engagement-flow
Skill401 starsChanged 54 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when starting, planning, or running a multi-phase pentest or red-team engagement — to sequence the Cyber Kill Chain phases with quality gates instead of jumping straight to exploitation
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- mahumadad/quarrytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- mahumadad/quarry★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository38 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- active-directory-attackSkill
- advanced-redteamSkill
- ai-agent-redteamSkill
- ai-securitySkill
- browser-exploitationSkill
- cicd-supply-chainSkill
- cloud-securitySkill
- coding-masterySkill
- container-k8s-escapeSkill
- crypto-analysisSkill
- edr-evasionSkill
- engagement-memorySkill
- exploit-developmentSkill
- finding-disciplineSkill
- incident-responseSkill
- initial-accessSkill
- keylogger-archSkill
- malware-analysisSkill
- mobile-pentestSkill
- network-attackSkill
- opsec-disciplineSkill
- privesc-linuxSkill
- privesc-windowsSkill
- recon-osintSkill
- red-team-opsSkill
- reverse-engineeringSkill
- scope-disciplineSkill
- shellcode-devSkill
- threat-huntingSkill
- threat-model-disciplineSkill
- using-offensive-claudeSkill
- vulnerability-analysisSkill
- web-pentestSkill
- windows-boundariesSkill
- windows-mitigations-bypassSkill
- wireless-rfSkill
- writing-offensive-skillsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 15
Don't jump to exploitation.
- Distinctive: line 38
Phases 1-7: before any target interaction → scope-discipline.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Engagement Flow
Overview
A pentest/red-team engagement is a phased pipeline with gates, not a pile of techniques run ad hoc. This skill sequences the 9-phase Lockheed Martin Cyber Kill Chain and routes each phase to its commands, domain skills, and discipline checks. It is the offensive analog of brainstorming → writing-plans → executing-plans: scope the work, plan it, then execute phase by phase.
Don't jump to exploitation. Earlier phases earn the access that later phases need, and each gate keeps quality high before you advance.
The pipeline
digraph killchain {
rankdir=LR;
scope -> recon -> weaponize -> deliver -> exploit -> install -> c2 -> actions -> report;
scope [label="0 SCOPE"]; recon [label="1 RECON"]; weaponize [label="2 WEAPONIZE"];
deliver [label="3 DELIVER"]; exploit [label="4 EXPLOIT"]; install [label="5 INSTALL"];
c2 [label="6 C2"]; actions [label="7 ACTIONS"]; report [label="8 REPORT"];
}Each transition requires a gate (/engage.gate): required artifacts present, findings carry
CWE+CVSS+ATT&CK+evidence, and the automated checks pass. Gate FAIL → fix the gap before advancing.
How to run it
- Pick the workflow preset for the engagement type (web-app, network, red-team, cloud, mobile,
ad-domain, bug-bounty) and drive phases with the
/engage.*commands. - Phase 0 (scope): emit
.engage/scope/scope.json. REQUIRED: scope-discipline. - Phases 1-7: before any target interaction → scope-discipline; before any outward action → opsec-discipline; invoke the matching domain skill for the technique.
- Recall prior intel: at recon/weaponize,
/engage.memory recallto start from what worked. - Findings: REQUIRED: finding-discipline — nothing is
[CONFIRMED]without proof. - Phase 8 (report): record confirmed findings to engagement-memory; generate the report.
- Optional autopilot:
engine/engine.pyruns the phases under a budget/loop/trace with--resume(/engage.pickup); offensive actions stay operator-gated.
Red Flags — STOP, back up a phase
- "Let me just start exploiting" (no scope.json / no recon → back to phase 0/1)
- "Skip the gate, I'll document later" (gates exist so the report is complete and findings are real)
- "Recon is done, I didn't check prior intel" (run
/engage.memory recall)
Quick reference
| Phase | Command | Discipline / tooling |
| Scope | /engage.scope | scope-discipline → scope.json |
| Recon | /engage.recon | scope-discipline; /engage.memory recall |
| Exploit | /engage.exploit | opsec-discipline; finding-discipline |
| Actions | /engage.actions | action_guard gate; opsec-discipline |
| Report | /engage.report | finding-discipline; record to memory |
| Gate / resume | /engage.gate, /engage.pickup | automated checks; engine trace |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

