024-context-mapping
Skill452 starsChanged 3 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Use when a problem under exploration needs its surrounding system context identified before design begins — Existing systems, Integrations, Ownership, and External dependencies. This should trigger when an issue's Context Mapping point of view needs evaluation, or when a maintainer directly asks to map the systems, integrations, owners, and external dependencies relevant to a problem. Part of Plinth Toolkit
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 25
MUST: read references/024-context-mapping.md before applying Context Mapping guidance
- Very specific: line 44
Read references/024-context-mapping.md, then review the problem frame for systems already implicated by the problem.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Context Mapping
Guide identification of Existing systems, Integrations, Ownership, and External dependencies relevant to a problem under exploration. This is an interactive SKILL.
What is covered in this Skill?
- Identifying existing systems that already touch the problem area
- Mapping integrations and data flows between those systems
- Naming ownership: who operates, maintains, or is accountable for each system or integration
- Identifying external dependencies (third-party services, other teams, contracts) outside the team's direct control
- Feeding context-mapping findings into
025-quality-attribute-discoveryand the remaining Functional Specification lenses
Constraints
Map the surrounding context before any design decision assumes a system boundary. When this technique is orchestrated by another workflow, the orchestrator owns clarifying-question sequencing; when applied standalone, ask directly.
- MUST read
references/024-context-mapping.mdbefore applying Context Mapping guidance - MUST identify existing systems that already touch the problem area, not only the system expected to change
- MUST identify integrations and data flows between the identified systems
- MUST name an owner (team or role) for each identified system or integration when known
- MUST identify external dependencies outside the team's direct control, such as third-party services, other teams, or contracts
- MUST NOT invent a system, integration, owner, or external dependency when the available content is vague or ambiguous; flag the gap for a clarifying question instead
When to use this skill
- Map the systems and integrations around this problem
- Identify ownership for these systems
- List the external dependencies for this issue
- Apply context mapping before design begins
- Draft the Context Mapping section of a Functional Specification
Workflow
- Read the Reference
Read references/024-context-mapping.md, then review the problem frame for systems already implicated by the problem.
- Identify Existing Systems
List existing systems that already touch the problem area, including systems that are affected but not expected to change.
- Map Integrations
Identify integrations and data flows between the identified systems.
- Name Ownership
Name an owning team or role for each identified system or integration when known.
- Identify External Dependencies
Identify third-party services, other teams, or contracts outside the team's direct control that the problem or its resolution depends on.
- Report the Context Map
Report Existing systems, Integrations, Ownership, and External dependencies, and flag any item left open pending a clarifying answer.
Reference
For detailed guidance, examples, and constraints, see references/024-context-mapping.md.
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- jabrena/plinth★ 448100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository124 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- 001-commands-inventorySkill
- 002-agents-inventorySkill
- 003-skills-inventorySkill
- 004-commands-installationSkill
- 005-agents-installationSkill
- 012-agile-epicSkill
- 013-agile-featureSkill
- 014-agile-user-storySkill
- 021-problem-framingSkill
- 022-root-cause-analysisSkill
- 023-assumption-analysisSkill
- 025-quality-attribute-discoverySkill
- 030-architecture-adr-generalSkill
- 033-architecture-diagramsSkill
- 041-planning-plan-modeSkill
- 042-planning-openspecSkill
- 043-planning-github-issuesSkill
- 044-planning-jiraSkill
- 045-planning-azure-devopsSkill
- 051-design-two-steps-methodsSkill
- 052-design-hamburger-methodSkill
- 053-design-simple-rulesSkill
- 054-design-tddSkill
- 055-design-parallel-changeSkill
- 056-design-avoid-breaking-changesSkill
- 057-design-feature-togglesSkill
- 058-design-bddSkill
- 059-design-atddSkill
- 110-java-maven-best-practicesSkill
- 111-java-maven-dependenciesSkill
- 112-java-maven-pluginsSkill
- 113-java-maven-documentationSkill
- 114-java-maven-searchSkill
- 121-java-object-oriented-designSkill
- 122-java-type-designSkill
- 123-java-design-patternsSkill
- 124-java-secure-codingSkill
- 125-java-concurrencySkill
- 126-java-exception-handlingSkill
- 128-java-genericsSkill
- 130-java-testing-strategiesSkill
- 131-java-testing-unit-testingSkill
- 132-java-testing-integration-testingSkill
- 133-java-testing-acceptance-testsSkill
- 141-java-refactoring-with-modern-featuresSkill
- 142-java-functional-programmingSkill
- 143-java-functional-exception-handlingSkill
- 144-java-data-oriented-programmingSkill
- 145-java-refactoring-high-performanceSkill
- 151-java-performance-jmeterSkill
- 152-java-performance-gatlingSkill
- 161-java-profiling-detectSkill
- 162-java-profiling-analyzeSkill
- 163-java-profiling-refactorSkill
- 164-java-profiling-verifySkill
- 170-java-documentationSkill
- 181-java-observability-loggingSkill
- 182-java-observability-metrics-micrometerSkill
- 183-java-observability-tracing-opentelemetrySkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

