google-ads-create-master-skill
Skill15 starsChanged 36 days agoMITView on GitHub
MUST load FIRST for any Google Ads create, update, or mutation task. Master workflow for create campaigns, ad groups, ads, assets, sitelinks, experiments, negative keyword lists, bid modifiers, pause/rename/update. Triggers: any Google Ads write intent.
In this repository61 other files it gives its agents.
- access-and-permissionsSkill
- accounts-and-connectionsSkill
- ad-brief-generatorSkill
- affiliate-marketingSkill
- analyse-creativeSkill
- automate-with-agentsSkill
- brief-creativeSkill
- build-reportsSkill
- clean-wasted-spendSkill
- competitor-ad-intelligenceSkill
- creative-psychology-hooksSkill
- creative-researchSkill
- diagnose-performanceSkill
- email-marketingSkill
- ga4-source-of-truthSkill
- get-startedSkill
- gomarble-skills-creative-strategistsSkill
- gomarble-skills-ecommerce-brandsSkill
- gomarble-skills-google-ads-auditSkill
- gomarble-skills-meta-ads-auditSkill
- gomarble-skills-saas-companiesSkill
- google-ads-depth-of-analysisSkill
- google-ads-guardrailsSkill
- google-ads-keywordplannerSkill
- google-ads-pmax-evaluationSkill
- google-ads-pmax-scalingSkill
- google-ads-search-analysisSkill
- google-ads-search-executionSkill
- google-ads-shoppingSkill
- google-ads-tool-fundamentalsSkill
- google-impression-shareSkill
- google-pmax-pulseSkill
- google-search-auditSkill
- google-search-term-auditSkill
- launch-campaignsSkill
- linkedin-adsSkill
- manage-campaignsSkill
- meta-ads-auditSkill
- meta-agent-operationsSkill
- meta-create-master-skillSkill
- meta-creative-analysisSkill
- meta-creative-fatigue-detectionSkill
- meta-creative-strategySkill
- meta-custom-event-interpretationSkill
- meta-daily-optimizationSkill
- meta-depth-of-analysisSkill
- meta-guardrailsSkill
- meta-performance-analysisSkill
- meta-tool-fundamentalsSkill
- microsoft-adsSkill
- organic-socialSkill
- own-creative-diagnosisSkill
- research-competitorsSkill
- search-console-master-skillSkill
- shift-budgetSkill
- shopify-order-disciplineSkill
- tiktok-adsSkill
- tiktok-create-master-skillSkill
- winning-ads-engineSkill
- winning-ads-orchestratorSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈7
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 30
Always honor google-ads-guardrails before proposing any change.
- Distinctive: line 36
Read the user's request and identify:
- Distinctive: line 42
If the entity type is ambiguous (e.g.
- Distinctive: line 48
Run targeted GAQL queries to fill in what's needed for a clean propose.
- Very specific: line 57
If the account has no conversion tracking and the user asked for smart bidding, the validator will reject — instead, propose …
- Very specific: line 63
Read the relevant sub-skill from the index above.
- Distinctive: line 85
If a step fails:
- Very specific: line 86
Read validation_errors[] and platform_errors[] carefully.
- Distinctive: line 93
After execution succeeds, post one short confirmation line per entity.
- Very specific: line 110
Empty account, no reference campaigns: Use cold-start defaults — MAXIMIZE_CLICKS bidding, single GEO from the user's market, English …
- Distinctive: line 112
Multiple items in one batch (UPDATE tools): Use a single propose call with N items in the array — never split into N calls.
- Very specific: line 115
Re-using a budget (
budget_id): Always GAQL-confirm the budget exists and is not removed before referencing. - Distinctive: line 128
Never mention "skill", "protocol", "propose tool", or internal tool names in user-facing output — describe what's happening in business …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Google Ads Mutation Workflow
Master workflow for any Google Ads create or update operation — campaigns, ad groups, ads, assets, experiments, shared negative lists, bid modifiers. Sequence is fixed: confirm intent → pull context → propose as a dry run → show the exact changes → explicit user yes → apply with mode: "live" → confirm.
