agentleFS
itseffiitseffi/agentic-os/.agents/skills/spec-writing/SKILL.md

spec-writing

Skill114 starsChanged 10 months agoMITView on GitHub

Convert an approved PRD or clear requirements into an implementation-ready technical spec with scope, interfaces, and acceptance criteria.

17 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 15 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill to produce an implementation-ready spec before planning or coding.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    If inputs are missing or ambiguous, list assumptions and open questions first.

    line 18
  3. Distinctive:

    No vague placeholders in final output

    line 83
  4. Distinctive:

    Use this skill when the task directly matches the workflow described above.

    line 89
  5. Distinctive:

    Do not use this skill when the request is unrelated, low-stakes, or better handled by a simpler direct response.

    line 93

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 15 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Spec Writing

Use this skill to produce an implementation-ready spec before planning or coding.

The Process

Step 1: Validate inputs

Require one of:

  • approved PRD
  • clear requirements with goals and constraints

If inputs are missing or ambiguous, list assumptions and open questions first.

Step 2: Define scope boundaries

Document:

  • in scope
  • out of scope
  • constraints (time, dependencies, compliance, platform)

Step 3: Define solution design

Specify:

  • architecture overview (high-level components)
  • interfaces/contracts
  • data model changes
  • rollout and migration approach

Step 4: Define acceptance and verification

Include:

  • acceptance criteria (testable)
  • non-functional expectations (performance, security, reliability)
  • verification commands/checks required before completion

Output Format

# [Feature Name] Technical Spec

## Goal
[What this spec delivers and why]

## Scope
- In scope:
- Out of scope:
- Constraints:

## Design
- Architecture:
- Interfaces/contracts:
- Data model changes:
- Migration/rollout:

## Risks and Dependencies
- Risks:
- Dependencies:
- Mitigations:

## Acceptance Criteria
- AC1:
- AC2:
- AC3:

## Verification Plan
- Required checks:
- Commands:
- Evidence to capture:

## Open Questions
- Q1:
- Q2:

Quality Bar

  • No vague placeholders in final output
  • Acceptance criteria must be measurable
  • Verification plan must include explicit commands

When to Use

Use this skill when the task directly matches the workflow described above.

When Not to Use

Do not use this skill when the request is unrelated, low-stakes, or better handled by a simpler direct response.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.