tfx-review
Skill1 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
코드 리뷰가 필요할 때 사용한다. 'review', '리뷰해줘', '코드 봐줘', '이거 괜찮아?', 'PR 리뷰', '변경사항 확인' 같은 요청에 반드시 사용. git diff, 특정 파일, 또는 최근 변경에 대한 빠른 피드백이 필요할 때 적극 활용. 코드 변경사항 확인, '이거 문제 없어?', 'looks good?', 'LGTM?', '머지해도 될까' 같은 요청에도 적극 활용. 꼼꼼한 심층 리뷰는 tfx-deep-review를 사용.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- tellang/trifluxtheir own version, first seen Nov 11, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- tellang/triflux★ 7same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository41 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- merge-worktreeSkill
- star-promptSkill
- tfx-analysisSkill
- tfx-auto-codexSkill
- tfx-autopilotSkill
- tfx-autoresearchSkill
- tfx-autorouteSkill
- tfx-autoSkill
- tfx-codexSkill
- tfx-codex-swarmSkill
- tfx-consensusSkill
- tfx-debateSkill
- tfx-deep-analysisSkill
- tfx-deep-interviewSkill
- tfx-deep-planSkill
- tfx-deep-qaSkill
- tfx-deep-researchSkill
- tfx-deep-reviewSkill
- tfx-doctorSkill
- tfx-findSkill
- tfx-forgeSkill
- tfx-fullcycleSkill
- tfx-geminiSkill
- tfx-hooksSkill
- tfx-hubSkill
- tfx-indexSkill
- tfx-interviewSkill
- tfx-multiSkill
- tfx-panelSkill
- tfx-persistSkill
- tfx-planSkill
- tfx-profileSkill
- tfx-pruneSkill
- tfx-psmux-rulesSkill
- tfx-qaSkill
- tfx-ralphSkill
- tfx-remote-setupSkill
- tfx-remote-spawnSkill
- tfx-researchSkill
- tfx-setupSkill
The file
Files
tfx-review — Light Code Review
ARGUMENTS 처리: 이 스킬이
ARGUMENTS: <값>과 함께 호출되면, 해당 값을 사용자 입력으로 취급하여 워크플로우의 첫 단계 입력으로 사용한다. ARGUMENTS가 비어있거나 없으면 기존 절차대로 사용자에게 입력을 요청한다.
Deep 버전: tfx-deep-review. "제대로/꼼꼼히" 수정자로 자동 에스컬레이션. HARD RULE: 리뷰 결과를 생성할 때 Claude가 직접 git log/diff를 실행하지 마라. Codex code-reviewer에게 위임하라. Codex 단일 리뷰로 빠른 피드백. 토큰 최소화.
워크플로우
Step 1: 리뷰 대상 식별
우선순위:
1. 사용자가 파일 경로 지정 → 해당 파일
2. git diff (staged + unstaged) → 변경된 파일
3. 최근 커밋 → git diff HEAD~1Step 2: Codex 리뷰 실행
bash ~/.claude/scripts/tfx-route.sh codex \
"다음 코드 변경을 리뷰하라. 심각도별 분류(critical/high/medium/low).
체크: 로직 결함, 보안 취약점, 성능 문제, SOLID 위반, 에러 핸들링.
변경사항: {diff_or_file_content}" reviewStep 3: 결과 포맷
## Code Review: {target}
### Critical (즉시 수정)
- [C1] {파일:라인} — {설명}
### High (수정 권장)
- [H1] {파일:라인} — {설명}
### Medium (개선 제안)
- [M1] {파일:라인} — {설명}
### Summary
{전체 코드 품질 평가 1-2줄}토큰: ~8K
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

