agentleFS
iktok90-designiktok90-design/ai-smart-contract-auditor/skills/dos-vectors/SKILL.md

dos-vectors

Skill36 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Detect denial-of-service vectors — unbounded loops, gas griefing, push-payment chokepoints, block-stuffing exposure, revert-on-receive blocking. Activate on loops over user-controlled arrays, batch withdrawals, push-style payouts, queues, auctions with "highest-bidder" refunds, large airdrops.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use pull-payments: store credits, let users withdraw.

    line 36

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

DoS vector detection

When this applies

  • Loops iterating over user-supplied or unbounded arrays
  • Push-style payment patterns (contract pushes value to N recipients)
  • Auctions that refund the previous highest bidder via direct transfer
  • Mass claim() / distribute() functions
  • Queues / stacks of withdrawals
  • Functions whose gas cost scales with n users / n tokens
  • L2 forced inclusion mechanics

Detection patterns

Unbounded loop over user-controlled array (CRITICAL-HIGH)

function distribute() external {
    for (uint i; i < holders.length; ++i) {
        payable(holders[i]).transfer(rewards[i]);   // ← gas grows; eventually un-callable
    }
}

Worse if attacker can grow holders (e.g. anyone can register).

Push-payment with revert-on-receive (HIGH)

function refundPreviousBidder() internal {
    payable(highBidder).transfer(highBid);   // ← attacker bids from contract that reverts on receive → freezes auction
}

Use pull-payments: store credits, let users withdraw.

.transfer (2300 gas) blocks smart-wallet receivers (MEDIUM-HIGH)

Smart wallets (Gnosis Safe, Argent) have fallback functions that need >2300 gas. Their users can't receive — effectively DoS for them.

Gas griefing via large calldata (HIGH on relayers)

Relayer pays gas; user provides bloated calldata to grief. Cap calldata length or charge per-byte.

external reentrant fee-loop DoS (HIGH)

Withdrawals from each strategy in a vault — if any strategy reverts, the entire withdraw fails. Use try/catch per strategy.

Block-stuffing exposure (MEDIUM)

Auction ending exactly at block.number == N lets an attacker fill the block to prevent your bid. Use deadline windows + sniping protection (extend on late bid).

Underflow-revert DoS on legacy 0.7.x code (MEDIUM)

Unchecked subtraction in Solidity ≥0.8 reverts on underflow — function permanently broken if state lands in that range.

selfdestruct to force ether on a contract that asserts address(this).balance == X (HIGH)

Anyone can selfdestruct to your contract and break a balance-equality check. Don't rely on address(this).balance equality. (Note EIP-6780 changed selfdestruct semantics — see [[selfdestruct-eip6780]].)

Forced inclusion on Arbitrum / Optimism (LOW-MEDIUM)

On rollups, anyone can force-include a tx via L1 — affects "exclusive sequencer" assumptions in auctions.

Severity rubric

PatternSeverity
Unbounded loop attacker can grow → permanent function failureCritical
Push-payment to attacker-controlled receive() blocks core flowHigh
Per-strategy revert blocks entire vault withdrawHigh
Smart-wallet receivers can't get .transfer payoutsMedium-High
Auction block-stuffingMedium
Balance-equality relianceHigh
Force-include L2 sequencer assumptionMedium
Calldata gas-grief on relayerMedium
Bounded-but-large loop costing >block gasMedium

Remediation patterns

  • Pull over push — credit balances, users withdraw.
  • Per-iteration isolation — try/catch around per-element work in batch ops.
  • Batch caps — require(arr.length <= MAX).
  • Pagination — distribute(start, end).
  • Use call not transfer — forward all gas, then check return.
  • Don't rely on address(this).balance equality — track expected balance separately.
  • Auction extensions — extend deadline on late bid to defeat block-stuffing.

False-positive notes

  • Loops over a contract-controlled small bounded array (e.g. fixed 3 strategies) are fine — note the bound.
  • Internal admin functions where DoS only hurts the admin → Info.

Related

  • [[unchecked-calls]]
  • [[selfdestruct-eip6780]]
  • [[reentrancy]]

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.