishbone (Ishikawa), Current Reality Tree, and constraint identification. This should trigger when an issue's Root Cause Analysis point of view needs evaluation, or when a maintainer directly asks to find the root cause of a problem before proposing a fix. Part of Plinth Toolkit
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 26
MUST: read references/022-root-cause-analysis.md before applying Root Cause Analysis guidance
- Distinctive: line 39
Use Current Reality Tree to connect these symptoms
- Very specific: line 47
Read references/022-root-cause-analysis.md, then identify the symptom(s) evidenced by the problem frame.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Root Cause Analysis
Guide the identification of root causes, not symptoms, for a framed problem, using Five Whys, Fishbone (Ishikawa), Current Reality Tree, and constraint identification. This is an interactive SKILL.
What is covered in this Skill?
- Five Whys for a linear causal chain from a symptom to a root cause
- Fishbone (Ishikawa) for categorized candidate causes across multiple dimensions
- Current Reality Tree for interconnected causes and effects with a small number of core problems
- Constraint identification for the limiting factor holding the current state in place
- Choosing the technique(s) proportionate to the problem's complexity
- Feeding root-cause findings into
023-assumption-analysisand the remaining Functional Specification lenses
Constraints
Distinguish root causes from symptoms before recommending a fix. When this technique is orchestrated by another workflow, the orchestrator owns clarifying-question sequencing; when applied standalone, ask directly.
- MUST read
references/022-root-cause-analysis.mdbefore applying Root Cause Analysis guidance - MUST distinguish a symptom (an observed effect) from a root cause (the condition that produces it)
- MUST apply Five Whys as a chain of "why" questions grounded in evidence from the problem frame, not assumption
- MUST apply Fishbone to organize candidate causes into categories (for example people, process, technology, environment) when more than one causal dimension is plausible
- MUST apply Current Reality Tree when multiple symptoms may share one or a small number of core problems connected by cause-effect relationships
- MUST identify the constraint limiting the current state, not only the most visible cause
- MUST NOT invent a root cause when the available evidence is vague or ambiguous; flag the gap for a clarifying question instead
When to use this skill
- Find the root cause of this problem
- Apply Five Whys to this issue
- Build a Fishbone diagram for this problem
- Use Current Reality Tree to connect these symptoms
- Identify the constraint limiting the current state
- Draft the Root Cause Analysis section of a Functional Specification
Workflow
- Read the Reference
Read references/022-root-cause-analysis.md, then identify the symptom(s) evidenced by the problem frame.
- Apply Five Whys
Chain "why" questions from the symptom toward an evidenced root cause, stopping when further "why" steps would require guessing.
- Apply Fishbone When Multiple Dimensions Are Plausible
Organize candidate causes into categories when more than one causal dimension (people, process, technology, environment) is plausible.
- Apply Current Reality Tree When Symptoms Interconnect
Connect multiple symptoms to a small number of shared core problems through cause-effect relationships when the symptoms appear related.
- Identify the Constraint
Name the constraint limiting the current state, distinct from the most visible or most recently reported cause.
- Report the Root Cause Findings
Report findings using Five Whys, Fishbone, Current Reality Tree, and the identified constraint, and flag any finding left open pending a clarifying answer.
Reference
For detailed guidance, examples, and constraints, see references/022-root-cause-analysis.md.
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- jabrena/plinth★ 448100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository124 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- 001-commands-inventorySkill
- 002-agents-inventorySkill
- 003-skills-inventorySkill
- 004-commands-installationSkill
- 005-agents-installationSkill
- 012-agile-epicSkill
- 013-agile-featureSkill
- 014-agile-user-storySkill
- 021-problem-framingSkill
- 023-assumption-analysisSkill
- 024-context-mappingSkill
- 025-quality-attribute-discoverySkill
- 030-architecture-adr-generalSkill
- 033-architecture-diagramsSkill
- 041-planning-plan-modeSkill
- 042-planning-openspecSkill
- 043-planning-github-issuesSkill
- 044-planning-jiraSkill
- 045-planning-azure-devopsSkill
- 051-design-two-steps-methodsSkill
- 052-design-hamburger-methodSkill
- 053-design-simple-rulesSkill
- 054-design-tddSkill
- 055-design-parallel-changeSkill
- 056-design-avoid-breaking-changesSkill
- 057-design-feature-togglesSkill
- 058-design-bddSkill
- 059-design-atddSkill
- 110-java-maven-best-practicesSkill
- 111-java-maven-dependenciesSkill
- 112-java-maven-pluginsSkill
- 113-java-maven-documentationSkill
- 114-java-maven-searchSkill
- 121-java-object-oriented-designSkill
- 122-java-type-designSkill
- 123-java-design-patternsSkill
- 124-java-secure-codingSkill
- 125-java-concurrencySkill
- 126-java-exception-handlingSkill
- 128-java-genericsSkill
- 130-java-testing-strategiesSkill
- 131-java-testing-unit-testingSkill
- 132-java-testing-integration-testingSkill
- 133-java-testing-acceptance-testsSkill
- 141-java-refactoring-with-modern-featuresSkill
- 142-java-functional-programmingSkill
- 143-java-functional-exception-handlingSkill
- 144-java-data-oriented-programmingSkill
- 145-java-refactoring-high-performanceSkill
- 151-java-performance-jmeterSkill
- 152-java-performance-gatlingSkill
- 161-java-profiling-detectSkill
- 162-java-profiling-analyzeSkill
- 163-java-profiling-refactorSkill
- 164-java-profiling-verifySkill
- 170-java-documentationSkill
- 181-java-observability-loggingSkill
- 182-java-observability-metrics-micrometerSkill
- 183-java-observability-tracing-opentelemetrySkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

