agentleFS
itseffiitseffi/agentic-os/.agents/skills/systematic-debugging/SKILL.md

systematic-debugging

Skill114 starsChanged 10 months agoMITView on GitHub

Four-phase debugging process - root cause first, then fix. Use when encountering bugs or unexpected behavior.

190 other projects use a version of this, 107 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use chinese-code-review, chinese-commit-conventions and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • Leodorareluctant259Skill

    chinese-code-review

    中文代码审查规范——在保持专业严谨的同时,用符合国内团队文化的方式给出有效反馈

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • Leodorareluctant259Skill

    chinese-commit-conventions

    中文 Git 提交规范 — 适配国内团队的 commit message 规范和 changelog 自动化

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • obraSkill

    diagnosing-superpowers

    Use when a superpowers session went wrong and your human partner wants to know why — repeated work, ignored plans, stumbles, poor results, a skill that didn't fire, "it took too long", "why is it so expensive", "what is it doing" — or wants to build a bug report for the superpowers maintainers, for the current session or a past one identified by id or path, on any harness.

    Also in 20 projects that use this

  • mjunaidcaSkill

    building-chatgpt-apps

    Guides creation of ChatGPT Apps with interactive widgets using OpenAI Apps SDK and MCP servers. Use when building ChatGPT custom apps with visual UI components, embedded widgets, or rich interactive experiences. Covers widget architecture, MCP server setup with FastMCP, response metadata, and Developer Mode configuration. NOT when building standard MCP servers without widgets (use building-mcp-servers skill instead).

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • mjunaidcaSkill

    building-chat-interfaces

    Build AI chat interfaces with custom backends, authentication, and context injection. Use when integrating chat UI with AI agents, adding auth to chat, injecting user/page context, or implementing httpOnly cookie proxies. Covers ChatKitServer, useChatKit, and MCP auth patterns. NOT when building simple chatbots without persistence or custom agent integration.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • +2 more from Leodorareluctant259
  • +5 more from mjunaidca

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

14 rules. 5 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 5

    Common

    Most of the 177 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 8

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

    line 8
  2. Common:

    If you haven't completed Phase 1, you cannot propose fixes.

    line 16
  3. Common:

    Don't skip past errors or warnings

    line 25
  4. Common:

    Read stack traces completely

    line 26
  5. Common:

    If not reproducible, gather more data

    line 32
  6. Common:

    Keep tracing up until you find the source

    line 42
  7. Distinctive:

    Read reference implementation completely

    line 50
  8. Distinctive:

    Don't skim - read every line

    line 51
  9. Distinctive:

    DON'T add more fixes on top

    line 70
  10. Very specific:

    Use the tdd.md skill

    line 75
  11. Distinctive:

    No other tests broken?

    line 83
  12. Distinctive:

    Should we refactor vs continue fixing symptoms?

    line 87
  13. Distinctive:

    Use this skill when the task directly matches the workflow described above.

    line 111
  14. Distinctive:

    Do not use this skill when the request is unrelated, low-stakes, or better handled by a simpler direct response.

    line 115

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 177 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Systematic Debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

The Iron Law

NO FIXES WITHOUT ROOT CAUSE INVESTIGATION FIRST

If you haven't completed Phase 1, you cannot propose fixes.

The Four Phases

Phase 1: Root Cause Investigation

BEFORE attempting ANY fix:

  1. Read Error Messages Carefully
    • Don't skip past errors or warnings
    • Read stack traces completely
    • Note line numbers, file paths, error codes
  2. Reproduce Consistently
    • Can you trigger it reliably?
    • What are the exact steps?
    • If not reproducible, gather more data
  3. Check Recent Changes
    • Git diff, recent commits
    • New dependencies, config changes
    • Environmental differences
  4. Trace Data Flow
    • Where does bad value originate?
    • What called this with bad value?
    • Keep tracing up until you find the source

Phase 2: Pattern Analysis

  1. Find Working Examples
    • Locate similar working code in same codebase
  2. Compare Against References
    • Read reference implementation completely
    • Don't skim - read every line
  3. Identify Differences
    • What's different between working and broken?
    • List every difference, however small

Phase 3: Hypothesis and Testing

  1. Form Single Hypothesis
    • State clearly: "I think X is the root cause because Y"
    • Write it down
  2. Test Minimally
    • Make the SMALLEST possible change
    • One variable at a time
  3. Verify Before Continuing
    • Did it work? Yes -> Phase 4
    • Didn't work? Form NEW hypothesis
    • DON'T add more fixes on top

Phase 4: Implementation

  1. Create Failing Test Case
    • Use the tdd.md skill
  2. Implement Single Fix
    • ONE change at a time
    • No "while I'm here" improvements
  3. Verify Fix
    • Test passes now?
    • No other tests broken?
  4. If 3+ Fixes Failed: Question Architecture
    • Is this pattern fundamentally sound?
    • Should we refactor vs continue fixing symptoms?
    • Discuss before attempting more fixes

Red Flags - STOP and Follow Process

  • "Quick fix for now, investigate later"
  • "Just try changing X and see if it works"
  • "I don't fully understand but this might work"
  • Proposing solutions before tracing data flow
  • "One more fix attempt" (when already tried 2+)

ALL mean: STOP. Return to Phase 1.

Quick Reference

PhaseKey ActivitiesSuccess Criteria
1. Root CauseRead errors, reproduce, check changesUnderstand WHAT and WHY
2. PatternFind working examples, compareIdentify differences
3. HypothesisForm theory, test minimallyConfirmed or new hypothesis
4. ImplementationCreate test, fix, verifyBug resolved, tests pass

When to Use

Use this skill when the task directly matches the workflow described above.

When Not to Use

Do not use this skill when the request is unrelated, low-stakes, or better handled by a simpler direct response.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.