Tool behavior: Every
google_ads_propose_*tool both validates and applies: call it withmode: "dryrun", show the user every proposed change (entity, current value, new value), and only after an explicit yes call it again withmode: "live"and the approvedoperation_ids. There is NO separate execute tool of any kind. Campaign + ad group + ad creation happens in ONE call togoogle_ads_propose_create_campaign_structure(the legacygoogle_ads_propose_create_campaign/_create_adgroup/_create_adtools no longer exist — never call them). Execution is a single atomic mutate: the whole structure lands or nothing does. Capture the returned IDs and resource names from the tool response.
Sub-Skill Index
Each step has a dedicated sub-skill. Read the sub-skill at its step — not all upfront.
| Step | Read before | Path |
| Campaign — create slot / update | Filling the campaign slot of google_ads_propose_create_campaign_structure, or calling google_ads_propose_update_campaigns | references/campaign.md |
| Ad group — create slot / update | Filling the adgroup slot of google_ads_propose_create_campaign_structure, or calling google_ads_propose_update_adgroups | references/ad-group.md |
| Ads (RSA) — create slot / update | Filling the ads array of google_ads_propose_create_campaign_structure, or calling google_ads_propose_update_ads | references/ad.md |
| Create / update asset, update PMax asset group | Calling google_ads_propose_create_asset, google_ads_propose_update_asset, or google_ads_propose_update_pmax_asset_group | references/asset.md |
| Create / update experiment | Calling google_ads_propose_create_experiment or google_ads_propose_update_experiment | references/experiment.md |
| Create / update shared negative keyword list | Calling google_ads_propose_create_negative_keyword_list or google_ads_propose_update_negative_keyword_list | references/negative-keyword-list.md |
| Adjust bid modifiers / ad schedule | Calling google_ads_propose_update_bid_modifiers | references/bid-modifiers.md |
Always honor google-ads-guardrails before proposing any change.
Phase 1 — Confirm the Mutation Intent
Read the user's request and identify:
- Action — create or update?
- Entity type — campaign / ad group / ad / asset / experiment / negative list / bid modifier
- Customer ID — must be 10 digits, no dashes. Confirm with the user only if multiple accounts are accessible or the request is ambiguous.
- Manager ID — required only when operating cross-account through an MCC.
If the entity type is ambiguous (e.g. user says "boost mobile by 20%" — could be DEVICE bid modifier or campaign-level mobile bid), ask exactly one clarifying question. Otherwise proceed.
Phase 2 — Pull Just-Enough Context
Run targeted GAQL queries to fill in what's needed for a clean propose. Don't dump raw rows at the user — synthesize into 1–3 lines.
Common probes (run only what's relevant):
customer.currency_code— needed for any budget input.- Existing
campaign_budget.id— when reusing a budget instead of creating one. campaign.advertising_channel_type+campaign.bidding_strategy_type— when switching strategies on update.ad_group.id/name+ parentcampaign.id— when adding ads or keywords to an existing group.customer.conversion_tracking_status— required gate for smart bidding (TARGET_CPA / MAXIMIZE_CONVERSIONS / TARGET_ROAS / MAXIMIZE_CONVERSION_VALUE).
If the account has no conversion tracking and the user asked for smart bidding, the validator will reject — instead, propose MAXIMIZE_CLICKS (TARGET_SPEND) and tell the user why.
Phase 3 — Propose
Read the relevant sub-skill from the index above. Build the propose call with all auto-detected values filled in. Each entry in a batched call returns its own operation_id, so the user can approve or decline each item.
Output a tight summary table to the user before the propose tool returns its preview — keep it short:
| Field | Proposed value | Source |
| ... | ... | ... |
After the dry-run call returns, show the user each proposed change (entity, current value, new value) and ask for an explicit yes. Then call the same tool with mode: "live" and only the approved operation_ids; that response includes the execution result and any returned IDs/resource names.
