agentleFS
itseffiitseffi/agentic-os/.agents/skills/llm-coding-guardrails/SKILL.md

llm-coding-guardrails

Skill114 starsChanged 10 months agoMITView on GitHub

Behavioral guardrails to reduce common LLM coding mistakes with a caution-first approach.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

20 rules. About 0 are common, 19 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈19

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Do not assume. Do not hide confusion.

    line 14
  2. Distinctive:

    If multiple interpretations exist, present them.

    line 18
  3. Distinctive:

    If a simpler approach exists, say so.

    line 19
  4. Distinctive:

    If something is unclear, stop and ask.

    line 20
  5. Distinctive:

    Write the minimum code that solves the problem.

    line 24
  6. Distinctive:

    No features beyond what was asked.

    line 26
  7. Distinctive:

    No abstractions for single-use code.

    line 27
  8. Distinctive:

    No configurability that was not requested.

    line 28
  9. Distinctive:

    No error handling for impossible scenarios.

    line 29
  10. Distinctive:

    If code is substantially longer than needed, simplify it.

    line 30
  11. Distinctive:

    When editing existing code:

    line 40
  12. Distinctive:

    Do not improve adjacent code, comments, or formatting unless required.

    line 41
  13. Distinctive:

    Do not refactor unrelated working code.

    line 42
  14. Distinctive:

    If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it.

    line 44
  15. Distinctive:

    When your changes create orphans:

    line 46
  16. Very specific:

    Remove imports/variables/functions made unused by your own change.

    line 47
  17. Distinctive:

    Do not remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.

    line 48
  18. Distinctive:

    Every changed line must map directly to the request.

    line 51
  19. Distinctive:

    Use this skill when the task directly matches the workflow described above.

    line 72
  20. Distinctive:

    Do not use this skill when the request is unrelated, low-stakes, or better handled by a simpler direct response.

    line 76

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

LLM Coding Guardrails

Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes.

Tradeoff: These guidelines bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks, use judgment.

1. Think Before Coding

Do not assume. Do not hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.

Before implementing:

  • State assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.
  • If multiple interpretations exist, present them. Do not pick silently.
  • If a simpler approach exists, say so.
  • If something is unclear, stop and ask.

2. Simplicity First

Write the minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.

  • No features beyond what was asked.
  • No abstractions for single-use code.
  • No configurability that was not requested.
  • No error handling for impossible scenarios.
  • If code is substantially longer than needed, simplify it.

Quality check:

  • Would a senior engineer call this overcomplicated?
  • If yes, simplify.

3. Surgical Changes

Touch only what is necessary. Clean up only what your change affected.

When editing existing code:

  • Do not improve adjacent code, comments, or formatting unless required.
  • Do not refactor unrelated working code.
  • Match existing style unless asked to change it.
  • If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it. Do not delete it.

When your changes create orphans:

  • Remove imports/variables/functions made unused by your own change.
  • Do not remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.

Test:

  • Every changed line must map directly to the request.

4. Goal-Driven Execution

Define success criteria and iterate until verified.

Turn requests into verifiable goals:

  • "Add validation" -> "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"
  • "Fix the bug" -> "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass"
  • "Refactor X" -> "Ensure tests pass before and after"

For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan with checks:

  1. [Step] -> verify: [check]
  2. [Step] -> verify: [check]
  3. [Step] -> verify: [check]

Strong success criteria support independent iteration. Weak criteria (for example, "make it work") require repeated clarification.

When to Use

Use this skill when the task directly matches the workflow described above.

When Not to Use

Do not use this skill when the request is unrelated, low-stakes, or better handled by a simpler direct response.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.