full-output-enforcement
Skill145 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Overrides default LLM truncation behavior. Enforces complete code generation, bans placeholder patterns, and handles token-limit splits cleanly. Apply to any task requiring exhaustive, unabridged output.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. 8 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
8
Common
Most of the 10 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 10
Treat every task as production-critical.
- Common: line 30
When a response approaches the token limit:
- Common: line 32
Do not compress remaining sections to squeeze them in.
- Common: line 33
Do not skip ahead to a conclusion.
- Common: line 34
Write at full quality up to a clean breakpoint (end of a function, end of a file, end of a section).
- Common: line 45
Before finalizing any response, verify:
- Common: line 46
No banned patterns from the list above appear anywhere in the output
- Common: line 47
Every item the user requested is present and finished
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 10 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Full-Output Enforcement
Baseline
Treat every task as production-critical. A partial output is a broken output. Do not optimize for brevity — optimize for completeness. If the user asks for a full file, deliver the full file. If the user asks for 5 components, deliver 5 components. No exceptions.
Banned Output Patterns
The following patterns are hard failures. Never produce them:
In code blocks: // ..., // rest of code, // implement here, // TODO, /* ... */, // similar to above, // continue pattern, // add more as needed, bare ... standing in for omitted code
In prose: "Let me know if you want me to continue", "I can provide more details if needed", "for brevity", "the rest follows the same pattern", "similarly for the remaining", "and so on" (when replacing actual content), "I'll leave that as an exercise"
Structural shortcuts: Outputting a skeleton when the request was for a full implementation. Showing the first and last section while skipping the middle. Replacing repeated logic with one example and a description. Describing what code should do instead of writing it.
Execution Process
- Scope — Read the full request. Count how many distinct deliverables are expected (files, functions, sections, answers). Lock that number.
- Build — Generate every deliverable completely. No partial drafts, no "you can extend this later."
- Cross-check — Before output, re-read the original request. Compare your deliverable count against the scope count. If anything is missing, add it before responding.
Handling Long Outputs
When a response approaches the token limit:
- Do not compress remaining sections to squeeze them in.
- Do not skip ahead to a conclusion.
- Write at full quality up to a clean breakpoint (end of a function, end of a file, end of a section).
- End with:
[PAUSED — X of Y complete. Send "continue" to resume from: next section name]On "continue", pick up exactly where you stopped. No recap, no repetition.
Quick Check
Before finalizing any response, verify:
- No banned patterns from the list above appear anywhere in the output
- Every item the user requested is present and finished
- Code blocks contain actual runnable code, not descriptions of what code would do
- Nothing was shortened to save space
Trending
Steady: 4 new projects took it in the last 4 weeks, 1× the 4 weeks before.thin data
Other versions85 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 72
- caorushizi/mediago★ 9.3k100% same
- ChrisChen667788/wind-comic★ 706100% same
- oasm-platform/open-asm★ 267100% same
- kresogalic8/unwatched★ 35100% same
- jmxt3/gitscape.ai★ 33100% same
- rylsherdamz-rgb/stellar-forge★ 17100% same
- imMamdouhaboammar/motion-graphics-skills★ 15100% same
- magicpro97/vibeflow★ 9100% same
- VoVuongThanhDat/agentflow★ 8100% same
- DawnMoon1542/agents-skills★ 7100% same
62 more not listed
Edited · 12
- fathomise/MailFathom★ 2096% same
- Krzysztof318/MailFathom★ 2096% same
- Hayatelin/taste-skill-zh-CN★ 815% same
- jhy0285/monofield★ 685% same
- echoleesong/claude-skills-plugin★ 496% same
- samad001z/Norn★ 3100% same
- developzone5/sanad★ 297% same
- RainMT-dv/skills-pack★ 2100% same
- wedabro/bro-skills★ 279% same
- BUGLAN/skills★ 132% same
2 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 1
- shahrukh-hack/vibe-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use find-animation-opportunities, pick-ui-library and 8 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
wxyhgkSkillfind-animation-opportunities
Search a codebase or UI for places that don't animate but should, and reject everything that shouldn't. Read-only; it proposes motion with exact values, it does not implement it. Use when the user asks "what could be animated here?" or wants to "make this feel more alive". For fixing existing animations, use improve-animations or review-animations instead.
Also in 7 projects that use this
cal1888Skillpick-ui-library
Pick the right library for a given frontend task from a curated, opinionated list — numbers, OTP inputs, charts, command menus, virtualization, drag and drop, toasts, state, styling, and more. Only runs when explicitly invoked; it does not trigger on its own.
Also in 5 projects that use this
sanmidableSkillwrite-swift
Also in 4 projects that use this
xerocSkillimprove-animations
Survey a codebase's animation and motion code as a senior motion advisor, then produce a prioritized audit and self-contained implementation plans for other agents (or cheaper models) to execute. Read-only on source code — it plans improvements, it does not apply them. Use when the user asks to "improve the animations", "audit the motion", "make this app feel better", or wants a roadmap of animation fixes rather than a review of a single diff.
Also in 7 projects that use this
VercelSkillemil-design-eng
This skill encodes Emil Kowalski's philosophy on UI polish, component design, animation decisions, and the invisible details that make software feel great.
Also in 13 projects that use this
arkanSkillreview-animations
Reviews animation and motion code against a high craft bar derived from Emil Kowalski's design engineering philosophy. Default to flagging; approval is earned.
Also in 7 projects that use this
In this repository53 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- beautiful-htmlSkill
- boris-planSkill
- brandkitSkill
- industrial-brutalist-uiSkill
- business-caseSkill
- changelog-writerSkill
- claude-code-deckSkill
- competitor-researchSkill
- content-repurposerSkill
- customer-personaSkill
- deploy-checklistSkill
- dockerfile-generatorSkill
- email-writerSkill
- exec-summarySkill
- feature-prioritizerSkill
- frontend-slidesSkill
- gpt-tasteSkill
- imagegen-frontend-mobileSkill
- imagegen-frontend-webSkill
- image-to-codeSkill
- karpathy-reviewSkill
- launch-checklistSkill
- linkedin-postSkill
- market-sizingSkill
- md-to-pdfSkill
- meeting-analyzerSkill
- minimalist-uiSkill
- newsletter-ideatorSkill
- okr-writerSkill
- prd-generatorSkill
- proposal-writerSkill
- redesign-existing-projectsSkill
- retro-facilitatorSkill
- seo-optimizerSkill
- sharpenSkill
- skill-evaluatorSkill
- skill-to-sdkSkill
- slides-builderSkill
- high-end-visual-designSkill
- sprint-plannerSkill
- stakeholder-updateSkill
- stitch-design-tasteSkill
- design-taste-frontendSkill
- design-taste-frontend-v1Skill
- test-writerSkill
- trend-spotterSkill
- ui-ux-pro-maxSkill
- user-story-writerSkill
- verify-workSkill
- voice-dnaSkill
- youtube-deepdiveSkill
- youtube-researcherSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