Phase 4 — Read the Result
The propose tool returns one merged response covering propose and execute. Inspect it:
success: trueandexecution_results[]populated → mutation landed. Capture each entry'sentity_id,resource_names, and surface the relevant IDs to the user.success: falseandexecution_results[i].success === false→ mutation failed at the platform. Readerror_code,error,platform_errors[]from that entry.validation_errors[]populated → propose-side validation rejected before any approval prompt. Fix the inputs and re-propose.rejected_operation_ids[]populated → user declined. Do nothing further unless they ask.timeout_operation_ids[]populated → user didn't act in the active window. They can still approve via the panel for 24 hours — let them know, then stop.
If a step fails:
- Read
validation_errors[]andplatform_errors[]carefully. If the root cause is fixable from the agent side (e.g. validation, bad ID), correct it and retry once. - If the same step fails again or the error needs a manual fix in Google Ads UI (policy violation, account suspension, missing permission), stop and surface it cleanly. Don't loop on the same broken payload — explain what failed and what the user needs to do.
Phase 5 — Confirm
After execution succeeds, post one short confirmation line per entity. Format:
Done. Created campaign
<name>(id<id>) ENABLED and ad group<name>(id<id>) ENABLED. Ads are PAUSED — enable when ready.
Default status convention (mirrors Meta):
- Campaigns — created
ENABLED(active) - Ad groups — created
ENABLED(active) - Ads — created
PAUSED. Ads are the user's final gate before spend begins.
Even when the user says "launch it" or "go live", new ads stay PAUSED until the user explicitly approves an enable step. To enable: separate explicit propose call — google_ads_propose_update_ads setting status: ENABLED. (Dry run first; apply with mode: "live" only after an explicit yes.)
We only flip between ENABLED and PAUSED. There is no removal — the API supports it, but our skill set deliberately does not. If the user asks to "delete" or "remove" an entity, propose pausing it instead and explain.
Edge Cases
- Empty account, no reference campaigns: Use cold-start defaults —
MAXIMIZE_CLICKSbidding, single GEO from the user's market, English language, ~$30–$50/day budget. Flag the cold start once: "No active campaigns to mirror — using defaults; happy to adjust before approval." - Smart bidding requested but no conversion tracking: Propose
MAXIMIZE_CLICKSinstead. Tell the user the account needs conversion tracking before TARGET_CPA / TARGET_ROAS / MAXIMIZE_CONVERSIONS / MAXIMIZE_CONVERSION_VALUE will work. - Multiple items in one batch (UPDATE tools): Use a single propose call with N items in the array — never split into N calls.
- Any create request — campaign, ad group, ads, or all three ("create a campaign with an ad group and ads"): ONE call to
google_ads_propose_create_campaign_structurewithcampaign+adgroup+adsslots. Each level is a config to create XOR an existing id (campaign/campaign_id,adgroup/adgroup_id). The server links levels via temp IDs inside one atomic mutate — you NEVER capture and thread IDs between create steps. ONE ad group per call; more ad groups → additional calls passingcampaign_id. All ads in a call land in that call's single ad group. - Rejection semantics: the execution is all-or-nothing. If the user rejects every ad of a launch that proposed ads — or rejects a parent whose children were approved — the server creates NOTHING (no orphan campaign/ad group shells).
- Re-using a budget (
budget_id): Always GAQL-confirm the budget exists and is not removed before referencing. - Cross-account (MCC):
manager_idmust be set on the propose call. Verify the manager has linkage to the customer before proposing.
Output Rules
- Phase 1 / Phase 2 synthesis: 1–3 lines. Account, currency, reference campaign or "cold start". Done.
- Phase 3 summary table: Compact. Only fields the user could reasonably want to override.
- Approval: Show the dry-run changes once, clearly, and ask for an explicit yes before calling with
mode: "live". - Phase 4 errors: Short error line + suggested fix. No raw API dumps.
- Phase 5 confirmation: One line per executed entity. Then stop.
Never mention "skill", "protocol", "propose tool", or internal tool names in user-facing output — describe what's happening in business terms.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

