021-problem-framing
Skill452 starsChanged 3 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Use when a problem or issue needs explicit framing before deeper analysis begins — establishing the Problem statement, Current state, Desired state, Stakeholders, and Success criteria. This should trigger when an issue's Problem Framing point of view needs evaluation, or when a maintainer directly asks to frame a problem before root-cause analysis, design, or planning begins. Part of Plinth Toolkit
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 26
MUST: read references/021-problem-framing.md before applying Problem Framing guidance
- Very specific: line 46
Read references/021-problem-framing.md, then identify what evidence is already available for the problem statement, current state, desired …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Problem Framing
Guide production of a Problem statement, Current state, Desired state, Stakeholders, and Success criteria for a problem or issue under exploration. This is an interactive SKILL.
What is covered in this Skill?
- Stating the problem independently of any specific solution
- Describing the current state using observable facts
- Describing the desired state as an outcome, not an implementation mechanism
- Identifying stakeholders affected by, accountable for, or informed about the problem
- Defining success criteria that make problem resolution verifiable
- Feeding a clarified problem frame into
022-root-cause-analysisand the remaining Functional Specification lenses
Constraints
Frame the problem before any deeper analysis. When this technique is orchestrated by another workflow, the orchestrator owns clarifying-question sequencing; when applied standalone, ask directly.
- MUST read
references/021-problem-framing.mdbefore applying Problem Framing guidance - MUST state the problem independently of any specific solution, technology, or implementation
- MUST describe the current state using observable facts, not opinions or assumed causes
- MUST describe the desired state as an outcome or capability, not a specific mechanism
- MUST identify stakeholders affected by, accountable for, or informed about the problem, not only the requester
- MUST define success criteria that are observable or measurable
- MUST NOT invent a problem statement, state, stakeholder, or success criterion when the available content is vague or ambiguous; flag the gap for a clarifying question instead
When to use this skill
- Frame this problem before deeper analysis
- Apply problem framing to this issue
- Establish the problem statement, current state, and desired state
- Identify stakeholders and success criteria for this problem
- Draft the Problem Framing section of a Functional Specification
Workflow
- Read the Reference
Read references/021-problem-framing.md, then identify what evidence is already available for the problem statement, current state, desired state, stakeholders, and success criteria.
- Separate the Problem from any Solution
Strip out wording that already assumes a fix, technology, or implementation, and restate the gap in observable terms.
- Describe Current and Desired State
Describe the current state as observable facts and the desired state as a target outcome or capability.
- Identify Stakeholders and Success Criteria
List stakeholders affected by, accountable for, or informed about the problem, then define observable or measurable success criteria.
- Report the Problem Frame
Report the Problem statement, Current state, Desired state, Stakeholders, and Success criteria, and flag any field left open pending a clarifying answer.
Reference
For detailed guidance, examples, and constraints, see references/021-problem-framing.md.
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- jabrena/plinth★ 448100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository124 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- 001-commands-inventorySkill
- 002-agents-inventorySkill
- 003-skills-inventorySkill
- 004-commands-installationSkill
- 005-agents-installationSkill
- 012-agile-epicSkill
- 013-agile-featureSkill
- 014-agile-user-storySkill
- 022-root-cause-analysisSkill
- 023-assumption-analysisSkill
- 024-context-mappingSkill
- 025-quality-attribute-discoverySkill
- 030-architecture-adr-generalSkill
- 033-architecture-diagramsSkill
- 041-planning-plan-modeSkill
- 042-planning-openspecSkill
- 043-planning-github-issuesSkill
- 044-planning-jiraSkill
- 045-planning-azure-devopsSkill
- 051-design-two-steps-methodsSkill
- 052-design-hamburger-methodSkill
- 053-design-simple-rulesSkill
- 054-design-tddSkill
- 055-design-parallel-changeSkill
- 056-design-avoid-breaking-changesSkill
- 057-design-feature-togglesSkill
- 058-design-bddSkill
- 059-design-atddSkill
- 110-java-maven-best-practicesSkill
- 111-java-maven-dependenciesSkill
- 112-java-maven-pluginsSkill
- 113-java-maven-documentationSkill
- 114-java-maven-searchSkill
- 121-java-object-oriented-designSkill
- 122-java-type-designSkill
- 123-java-design-patternsSkill
- 124-java-secure-codingSkill
- 125-java-concurrencySkill
- 126-java-exception-handlingSkill
- 128-java-genericsSkill
- 130-java-testing-strategiesSkill
- 131-java-testing-unit-testingSkill
- 132-java-testing-integration-testingSkill
- 133-java-testing-acceptance-testsSkill
- 141-java-refactoring-with-modern-featuresSkill
- 142-java-functional-programmingSkill
- 143-java-functional-exception-handlingSkill
- 144-java-data-oriented-programmingSkill
- 145-java-refactoring-high-performanceSkill
- 151-java-performance-jmeterSkill
- 152-java-performance-gatlingSkill
- 161-java-profiling-detectSkill
- 162-java-profiling-analyzeSkill
- 163-java-profiling-refactorSkill
- 164-java-profiling-verifySkill
- 170-java-documentationSkill
- 181-java-observability-loggingSkill
- 182-java-observability-metrics-micrometerSkill
- 183-java-observability-tracing-opentelemetrySkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

