agentleFS
itseffiitseffi/agentic-os/.agents/skills/assumption-prioritization/SKILL.md

assumption-prioritization

Skill114 starsChanged 10 months agoMITView on GitHub

Prioritize assumptions by risk and importance. Use after assumption mapping to decide what to test first.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    After assumption mapping, to decide which assumptions to test first.

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Do not use this skill when the request is unrelated, low-stakes, or better handled by a simpler direct response.

    line 66

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Assumption Prioritization

Prioritize assumptions to focus validation efforts on what matters most.

When to Use

After assumption mapping, to decide which assumptions to test first.

The Framework

Score each assumption on two dimensions:

Importance (1-5): Business impact if false

  • 5 = Strategy fails, >20% revenue hit
  • 4 = Major adoption/cost driver (10-20%)
  • 3 = Moderate impact (5-10%)
  • 2 = Minor impact (<5%)
  • 1 = Negligible

Certainty (1-5): Evidence that it's true

  • 1 = No evidence, conjecture
  • 2 = Anecdotes, untested
  • 3 = Early signals, small samples
  • 4 = Strong directional data
  • 5 = Robust evidence, production proof

Risk Score = Importance x (6 - Certainty)

Higher score = riskier assumption = test first

The Process

1. Score Each Assumption

Consider:

  • Impact severity from "impact if wrong"
  • Blast radius (users/systems affected)
  • Irreversibility (cost to fix later)
  • Dependencies (does it block others?)
  • Evidence quality

2. Map to Quadrants

Low CertaintyHigh Certainty
High ImportanceTEST FIRSTMonitor
Low ImportanceDeprioritizeIgnore

3. Rank by Risk Score

Focus validation on High Importance / Low Certainty assumptions.

Output

  • 2x2 summary with counts per quadrant
  • Top risks ranked by score with rationale
  • Full ranked list of all assumptions

When Not to Use

Do not use this skill when the request is unrelated, low-stakes, or better handled by a simpler direct response.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.